Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Merger\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Merger\s*$/: 42 ]

Total 42 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [TenTec] Merger (score: 1): Author: "mcelmer1" <mcelmer1@netecin.net>; Date: Tue, 20 May 2014 19:24:40 -0600; One of these days, I will turn on the transceiver and there will be no signals anywhere. Either the operators are very old or SK. I run with a small group of about 15 or so and there 3 under the age; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00522.html (11,664 bytes)
22. Re: [TenTec] Merger (score: 1): Author: Cecil <chacuff@cableone.net>; Date: Tue, 20 May 2014 21:32:23 -0500; Oh don't read me wrong...never said the Orion was not a giant killer...it was. Keyword here is WAS. All the others mentioned are still being made and have some killer bells and whistles you would exp; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00524.html (11,503 bytes)
23. Re: [TenTec] Merger (score: 1): Author: "Jack Emerson" <w4tje@wiredog.com>; Date: Tue, 20 May 2014 22:41:36 -0400; Mike is right. I'll repeat what I said the other night: These are 2 great companies, combining them gives even greater potential. The problem is demographics. The FCC database may say ham radio is as; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00525.html (12,690 bytes)
24. Re: [TenTec] Merger (score: 1): Author: "Jack Emerson" <w4tje@wiredog.com>; Date: Tue, 20 May 2014 23:03:18 -0400; Cecil, I think your suggestion is dead on for my tastes; I consider the Orion and O2 to be top of the line sports cars. I love mine, best radio I've owned by far in 37 yrs as a ham. But I would love; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00526.html (13,094 bytes)
25. Re: [TenTec] Merger (score: 1): Author: "Wes Attaway $N5WA$" <wesattaway@bellsouth.net>; Date: Tue, 20 May 2014 22:45:04 -0500; I have been watching this thread with interest. I used to do a lot of M&A stuff (usually as the buyer) and there was always a reason for each deal but the reasons could be very different. It was not; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00527.html (15,171 bytes)
26. Re: [TenTec] Merger (score: 1): Author: Mike Chatfield <mikechat@embarqmail.com>; Date: Wed, 21 May 2014 07:01:50 -0500; I have been following this thread for a while. I too have an Orion II and a FTDX3000. With the exception of the DSP noise reduction on the 3000 the Orion is a FAR better receiver and rig overall. I u; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00535.html (13,931 bytes)
27. Re: [TenTec] Merger (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Wed, 21 May 2014 09:31:30 -0700; I like your analysis, Wes. A major problem that Ten Tec has is that over a period of about 15 years, the JA manufacturers have maintained their dominance of the low, middle, and high end of the marke; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00543.html (12,075 bytes)
28. Re: [TenTec] Merger (score: 1): Author: "R. Eric Sluder-W9WLW via TenTec" <tentec@contesting.com>; Date: Wed, 21 May 2014 13:06:16 -0400; Man... you guys keep tearing my heart out when you talk about the O2 like this... I don't own one, but am about to sell other things so I can. I'm still working on the business case for my presentati; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00548.html (14,007 bytes)
29. Re: [TenTec] Merger (score: 1): Author: george fritkin via TenTec <tentec@contesting.com>; Date: Wed, 21 May 2014 11:06:02 -0700 (PDT); I did not know the OMNI Vll came in kit form. So lets make a real comparison. Similar equipped K3s and O Vll, the K3 is a lot more money. Having both I say performance is comparable. Also I have; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00554.html (15,361 bytes)
30. Re: [TenTec] Merger (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Wed, 21 May 2014 11:10:00 -0700; Who said that it does? 73, Jim K9YC _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00555.html (10,149 bytes)
31. Re: [TenTec] Merger (score: 1): Author: Carl Moreschi <n4py3@earthlink.net>; Date: Wed, 21 May 2014 14:10:11 -0400; The Omni VII does not come as a kit. Carl Moreschi N4PY 58 Hogwood Rd Louisburg, NC 27549 www.n4py.com Give both companies the credit they are due. George, W6GF Man... you guys keep tearing my heart; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00556.html (14,972 bytes)
32. Re: [TenTec] Merger (score: 1): Author: george fritkin via TenTec <tentec@contesting.com>; Date: Wed, 21 May 2014 11:20:18 -0700 (PDT); In my opinion the O2 is a classic radio. And if you are looking for one, mine is NOT for sale And do what I did to get mine.......doing the dishes and trash for one year George, W6GF The Omni VII d; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00558.html (16,870 bytes)
33. Re: [TenTec] Merger (score: 1): Author: Stuart Rohre <rohre@arlut.utexas.edu>; Date: Wed, 21 May 2014 15:46:47 -0500; I just heard a talk, post Dayton, by one of the ARRL vice Directors. ARRL is hopeful for this merger to work to the benefit of hams, and for CQ to emerge from its restructuring as a viable magazine.; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00565.html (11,239 bytes)
34. Re: [TenTec] Merger (score: 1): Author: "Bob McGraw - K4TAX" <RMcGraw@Blomand.net>; Date: Wed, 21 May 2014 15:53:28 -0500; Man, you're an overpaid dishwasher and trash hauler. :-) 73 Bob, K4TAX -- Original Message -- From: "george fritkin via TenTec" <tentec@contesting.com> To: <n4py3@earthlink.net>; "Discussion of Ten-T; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00567.html (17,388 bytes)
35. Re: [TenTec] Merger (score: 1): Author: Jim Allen <jim.allen@longhornband.net>; Date: Wed, 21 May 2014 15:55:16 -0500; It's hard to justify getting into that market right now I would think. There is too much experimentation, too much make do with Linksys and other stuff, to know just what direction things will eventu; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00568.html (12,188 bytes)
36. Re: [TenTec] Merger (score: 1): Author: Cecil <chacuff@cableone.net>; Date: Wed, 21 May 2014 17:03:26 -0500; Well I for one am not happy with CQ at the moment. Not only do I subscribe to CQ but have subscribed to Pop Com for years. It just quit showing up...no explanation for months...then CQ went MIA. Fina; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00571.html (12,004 bytes)
37. Re: [TenTec] Merger (score: 1): Author: Stuart Rohre <rohre@arlut.utexas.edu>; Date: Wed, 21 May 2014 18:06:38 -0500; Good points on Broadband Hamnet as a new ham product, but TT could start with offering the entry level lower cost routers, as a retail source, and then make their money in the turn key offering of ev; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00572.html (9,290 bytes)
38. Re: [TenTec] Merger (score: 1): Author: TTMaven <jrichards@k8jhr.com>; Date: Wed, 21 May 2014 21:26:29 -0400; MY WIFE SUGGESTED I BUY THE ORION II. MAYBE YOUR XYL NEEDS TO CALL MINE ? ;-) We were talking about what was available, and what could do what. We were reviewing my product matrix, and comparing feat; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00573.html (11,500 bytes)
39. Re: [TenTec] Merger (score: 1): Author: george fritkin via TenTec <tentec@contesting.com>; Date: Wed, 21 May 2014 18:55:50 -0700 (PDT); It may not matter, but I agree 100%. We will be saying that about the O2 years from now. George, W6GF _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http:/; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00574.html (10,385 bytes)
40. Re: [TenTec] Merger (score: 1): Author: "R. Eric Sluder-W9WLW via TenTec" <tentec@contesting.com>; Date: Wed, 21 May 2014 22:01:37 -0400; Cecil, I'm with you and I miss Shannon's broadcast classics. Eric W9WLW Sent from my iPad _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contes; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00575.html (13,283 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 40
Page: [1] [2] [3]