Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Info\s+on\s+the\s+Argonaut\s+515\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Info\s+on\s+the\s+Argonaut\s+515\?\s*$/: 26 ]

Total 26 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Info on the Argonaut 515? (score: 1): Author: <nz7c@cox.net>; Date: Sat, 22 May 2004 10:52:01 -0400; I would very much like to hear anyone's experience with the Argonaut 515 and any produced for it. I understand that only about 800 were made. Does anyone know why the run was only 800 and how the rig; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-05/msg00681.html (6,588 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] Info on the Argonaut 515? (score: 1): Author: Clark Savage Turner <csturner@kcbx.net>; Date: Sat, 22 May 2004 10:55:15 -0700; As I recall, Tim, the 515 was not cheap (compared to other rigs people wanted at that time). The 515 has a solid receiver, same basic design as the Triton IV, probably some improvement over the 509 (; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-05/msg00686.html (8,602 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] Info on the Argonaut 515? (score: 1): Author: Cellobrown@aol.com; Date: Sat, 22 May 2004 14:05:07 EDT; Dear Clark: It is good to see your name on the list. I hope all is just great with you. Your address is different so I suspect a change has occurred. I hope it is for the better. Best to Belinda and; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-05/msg00687.html (7,005 bytes)
4. Re: [TenTec] Info on the Argonaut 515? (score: 1): Author: "Al Gulseth" <wb5jnc@qsl.net>; Date: Sat, 22 May 2004 18:01:56 -0500 (CDT); As I recall I had a conversation with a representative of Ten-Tec (Scott?) just after theannouncement that the Argonaut was being discontinued. I asked why, and if I rememberthe conversation correctl; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-05/msg00693.html (7,639 bytes)
5. Re: [TenTec] Info on the Argonaut 515? (score: 1): Author: "dr7zyq" <dr7zyq@usamedia.tv>; Date: Sat, 22 May 2004 16:24:25 -0700; In addition, the Argosy had a built-in 50 watt amp (switchable to 5 to 10 watts), and none was available for the 515 because of the FCC 10 meter ban (the 405 was no longer being made). * * * * * * *; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-05/msg00697.html (8,674 bytes)
6. Re: [TenTec] Info on the Argonaut 515? (score: 1): Author: "dr7zyq" <dr7zyq@usamedia.tv>; Date: Sun, 23 May 2004 00:49:31 -0700; Also, the 405 linear that had been available for the 505 and 509 was lost to the FCC 10/11 meter amp ban -- whereas the Argosy had the amp built in and could be switched between 5-10 and 50 watts. Th; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-05/msg00702.html (9,275 bytes)
7. Re: [TenTec] Info on the Argonaut 515? (score: 1): Author: "Stuart Rohre" <rohre@arlut.utexas.edu>; Date: Mon, 24 May 2004 13:58:50 -0500; I think at the time of the 515 introduction; there was not as much interest in QRP. The price might have impeded some wider acceptance of the radio. Most of the QRP rigs of that time were low power,; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-05/msg00775.html (8,068 bytes)
8. Re: [TenTec] Info on the Argonaut 515? (score: 1): Author: James E McClellan <n8luv_jm@juno.com>; Date: Tue, 25 May 2004 06:41:50 -0400; Hi 515 fellas, Hey, what happened to the story that there was a lawsuit over the name "Argonaut"? As I recall, someone (GE, RCA, etc.) sued TenTec over the rights of the name of Argonaut and won the; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-05/msg00826.html (9,260 bytes)
9. Re: [TenTec] Info on the Argonaut 515? (score: 1): Author: w4foa@comcast.net; Date: Tue, 25 May 2004 10:50:05 +0000; Jim, I'm probably wrong but I believe it was the Triton series, wasn't it? 73 Tony, W4FOA _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contes; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-05/msg00827.html (9,833 bytes)
10. Re: [TenTec] Info on the Argonaut 515? (score: 1): Author: James E McClellan <n8luv_jm@juno.com>; Date: Tue, 25 May 2004 07:00:29 -0400; Hi Tony and 515 gang, I'm not sure Tony. You may be right. I'll have to do some checking on it. -- I was confident that it was the Argonaut, but now -- I'll check around. Maybe someone else can remem; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-05/msg00828.html (11,511 bytes)
11. Re: [TenTec] Info on the Argonaut 515? (score: 1): Author: "Paul Valko - W8KC" <w8kc@comcast.net>; Date: Tue, 25 May 2004 07:04:48 -0400; No ... you are quite right. It was the Triton series that ran into trouble with Motorola. _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contes; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-05/msg00829.html (11,270 bytes)
12. Re: [TenTec] Info on the Argonaut 515? (score: 1): Author: w4foa@comcast.net; Date: Tue, 25 May 2004 11:39:53 +0000; OK Jim, let us know what you find out. I was thinking Ten Tec even made another Argonaut (Model escapes me) some years after they made the 515. FYI, I no longer have my 515 but it certainly was a del; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-05/msg00830.html (12,544 bytes)
13. Re: [TenTec] Info on the Argonaut 515? (score: 1): Author: Dave Moorman <dmoorman4@comcast.net>; Date: Tue, 25 May 2004 10:30:12 -0500; I believe it was the Triton series and that the offended party was Motorola. Dave On May 25, 2004, at 6:00 AM, James E McClellan wrote: Hi Tony and 515 gang, I'm not sure Tony. You may be right. I'll; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-05/msg00837.html (8,894 bytes)
14. Re: [TenTec] Info on the Argonaut 515? (score: 1): Author: "Stuart Rohre" <rohre@arlut.utexas.edu>; Date: Tue, 25 May 2004 14:22:07 -0500; Yes, Ten Tec made the Argonaut II and now are making the Argo V. -Stuart K5KVH _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/ma; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-05/msg00847.html (8,329 bytes)
15. Re: [TenTec] Info on the Argonaut 515? (score: 1): Author: "Bill Rowlett" <kc4atu@hotmail.com>; Date: Tue, 25 May 2004 23:50:04 +0000; It is the Argonaut V, the Argo is the low power version of the Scout. Lets call them as they are. 73, Bill kc4atu Owner of both the Argo 556 and the Argonaut V From: "Stuart Rohre" <rohre@arlut.utexa; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-05/msg00853.html (9,349 bytes)
16. Re: [TenTec] Info on the Argonaut 515? (score: 1): Author: Dave Moorman <davemoorman@comcast.net>; Date: Tue, 25 May 2004 10:29:48 -0500; I believe it was the Triton series and that the offended party was Motorola. Dave On May 25, 2004, at 6:00 AM, James E McClellan wrote: Hi Tony and 515 gang, I'm not sure Tony. You may be right. I'll; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-05/msg00857.html (8,920 bytes)
17. Re: [TenTec] Info on the Argonaut 515? (score: 1): Author: "Stuart Rohre" <rohre@arlut.utexas.edu>; Date: Tue, 25 May 2004 22:48:06 -0500; I verified via web that Motorola indeed used Triton as a model name apparently for cell phone. Stuart K5KVH _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com h; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-05/msg00862.html (8,535 bytes)
18. Re: [TenTec] Info on the Argonaut 515? (score: 1): Author: "Stuart Rohre" <rohre@arlut.utexas.edu>; Date: Tue, 25 May 2004 23:01:06 -0500; Sorry, down here both terms are common as Argo is considered short for Argonaut. Stuart K5KVH _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.co; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-05/msg00863.html (8,133 bytes)
19. Re: [TenTec] Info on the Argonaut 515? (score: 1): Author: Dave Moorman <davemoorman@comcast.net>; Date: Wed, 26 May 2004 07:00:48 -0500; The Ten Tec Triton production run had come and gone before cell phones were invented, so I'd venture a guess that they were using the name on an earlier product. Dave Dave K9SW Downers Grove, Illinoi; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-05/msg00866.html (9,809 bytes)
20. Re: [TenTec] Info on the Argonaut 515? (score: 1): Author: "Winston F. Jones" <winjones@ix.netcom.com>; Date: Tue, 25 May 2004 22:06:12 -0400; As best I recall, the 515 came along in mid-80's, well after most of the demand for the Argonaut was gone. By this time, the Argosy had already come out and it was a smaller box, plus it offered a 50; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-05/msg00891.html (11,516 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]