Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+BNC\s+vs\s+UHF\s+connectors\s+for\s+HF\s+100w\s+use\s*$/: 14 ]

Total 14 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] BNC vs UHF connectors for HF 100w use (score: 1)
Author: ny9h@arrl.net (Bill Steffey NY9H)
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 16:43:28 -0500
While I started using BNCs on my receive only connections, like a second receiver output for the Omni 6+ , I also have been using them for Xmit as well. Their convenience of quick disconnect beat the
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00352.html (8,976 bytes)

2. [TenTec] BNC vs UHF connectors for HF 100w use (score: 1)
Author: rohre@arlut.utexas.edu (Stuart Rohre)
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 17:52:35 -0500
OK, the standard BNC is rated at 500 volts. At 50 ohms, that looks like 5 kW. (P = V squared over Z) But, if you feel concerned, you can get BNC high voltage version with about a one inch ribbed back
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00353.html (9,018 bytes)

3. [TenTec] BNC vs UHF connectors for HF 100w use (score: 1)
Author: geraldj@isunet.net (Dr. Gerald N. Johnson, electrical engineer)
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 17:00:12 -0500
Neither center pin will carry the 10 amps current required to feed a 50 ohm load 500 volts. Considering the center conductor of RG58 is only 18 or 20 gauge, the WIRE won't carry more than a couple am
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00354.html (9,297 bytes)

4. [TenTec] BNC vs UHF connectors for HF 100w use (score: 1)
Author: w5yr@att.net (George, W5YR)
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 18:06:05 -0500
Stuart, how much current will that little pin and socket carry? 73/72/oo, George W5YR - the Yellow Rose of Texas Fairview, TX 30 mi NE of Dallas in Collin county EM13qe Amateur Radio W5YR, in the 56t
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00355.html (9,570 bytes)

5. [TenTec] BNC vs UHF connectors for HF 100w use (score: 1)
Author: rohre@arlut.utexas.edu (Stuart Rohre)
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 18:20:54 -0500
Good point Jerry!!! I just looked at the voltage rating which is the dielectric flash over obviously in this case. I have seen them used to 500 watts, but of course the duty cycle is a factor in a la
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00357.html (9,752 bytes)

6. [TenTec] BNC vs UHF connectors for HF 100w use (score: 1)
Author: jimr.reid@verizon.net (Jim Reid)
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 13:41:35 -1000
I think I understand that the "internals" of both the BNC and the Type N connectors are the same! That is same pin and conductor size. Is this true? 73, Jim KH7M
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00359.html (9,529 bytes)

7. [TenTec] BNC vs UHF connectors for HF 100w use (score: 1)
Author: rohre@arlut.utexas.edu (Stuart Rohre)
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 18:48:00 -0500
Not true, the N connector pin is larger, maybe by a factor of 3 plus? Of course this is tricky, because of skin effect it is the area of the outside of the pin that is carrying the most current. Stua
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00360.html (9,663 bytes)

8. [TenTec] BNC vs UHF connectors for HF 100w use (score: 1)
Author: geraldj@isunet.net (Dr. Gerald N. Johnson, electrical engineer)
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 17:55:57 -0500
N males mate to BNC females without stretching the BNC female center pin excessively. Most of the pin pieces are larger in the N connector. The threaded ring of the N connector holds the connector pi
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00362.html (10,545 bytes)

9. [TenTec] BNC vs UHF connectors for HF 100w use (score: 1)
Author: cherry@getnet.net (cherry@getnet.net)
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 17:17:22 -0700
I have heated up both N and BNC connectors running high VSWR at powers as low as 200 Watts. The UHF connector does have a larger center pin. I melted a RG-8 cable with 200 Watts at 10:1 VSWR. I do no
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00365.html (10,704 bytes)

10. [TenTec] BNC vs UHF connectors for HF 100w use (score: 1)
Author: ve1adh@accesswave.ca (Dave McClafferty)
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 21:36:42 -0300
I have been using BNC connectors here for about 15 years. I usually run 100 watts but have run as high as 600 (Tentec Hercules 444) and often run 300 (homebrew amp). I use a 4x1 coax relay that was d
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00367.html (10,137 bytes)

11. [TenTec] BNC vs UHF connectors for HF 100w use (score: 1)
Author: geraldj@isunet.net (Dr. Gerald N. Johnson, electrical engineer)
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 20:48:19 -0500
Yes the UHF has a fat center pin, but it has a rotten ground connection. I burned one black in a 2m mobile with only 18 watts many years ago. The ground connection is only as good as the ring is tigh
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00373.html (9,860 bytes)

12. [TenTec] BNC vs UHF connectors for HF 100w use (score: 1)
Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch)
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2002 10:10:55 -0400
A BNC male will plug into a 50 ohm N female with a good fit, if you remove the bayonet from the BNC. The 50 ohm N will plug into a BNC female with no changes. All of the internal dimensions are very
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00381.html (10,176 bytes)

13. [TenTec] BNC vs UHF connectors for HF 100w use (score: 1)
Author: geraldj@isunet.net (Dr. Gerald N. Johnson, electrical engineer)
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2002 10:04:34 -0500
The mating parts of the pins of N and BNC are similar sizes. The rest of the pins are not. N is mostly air insulated so the outsides of the pin and socket beyond the mating portion is a different siz
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00385.html (10,267 bytes)

14. [TenTec] BNC vs UHF connectors for HF 100w use (score: 1)
Author: n4xy@arrl.net (Ed Tanton)
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 18:00:56 -0400
There's absolutely no problem at HF for BNCs at 100W. I have a Waters MIL wattmeter that reads to 2000W that uses BNCs... not that I'd remotely consider putting that much power on it. BNCs have their
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00394.html (9,672 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu