Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Omni\s+6\+\s+question\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Omni\s+6\+\s+question\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Omni 6+ Question (score: 1): Author: duffyb01@fuse.net (J. Duffy Beischel); Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2001 18:24:07 -0500; O.K., those of you with the experience, what is going bad or wrong when you turn the tuning knob quickly and the frequency changes, but occasionally stops with the last digit flashing a bit but then; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-03/msg00215.html (10,061 bytes)
2. [TenTec] Omni 6+ Question (score: 1): Author: rich@w3zj.com (Richard B Drake); Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2001 22:58:40 -0500; I noticed that happening when I had the 10 minute ID warning enabled. If I happened to be spinning the dial when the warning sounded, it would cause a hesitation in the display as you described. I fi; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-03/msg00222.html (8,004 bytes)
3. [TenTec] Omni 6+ Question (score: 1): Author: w.marty.ray@delphiauto.com (w.marty.ray@delphiauto.com); Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 08:49:00 -0500; I have seen the intermittent tuning with my Omni VI+ also. It is a minor annoyance, but what if it gets worse? I guess I'll end up sending mine back before the warranty runs out. Mart y Ray N9SE -- F; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-03/msg00226.html (6,718 bytes)
4. [TenTec] Omni 6+ question (score: 1): Author: KD7EFQ@aol.com; Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2003 17:12:16 -0400; I have been doing some comparisons of Third order intercept numbers on QST reviews, but The manual for the 6+ and the QST numbers on the Omni 6+ just say +12db T.O.I. but does not say if it is measur; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-10/msg00008.html (6,983 bytes)
5. RE: [TenTec] Omni 6+ question (score: 1): Author: "John L Merrill" <jmerrill1@adelphia.net>; Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2003 18:55:31 -0400; Unless specified, the QST reviews are at 20khz as is the TT ones. Go to elecraft.com. They have a comparison of many radios there at different spacings. John N1JM I have been doing some comparisons o; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-10/msg00010.html (8,009 bytes)
6. Re: [TenTec] Omni 6+ question (score: 1): Author: "Steve Baron - KB3MM" <SteveBaron@StarLinX.com>; Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2003 20:52:04 -0000; See the ARRL test for the 2000 - contains a list of rigs including the VI Table 2 Dynamic Range Measurements at 5 kHz Spacing for Several Current HF Transceivers 5 kHz Dynamic Range (dB) Transceiver; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-10/msg00025.html (8,728 bytes)
7. Re: [TenTec] Omni 6+ question (score: 1): Author: "Steve Baron - KB3MM" <SteveBaron@StarLinX.com>; Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2003 20:48:40 -0000; Take a look at the ARRL test of the 2000, they include a table with the VI there: Table 2 Dynamic Range Measurements at 5 kHz Spacing for Several Current HF Transceivers 5 kHz Dynamic Range (dB) Tran; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-10/msg00026.html (9,756 bytes)
8. [TenTec] Omni 6+ question (score: 1): Author: KD7EFQ@aol.com; Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2003 19:41:33 EDT; Thanks for all the info everybody. I guess the question on the Third order intercept point of the 6+ was never tested at 5 Khz spacing, so It will remain a mystery. The reason I was curious is that o; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-10/msg00028.html (7,649 bytes)
9. Re: [TenTec] Omni 6+ question (score: 1): Author: "WA3FIY" <wa3fiy@radioadv.com>; Date: Fri, 03 Oct 2003 11:40:44 -0400; I think the intercept point is independent of the signal spacing, at least up to the bandwidth of the filter between the antenna and first active devices or mixer. Dynamic range is definitely a funct; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-10/msg00046.html (8,901 bytes)
10. [TenTec] Omni 6+ question (score: 1): Author: "A.W. B." <a7bull@hotmail.com>; Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2006 16:16:57 +0000; Can't speak to the SMD question specifically but I highly recommend the 600 hz roofing filter, if you are a CW op. I just bought an Omni 6+ a few weeks ago and installed the roofing filter (very easy; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-08/msg00575.html (6,846 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 10
Page: [1]