Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Classic\s+Orion\s+optional\s+filters\,\s+need\s+suggestion\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Classic\s+Orion\s+optional\s+filters\,\s+need\s+suggestion\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Classic Orion optional filters, need suggestion (score: 1): Author: Arthur <isartw@gmail.com>; Date: Sun, 24 Dec 2006 18:11:03 +0200; Are the optional filters worth to install in Orion I, the classic one ? Accordingly ARRL performance review, the additional IF apmlifier is engaged for those filters and this is the cause of dynamic; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-12/msg00662.html (7,283 bytes)
2. [TenTec] Classic Orion optional filters, need suggestion (score: 1): Author: <k8vf_mark@centurytel.net>; Date: Sun, 24 Dec 2006 12:42:21 -0500; One work around is to purchase the INRAD #762 filter and place it in the 1000Hz slot(removing the 1000Hz filter, of course). On mine with V2 firmware, the 600 Hz filter will then come on at 1000Hz...; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-12/msg00664.html (7,269 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] Classic Orion optional filters, need suggestion (score: 1): Author: Neal Campbell K3NC <nealk3nc@gmail.com>; Date: Sun, 24 Dec 2006 13:02:32 -0500; I have 2 of the 762s for sale at $50 each if anyone is interested! _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listin; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-12/msg00666.html (8,788 bytes)
4. Re: [TenTec] Classic Orion optional filters, need suggestion (score: 1): Author: "Barry Gross" <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>; Date: Sun, 24 Dec 2006 18:13:58 +0000; I agree with the recommendation of the Inrad 762 filter, but not with the alternative suggestion of placing it in the 500hz slot - there would be an enormous gain mismatch, especially at the point wh; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-12/msg00667.html (8,339 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]