Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Century\s+22\s+Internal\s+Keyer\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Century\s+22\s+Internal\s+Keyer\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Century 22 Internal Keyer (score: 1): Author: KA3IHE@comcast.net (KA3IHE); Date: Sat May 24 15:41:31 2003; Greetings everyone. Could someone answer a question, please? Is the internal keyer that was available for the Century 22 (Model 679 keyer, I think) iambic, or would I need an external iambic keyer? T; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-05/msg00966.html (6,760 bytes)
2. [TenTec] Century 22 Internal Keyer (score: 1): Author: andrew.m.moore@verizon.net (Andrew Moore); Date: Sat May 24 16:44:21 2003; It seemed to be "semi automatic" -- kind of like a bug. It had auto-repeating dits, but the dah side was not repeating. --Andrew, NV1B CFO 963; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-05/msg00967.html (7,039 bytes)
3. [TenTec] Century 22 Internal Keyer (score: 1): Author: dub@oklahoma.net (J. W. (Dub) Thornton); Date: Sun May 25 11:44:01 2003; This has my mind going WAY back, but I ordered the Century 22 keyer from Ten Tec, and installed it, perhaps in the 1990 era. The one I received did not have any "semi-automatic" action, but both dits; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-05/msg00981.html (8,271 bytes)
4. [TenTec] Century 22 Internal Keyer (score: 1): Author: winjones@ix.netcom.com (Winston F. Jones); Date: Sun May 25 18:13:56 2003; I bought a Century 22 about three years ago and it didn't have an internal keyer in it. I discovered that the circuit board used in the Model 670 external keyer for the Century 21 is the same as the; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-05/msg00992.html (9,683 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]