Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Choice\s+of\s+rigs\s+for\s+contests\s*$/: 14 ]

Total 14 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Choice of Rigs for Contests (score: 1)
Author: John Rippey <w3uls@3n.net>
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 14:44:38 -0500
I can imagine a bunch of reasons why most "big guns" use FT-1000MPs, which admittedly will be eligible for display at the Smithsonian as museum artifacts before long. And the main reason has nothing
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00442.html (7,678 bytes)

2. Re: [TenTec] Choice of Rigs for Contests (score: 1)
Author: "rr1632" <rr1632@dragonbbs.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 14:58:09 -0500
If you are talking about W1ZR, that is a Paragon in the background,I beleive, and 2 TT amps....way to go OM.....Mark...K8ML-- Original Message -- From: John Rippey <w3uls@3n.net> Reply-To: tentec@con
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00443.html (9,081 bytes)

3. Re: [TenTec] Choice of Rigs for Contests (score: 1)
Author: jsb@digistar.com
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 16:21:54 -0500 (EST)
Yep - it defies logic why anyone would buy a new FT-1000 or Field. That technology is so out-dated. Sure it works but you can get better gear for the same money (i.e., Jupiter / Orion). _____________
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00447.html (7,352 bytes)

4. [TenTec] Choice of rigs for contests (score: 1)
Author: "Rob Atkinson, K5UJ" <k5uj@hotmail.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 23:35:22 +0000
<<<...And the main reason has nothing to do with performance. It's familiarity. These folks depend on a bunch of volunteer ops descending on their QTH for a weekend of work/play. The only rigs the va
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00451.html (8,443 bytes)

5. Re: [TenTec] Choice of rigs for contests (score: 1)
Author: Duane A Calvin <ac5aa@juno.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 18:52:50 -0600
I wonder how many will want to cough up the $7,000 - 8.000 it is presumed to cost. Especially when we hear all the comments about the price of the Orion at less than half of that! 73, Duane -- Duane
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00456.html (9,006 bytes)

6. Re: [TenTec] Choice of rigs for contests (score: 1)
Author: ac5e@comcast.net
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 01:18:07 +0000
Pricing of any imported product depends on the demand and the exchange rate. Last spring the exchange rate between the dollar and the yen was 138:1. The last time I looked the rate was 108:1. And it
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00460.html (10,756 bytes)

7. RE: [TenTec] Choice of rigs for contests (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Martin" <royalct@inr.net>
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 20:21:03 -0500
How about in the neighborhood of 10 big ones (according to an Icom rep at a local dealer. Ron ....... NU1U I wonder how many will want to cough up the $7,000 - 8.000 it is presumed to cost. Especiall
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00461.html (9,726 bytes)

8. Re: [TenTec] Choice of rigs for contests (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Notarius WN3VAW" <wn3vaw@fyi.net>
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 20:50:00 -0500
Ummm, Rob, I would honestly wonder about that. I suspect that within a few minutes, the operators would become accustomed enough to the Orion that it wouldn't be a problem, especially if they are sem
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00466.html (10,495 bytes)

9. Re: [TenTec] Choice of rigs for contests (score: 1)
Author: Kc9cdt@aol.com
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 21:23:22 EST
I was at the Fort Wayne, IN Hamfest last wk end. Talked to Icom, the 7800 will be more like $10,000? AND the first run is spoken for. Go Figure... Lee _______________________________________________
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00467.html (8,095 bytes)

10. Re: [TenTec] Choice of rigs for contests (score: 1)
Author: "Edward Crawford" <w4wvw@msn.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 21:47:05 -0500
I have always stayed clear of making any comments concerning the Orion discussions on the reflector, since I don't have any vested interest in the radio, other than the fact it makes stimulating read
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00472.html (13,162 bytes)

11. RE: [TenTec] Choice of rigs for contests (score: 1)
Author: "John T. Fleming" <W3GQJ@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 21:55:00 -0500
Rob, I went from an Omni D to a Jupiter and now the Orion. If you have operated other Ten-Tec rigs, they are very similar since the same engineering concepts carry forward. I just bought a 706MKIIG,
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00474.html (9,176 bytes)

12. Re: [TenTec] Choice of rigs for contests (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Whiteside" <tomw@ecpi.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 22:11:39 -0600
I got a chance to play with an Orion very briefly at the W5KFT DX Bash a while back and came away with the feeling that the Orion seemed to have some powerful features but had the concern that the le
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00476.html (10,444 bytes)

13. Re: [TenTec] Choice of rigs for contests (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 23:16:18 -0600
My impression is that you have pretty much hit the nail on the head. There really are just a few new control concepts in the Orion, and those seem to be the most difficult to figure out. But they ge
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00477.html (10,481 bytes)

14. RE: [TenTec] Choice of rigs for contests (score: 1)
Author: Eric Scace K3NA <eric@k3na.org>
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 17:35:37 -0500
People have forgotten that the FT-1000 had a steep learning curve when it first came out. The necessity to dig through some of the menus to set up the rig for tuning rates and such meant a lot of con
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00536.html (8,746 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu