Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Old\s+vs\s+New\s+\=\s+crunch\s+time\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Old\s+vs\s+New\s+\=\s+crunch\s+time\s*$/: 25 ]

Total 25 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Old vs New = crunch time (score: 1): Author: Roger Rippy <svtincup@yahoo.com>; Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2010 04:49:51 -0800 (PST); The thread last month regarding the Omni VI+ the best rig etc, certainly got me thinking about the next Ten Tec rig. Please keep in mind that I really like the "keep it simple" approach to most thing; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-02/msg00016.html (8,384 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] Old vs New = crunch time (score: 1): Author: John Farler <k4avx1@windstream.net>; Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2010 16:27:17 -0500; Roger, Just my opinions from operating many of these rigs, plus what I've read here and other places - I believe with older rigs in stepping up from the 540 (I have a 540), you wouldn't go wrong with; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-02/msg00021.html (10,994 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] Old vs New = crunch time (score: 1): Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>; Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2010 17:53:27 -0500; You do not really explain WHY you need a new radio at this time. Mere lapse of time is not a reason to buy a new radio. * Is there an unmet need a new rig would meet? * [...but don't tell that to MY; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-02/msg00022.html (8,740 bytes)
4. [TenTec] Old vs New = Crunch time (score: 1): Author: Roger Rippy <svtincup@yahoo.com>; Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2010 19:20:21 -0800 (PST); First I would like to thank all those who sent emails or responded on the list to my request for advice, opinions, and insight on the question of old vs new. K8JHR hit it right on the nail head, that; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-02/msg00026.html (8,744 bytes)
5. Re: [TenTec] Old vs New = Crunch time (score: 1): Author: "DAVID HELLER" <dtx@verizon.net>; Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2010 01:34:21 -0500; ( To you alone) -- I've owned some Jap rigs, a Triton, Omni D, Omni 6. I like traffic nets, general ragchew qso's, some low-key contesting - in short, general operating. Compared to the Japs the TT's; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-02/msg00031.html (10,008 bytes)
6. Re: [TenTec] Old vs New = crunch time (score: 1): Author: Mr Mike <kf8zn@yahoo.com>; Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2010 04:01:46 -0800 (PST); Roger, I have both an OMNI VI and a Pegasus. I would suggest you get the Jupiter, and computer control it. Having said that, it is a tough call between the 2 rigs. The Omni VI has Specifications th; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-02/msg00032.html (8,856 bytes)
7. Re: [TenTec] Old vs New = crunch time (score: 1): Author: "CSM$r$ Gary Huber - AB9M" <glhuber@msn.com>; Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2010 07:55:01 -0600; Roger, I have both a OMNI VI Plus and a Corsair II and have owned an OMNI D and a Paragon (all purchased new). Of the lot I'd recommend the Corsair II as the radio meeting your needs and expectations; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-02/msg00034.html (11,509 bytes)
8. Re: [TenTec] Old vs New = Crunch time (score: 1): Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>; Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2010 09:39:44 -0500; Then Go for it! ;-) (I love my Omni VII.... so count my vote for it, but as it is my very first transceiver, I am no expert.) == JHR == K8JHR hit it right on the nail head, that this is definitely ab; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-02/msg00035.html (8,200 bytes)
9. Re: [TenTec] Old vs New = crunch time (score: 1): Author: "Malcolm McLeman" <malcolm.mcleman@free.fr>; Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2010 17:58:25 +0100; Roger, Personally I think the Corsair2 must be well below your $600 dollar budget. I've owned both the C1 and C2. The C1 I got fairly cheap as the final transistors were shot, which I repaired. As it; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-02/msg00037.html (11,291 bytes)
10. Re: [TenTec] Old vs New = crunch time (score: 1): Author: "Gary Hoffman" <ghoffman@spacetech.com>; Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2010 12:08:48 -0500; I owned a pegasus and had fun operating it and controlling it with the computer, using Carl's excellent program. However, I am primarily a contester, and usually operate only on contest weekends, in; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-02/msg00038.html (10,346 bytes)
11. Re: [TenTec] Old vs New = crunch time (score: 1): Author: d.e.warnick@comcast.net; Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2010 18:10:42 +0000 (UTC); With a budget in the $600 to $1800 range, you can do quite well in a TT rig, Please understand that because of the way the protective circuitry in TT rigs is set up, it is best to run with a TT powe; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-02/msg00039.html (12,051 bytes)
12. Re: [TenTec] Old vs New = crunch time (score: 1): Author: Art Trampler <atrampler@att.net>; Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2010 11:22:06 -0800 (PST); The one item I might add to this discussion, having owned a Pegasus and now owning an Omni VI, Option 3, and having put good time on other radios such as a TS-870SAT, 756Pro 3, and K3: Identify you; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-02/msg00042.html (14,648 bytes)
13. [TenTec] Old vs New = crunch time (score: 1): Author: Roger Rippy <svtincup@yahoo.com>; Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2010 18:44:22 -0800 (PST); Once again thanks to all who took the time to either send me an email or respond to the list about the pros and cons of new vs old TT rigs. At first I probably would have agreed with Al N1MHC that I; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-02/msg00060.html (9,123 bytes)
14. Re: [TenTec] Old vs New = crunch time (score: 1): Author: "Dr. Gerald N. Johnson" <geraldj@weather.net>; Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2010 10:12:18 -0600; But that relaxation oscillator has one good feature. It starts and stops fast, so it doesn't hang behind fast keying. A low pass filter on the speaker can help it a lot. I'll have a circuit that I di; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-02/msg00067.html (10,569 bytes)
15. Re: [TenTec] Old vs New = crunch time (score: 1): Author: David Cuttler <davidcuttler@yahoo.com>; Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2010 21:54:54 -0800 (PST); I owned a Corsair II, and really loved it. I did need to rebuild the PTO, and lubed it with "Phil Grease". IT is used for bicycles, and never gave me any more issues. I had a display problem which I; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-02/msg00080.html (10,471 bytes)
16. Re: [TenTec] Old vs New = crunch time (score: 1): Author: "Art Trampler" <atrampler@att.net>; Date: Sat, 6 Feb 2010 00:09:04 -0600; Great observations. Thanks for sharing them. Now...if I sell my Omni VI.... I owned a Corsair II, and really loved it. I did need to rebuild the PTO, and lubed it with "Phil Grease". IT is used for b; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-02/msg00082.html (11,357 bytes)
17. Re: [TenTec] Old vs New = crunch time (score: 1): Author: Ronald Hands <rhands@mountaincable.net>; Date: Sat, 06 Feb 2010 19:26:21 -0500; It probably achieves the same effect as my MFJ DSP filter (I think it's a model 784b), which does a terrific job of smoothing the Corsair II side tone and also adds other bells and whistles such as s; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-02/msg00095.html (10,059 bytes)
18. Re: [TenTec] Old vs New = crunch time (score: 1): Author: "Dr. Gerald N. Johnson" <geraldj@weather.net>; Date: Sat, 06 Feb 2010 18:59:44 -0600; Except my passive LC filter introduces no DSP artifacts to the audio. No hum either. It does demand more power from the audio output stage though. In the Orion's DSP users can choose the number of st; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-02/msg00096.html (10,812 bytes)
19. Re: [TenTec] Old vs New = crunch time (score: 1): Author: "Malcolm McLeman" <malcolm.mcleman@free.fr>; Date: Sun, 7 Feb 2010 06:00:34 +0100; _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-02/msg00102.html (10,812 bytes)
20. [TenTec] Old vs New = Crunch time (score: 1): Author: Roger Rippy <svtincup@yahoo.com>; Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2010 08:50:28 -0800 (PST); Just a short note to say thanks to David (Ke6YX) regarding his comments on his Corsair II and his current rigs, including the Omni VII. I certainly appreciate the reason why you finally sold your Cor; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-02/msg00177.html (9,364 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]