Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Copying\s+CW\s+in\s+your\s+head\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Copying\s+CW\s+in\s+your\s+head\s*$/: 23 ]

Total 23 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Copying CW in your head (score: 1): Author: pklein@2alpha.net (Peter A. Klein); Date: Thu, 23 Sep 1999 00:41:08 -0700; This is more of a CW question than a Ten Tec question, but since the two are so closely related, why not? I've been operating a lot of PSK31 in the last few months, to the detriment of my CW. I must; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-09/msg00417.html (10,285 bytes)
2. [TenTec] Copying CW in your head (score: 1): Author: aa4nn@juno.com (Joe L Blackwell); Date: Thu, 23 Sep 1999 05:09:26 -0400; On Thu, 23 Sep 1999 00:41:08 -0700 "Peter A. Klein" <pklein@2alpha.net> writes: Just saying it takes practice and patience is not very enlightening. I used to have this little window in my mind where; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-09/msg00418.html (11,015 bytes)
3. [TenTec] Copying CW in your head (score: 1): Author: vbbond@ix.netcom.com (vbbond@ix.netcom.com); Date: Thu, 23 Sep 1999 06:41:10 -0700; Peter: In my experience, getting on the air and building over time your "stamina" to sit, listen and concentrate on conversational CW has no substitute. Just do it as time permits. GL 73, Vince,K7NA; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-09/msg00421.html (8,533 bytes)
4. [TenTec] Copying CW in your head (score: 1): Author: N4NT@wireco.net (Michael O. Hyder); Date: Thu, 23 Sep 1999 09:48:48 -0400; You might try some sort of meditation. Thinking of several things at once wastes the life as the mind is not with the body, but racing out ahead. Somebody told me once that if I have one foot in tomo; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-09/msg00422.html (12,063 bytes)
5. [TenTec] Copying CW in your head (score: 1): Author: JimN0OCT@aol.com (JimN0OCT@aol.com); Date: Thu, 23 Sep 1999 11:22:44 EDT; Sure! The first thing to remember is that not every word is important. It took me a long time to figure this out, but it really helps. If you don't get a word, forget it--it'll come to you [really].; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-09/msg00427.html (9,534 bytes)
6. [TenTec] Copying CW in your head (score: 1): Author: n0sbm@moonworks.com (Alan Bryant); Date: Thu, 23 Sep 1999 09:11:39 -0600; I'm not sure age has as much to do with some of the things you mentioned as just being a bit rusty. One of the other suggestions in response was just to get in there and do it, and I couldn't agree m; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-09/msg00428.html (9,542 bytes)
7. [TenTec] Copying CW in your head (score: 1): Author: Bill_Ames@hyperion.com (Bill_Ames@hyperion.com); Date: Thu, 23 Sep 1999 12:36:52 -0400; There is one fool proof way to learn to copy CW in your head. It is: To really want to understand what the person is saying. The topic of the exchange must be something that is important to you, some; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-09/msg00430.html (9,148 bytes)
8. [TenTec] Copying CW in your head (score: 1): Author: jyoung@tir.com (Jess Young); Date: Thu, 23 Sep 1999 14:37:38 -0400; I suffer from the same problem myself, Peter. I was an Army CW op back in the early 60's...used to do CW nets at 35 wpm......problem is, they were all 5 letter code groups, and I copied on a Mill typ; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-09/msg00449.html (12,941 bytes)
9. [TenTec] Copying CW in your head (score: 1): Author: geraldj@ames.net (Dr. Gerald N. Johnson, P.E.); Date: Thu, 23 Sep 1999 13:20:23 -0500; Copying code groups can be easier than plain language because you absolutely can't anticipate the next character or the ending of the group. Anticipating and finishing a word before its all sent is a; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-09/msg00451.html (8,919 bytes)
10. [TenTec] Copying CW in your head (score: 1): Author: jreid@aloha.net (Jim Reid); Date: Thu, 23 Sep 1999 09:27:18 -1000; Hi Peter, You wrote, in part: I had this same problem. Went to work, poled a bunch of the great CW folks, then put it altogether in a summary. You might find some help somewhere in the following piec; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-09/msg00453.html (9,321 bytes)
11. [TenTec] Copying CW in your head (score: 1): Author: ai2q@ispchannel.com (ai2q); Date: Thu, 23 Sep 1999 17:39:25 -0400; Something nobody has mentioned is that to be a really good CW conversationalist, you have to be able to spell! Judging by some of the email postings, that may not apply to every would-be CW hotshot.; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-09/msg00457.html (8,912 bytes)
12. [TenTec] Copying CW in your head (score: 1): Author: jdvoracek@vvm.com (John Dvoracek); Date: Thu, 23 Sep 1999 17:31:09 -0500; Do high speed ops prefer abbreviations and "cw words" or complete spelling? E.g., would high speed ops prefer to hear "rcvr hr is old kwd930 es shud gg soon es buy nw omni" or "receiver here is old k; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-09/msg00458.html (9,259 bytes)
13. [TenTec] Copying CW in your head (score: 1): Author: k8vt@ameritech.net (Carter Grabarczyk); Date: Thu, 23 Sep 1999 18:34:17 -0400; ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ I dunno, Joe, sounds a little dangerous to me =:-o (However, the rest of your advice was very good) 73/Carter/K8VT (with tongue planted firmly in cheek) -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.con; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-09/msg00459.html (9,117 bytes)
14. [TenTec] Copying CW in your head (score: 1): Author: jreid@aloha.net (Jim Reid); Date: Thu, 23 Sep 1999 13:16:54 -1000; Guess we concentrate on ideas, Alex. Have tried to be careful with email spelling, use the spell checker, but at times the homonym feature of the language trips-up both my spelling and the checkers; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-09/msg00461.html (9,874 bytes)
15. [TenTec] Copying CW in your head (score: 1): Author: N4NT@wireco.net (Michael O. Hyder); Date: Thu, 23 Sep 99 19:27:13 EDT; I think it doesn't matter whether you spell it out or abbreviate it. A good CW op reads your meaning. Misspelled words are another matter as they 'don't compute.' So with misused abbreviations (like; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-09/msg00462.html (10,085 bytes)
16. [TenTec] Copying CW in your head (score: 1): Author: aa4nn@juno.com (Joe L Blackwell); Date: Thu, 23 Sep 1999 19:39:14 -0400; On Thu, 23 Sep 1999 17:31:09 -0500 "John Dvoracek" <jdvoracek@vvm.com> writes: snip By far the best at high speeds, 40+, is to use the full words. The reason these funny abbreviations came about in t; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-09/msg00463.html (8,853 bytes)
17. [TenTec] Copying CW in your head (score: 1): Author: w8au@sssnet.com (w8au@sssnet.com); Date: Thu, 23 Sep 1999 19:43:04 -0400; It's not so much the speed as the mechanism used for sending. Folks using hand keying (straight key, bug and keyer) use abbreviations...as many as they can, to allow "more words per minute with minim; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-09/msg00464.html (10,760 bytes)
18. [TenTec] Copying CW in your head (score: 1): Author: aa4nn@juno.com (Joe L Blackwell); Date: Thu, 23 Sep 1999 19:54:32 -0400; So well said! Another thing, is good sentence structure which will allow the listener to logically follow whatever is being said (sent). That in itself will make copying in the head much easier. Spel; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-09/msg00465.html (8,692 bytes)
19. [TenTec] Copying CW in your head (score: 1): Author: ac5aa@juno.com (ac5aa@juno.com); Date: Thu, 23 Sep 1999 18:13:38 -0500; I prefer the std CW abbreviations. I have copied in my head for years because I can't write at 20 wpm. Oddball abbreviations cause problems, but I don't hear them much on the air. Spelling out words; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-09/msg00466.html (10,026 bytes)
20. [TenTec] Copying CW in your head (score: 1): Author: aa4nn@juno.com (Joe L Blackwell); Date: Fri, 24 Sep 1999 08:31:38 -0400; after Same concern here, every keyboard should have the BT key, (-...-) to indicate start of a new subject or sentence. I use commas a lot ( --..-- ) just as if typing a letter, to isolate those prep; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-09/msg00472.html (9,111 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]