Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+CQ\s+TT\s+CW\s+CALLING\s+FREQ\s+\-\s+GREAT\s+IDEA\!\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+CQ\s+TT\s+CW\s+CALLING\s+FREQ\s+\-\s+GREAT\s+IDEA\!\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] CQ TT CW CALLING FREQ - GREAT IDEA! (score: 1): Author: mauro@idt.net (Bob Mauro - PeopleNet); Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2001 07:26:31 -0500 (EST); I think this is an excellent idea. can we pick a freq on 30 meters as the CQ TT freq? Or would a better one be on 20? not everyone can work 30 or 40 or 80 meters. but i think we all have 20 ants. Wha; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-01/msg00282.html (13,918 bytes)
2. [TenTec] CQ TT CW CALLING FREQ - GREAT IDEA! (score: 1): Author: n0hs@swbell.net (David Stanfield); Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2001 07:28:35 -0600; 30 Meters may be the best all around (sort of range limited in the day) with plenty of open spaces, but do we want to stay off of WARC? If we do then maybe 40 at night and 20 day. Lets pick freqs wer; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-01/msg00286.html (14,555 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]