Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+OMNI\s+VI\+\s+AUDIO\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+OMNI\s+VI\+\s+AUDIO\s*$/: 23 ]

Total 23 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Omni VI+ Audio (score: 1): Author: kg5u@hal-pc.org (Dale L. Martin); Date: Mon, 18 Jan 1999 15:30:55 -0600; I know I run the risk of getting flamed big-time here, but I gotta do it! A couple of months ago, I commented that I was hearing clicks in my headphones/speakers from my Omni VI+. Some said they hear; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-01/msg00381.html (8,389 bytes)
2. [TenTec] Omni VI+ Audio (score: 1): Author: kg5u@hal-pc.org (Dale L. Martin); Date: Mon, 18 Jan 1999 15:53:01 -0600; Of course, I blew it on one of the URL's to my .wav files. They should be: http://www.hal-pc.org/~kg5u/omni-hi.wav http://www.hal-pc.org/~kg5u/omni-lo.wav Sorry about that.... dale, kg5u -- FAQ on WW; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-01/msg00382.html (7,349 bytes)
3. [TenTec] Omni VI+ Audio (score: 1): Author: N4LQ@iglou.com (Steve Ellington N4LQ); Date: Mon, 18 Jan 1999 18:49:53 -0500; Sounds kinda like RF on the speaker leads. Have you tried reducing power to see if it still happens? If it quits, try bypassing your speaker leads at the speaker using a .01mfd cap. Steve N4LQ -- FAQ; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-01/msg00383.html (9,765 bytes)
4. [TenTec] Omni VI+ Audio (score: 1): Author: n0ru@neonramp.com (Robb Urie); Date: Mon, 18 Jan 1999 21:00:20 -0600; I have noticed the same thing on my 3 day old 6+. Hear it in speaker and headphones. I can turn the sidetone completly off and all I get is click, click. Robb -- To: <tentec@contesting.com> -- FAQ on; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-01/msg00384.html (9,813 bytes)
5. [TenTec] Omni VI+ Audio (score: 1): Author: kg5u@hal-pc.org (Dale L. Martin); Date: Mon, 18 Jan 1999 23:19:57 -0600; reducing power to leads at Steve, Thanks for the note. RF is not an issue. In fact, when I recorded both segments, I had set up the radio with the recently learned (learned by me, that is) procedure; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-01/msg00389.html (7,691 bytes)
6. [TenTec] Omni VI+ Audio (score: 1): Author: n4lq@iglou.com (Steve Ellington); Date: Tue, 19 Jan 1999 07:59:30 -0500 (EST); Well, it's time to get out the old scope and track down that click. You should be able to see that spike on the af amplifier easily. You may end up bypassing some leads on the af chip to ground with; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-01/msg00391.html (8,923 bytes)
7. [TenTec] OMNI VI+ audio (score: 1): Author: John Rippey <w3uls@3n.net>; Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2004 08:27:47 -0400; KE4VPN wrote: ". . . even on SSB it is fine, no pinched SSB here, sounds very nice to me." Me too. I don't understand why the INRAD audio mod was/is needed. 73, John, W3ULS __________________________; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-04/msg00109.html (6,466 bytes)
8. Re: [TenTec] OMNI VI+ audio (score: 1): Author: "Mike Brown" <k9mi@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2004 12:57:03 -0000; No problem with the audio here either. I don't care for the built in speaker, so I use an el cheapo RS that works fine. My Omni 6 opt 3 doesn't drift either. Oh no! Maybe mine is defective! Mike - K9; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-04/msg00110.html (7,897 bytes)
9. Re: [TenTec] OMNI VI+ audio (score: 1): Author: Robert & Linda McGraw K4TAX <RMcGraw@Blomand.Net>; Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2004 08:10:46 -0500; While the Omni VI+ has a great receiver, I find that the DSP processing, even though the NR is not selected, leaves a slight "gritty" sound to the audio. This is compared to either of my Paragon's, b; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-04/msg00112.html (7,920 bytes)
10. [TenTec] OMNI VI+ audio (score: 1): Author: "Rob Atkinson, K5UJ" <k5uj@hotmail.com>; Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2004 14:41:03 +0000; Part of the success with the Omni VI rx audio has to do with what the station you are listening to is transmitting. If you are copying a station that is txing at your rx bandwidth capability, he's go; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-04/msg00114.html (9,078 bytes)
11. [TenTec] OMNI VI+ audio (score: 1): Author: Barry N1EU <n1eu@yahoo.com>; Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2004 10:16:05 -0700 (PDT); The Omni VI+ receive audio bandwith is limited to 1600hz or so because of internal passive components (capacitors) and the audio signal passing through the notch filter and DSP ICs regardless of whet; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-04/msg00119.html (7,749 bytes)
12. Re: [TenTec] OMNI VI+ audio (score: 1): Author: Carter Grabarczyk <k8vt@ameritech.net>; Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2004 14:34:03 -0400; Rob Atkinson, K5UJ wrote: Same with this--after a week or two of hearing all the high and low frequencies in addition to the mid-range you won't want to go back to < 2.8 KHz. Rob, I guess I'm missing; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-04/msg00120.html (7,968 bytes)
13. [TenTec] OMNI VI+ audio (score: 1): Author: Barry N1EU <n1eu@yahoo.com>; Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2004 12:28:28 -0700 (PDT); In terms of what K5UJ and K8VT are discussing: one rig's "2.8Khz" receive selectivity is not equal to another's. There is an unbelievable difference between the Orion and Omni VI+ in this regard when; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-04/msg00121.html (7,764 bytes)
14. Re: [TenTec] OMNI VI+ audio (score: 1): Author: Mike Manship <mjmanship@iquest.net>; Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2004 15:12:11 -0500; Quoting Barry N1EU <n1eu@yahoo.com>: Barry, How does your Orion compare (fidelity-wise) to your modified Corsair ? 73 de Mike W9OJ mjmanship@iquest.net _______________________________________________; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-04/msg00122.html (8,137 bytes)
15. Re: [TenTec] OMNI VI+ audio (score: 1): Author: "Rob Atkinson, K5UJ" <k5uj@hotmail.com>; Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2004 22:28:19 +0000; Hi, I don't know what the percentage is. Thanks to N1EU for clarification on the Omni VI+ rx bandwidth. I either never knew or had forgotten that, and I assume it applies to the Omni VI option 3 also; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-04/msg00128.html (10,577 bytes)
16. [TenTec] OMNI VI+ audio (score: 1): Author: Barry N1EU <n1eu@yahoo.com>; Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2004 17:23:46 -0700 (PDT); W9OJ asked "How does your Orion compare (fidelity-wise) to your modified Corsair?" Mike, they're both exceptionally good: wide passband and very "transparent" sounding - easy to listen to for hours.; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-04/msg00131.html (8,607 bytes)
17. [TenTec] OMNI VI+ AUDIO (score: 1): Author: "yash@aol.com" <yash@aol.com>; Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2012 10:21:42 -0400 (EDT); Two questions,have a new to me ,OMNI VI+ , one of the earlier rigs ,no SM components. Iam using the rig with the matching supply/speaker. Iam not too happy with the audio from the speaker or even wit; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-09/msg00250.html (7,617 bytes)
18. Re: [TenTec] OMNI VI+ AUDIO (score: 1): Author: Barry N1EU <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2012 14:30:39 +0000; The Omni6 ssb rx audio always goes through the dsp circuit which steeply rolls off all audio below 260hz. No matter what you do, you're not going to get much low freq ssb rx audio out of the Omni6 re; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-09/msg00251.html (8,119 bytes)
19. Re: [TenTec] OMNI VI+ AUDIO (score: 1): Author: Dennis R Baumgarte <ae2ee@rochester.rr.com>; Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2012 11:51:38 -0400; On 09/17/2012 10:21, yash@aol.com wrote: Two questions,have a new to me ,OMNI VI+ , one of the earlier rigs ,no SM components. Iam using the rig with the matching supply/speaker. Iam not too happy wi; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-09/msg00252.html (8,118 bytes)
20. Re: [TenTec] OMNI VI+ AUDIO (score: 1): Author: John Oglesby <john91@charter.net>; Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2012 12:55:41 -0400; A couple of thoughts. First, the later VI's do have some surface mount boards. Second, the internal speaker is lousy and can be buzzy. Same issue for the PS speaker. I use the roofing filters for CW; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-09/msg00253.html (8,385 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]