Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Omni\s+VI\s+Plus\s+freq\.\s+readout\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Omni\s+VI\s+Plus\s+freq\.\s+readout\s*$/: 34 ]

Total 34 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Omni VI Plus freq. readout (score: 1): Author: n4lq@iglou.com (n4lq@iglou.com); Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2002 11:11:51 -0400; Ok...Try setting up a sked with someone on PSK31 on a certain frequency. Have you ever looked at PSK on 20m? If your filter if opened up to a wide, 500hz, you may see about 5 signals on your waterfal; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-10/msg00015.html (12,364 bytes)
2. [TenTec] Omni VI Plus freq. readout (score: 1): Author: RMcGraw@Blomand.Net (Robert & Linda McGraw K4TAX); Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2002 21:22:18 -0500; Three questions: 1. When was the Onmi designed and when was the IC 756 Pro II designed? 2. Do you think time base and design technology stood still during this period? 3. Does the tuning knob on your; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-10/msg00039.html (13,298 bytes)
3. [TenTec] Omni VI Plus freq. readout (score: 1): Author: dhhdeh@concentric.net (David Hammond); Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2002 23:42:14 -0400; Bob, Your questions #1 and #2 have merit, no question about it. The third however reflects more on you than me and is really uncalled for. It helps to prove my comment on growing intolerance for opin; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-10/msg00040.html (15,091 bytes)
4. [TenTec] Omni VI Plus freq. readout (score: 1): Author: n4lq@iglou.com (n4lq@iglou.com); Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2002 11:31:57 -0400; 1. My TS-930 was designed in 1987 or so and it's readout is far more accurate than any Omni. 2. Design technology (as far as frequency accuracy) was quiet adequate in 1987. TenTec chose to continue m; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-10/msg00041.html (16,477 bytes)
5. [TenTec] Omni VI Plus freq. readout (score: 1): Author: aa4nn@earthlink.net (Joe Blackwell); Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2002 12:37:19 -0400; Hey, I'm hoping this thread about frequency accuracy is going to die, or maybe should die. Enough is enuff, already. Okay, so you have your rig down to 7.011.016 just for your own gratification. Then; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-10/msg00042.html (9,600 bytes)
6. [TenTec] Omni VI Plus freq. readout (score: 1): Author: w9ac@arrl.net (Paul Christensen); Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2002 12:49:15 -0400; Where the problem becomes apparent is when frequency error far exceeds the least significant display digit. In other words, if the display is meant to indicate an operating frequency down to 10Hz res; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-10/msg00043.html (10,571 bytes)
7. [TenTec] Omni VI Plus freq. readout (score: 1): Author: aa4nn@earthlink.net (Joe Blackwell); Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2002 13:10:12 -0400; So why do you quote my email on this? What does your reply have to do with the price of eggs. Joe, aa4nn To: <tentec@contesting.com> the least significant display digit. In other words, if the resolu; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-10/msg00045.html (10,930 bytes)
8. [TenTec] Omni VI Plus freq. readout (score: 1): Author: w4foa@voy.net (Tony Martin); Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2002 13:37:27 -0400; Hey Joe, Many be the night that I have awakened in a cold sweat wondering if my Omni 6+ has drifted off freq since my final QSO of the day. But, thank goodness, I have my trusty BC-221 military freq; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-10/msg00046.html (10,678 bytes)
9. [TenTec] Omni VI Plus freq. readout (score: 1): Author: k4beh@juno.com (k4beh@juno.com); Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2002 14:30:04 -0400; Children, CHILDREN ! Just sit down in the back seat and quit your arguing about frequency accuracy ! Don't make me have to stop this car! Pat - K4BEH _________________________________________________; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-10/msg00049.html (8,378 bytes)
10. [TenTec] Omni VI Plus freq. readout (score: 1): Author: WA3FIY@radioadv.com (WA3FIY); Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2002 15:22:38 -0400; I guess the thread will die when we get tired talking about it. That's the nice thing about these reflectors.............kind of market driven! :-) Frankly, I enjoy these technical topics, at least I; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-10/msg00054.html (9,834 bytes)
11. [TenTec] Omni VI Plus freq. readout (score: 1): Author: scott@wowpage.com (Scott Johnson); Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2002 15:27:17 -0400; I have to chuckle over all this. My first radio was a Ten-Tec Century 21, and it didn't even HAVE a digital frequency readout. I seem to recall having no trouble using it, regardless. Is this really; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-10/msg00055.html (19,456 bytes)
12. [TenTec] Omni VI Plus freq. readout (score: 1): Author: farson@shaw.ca (Adam Farson); Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2002 15:09:26 -0700; Gentlemen, Is it not high time we gave this melancholy thread the decent burial it so richly deserves? Best 73, Adam, VA7OJ/AB4OJ North Vancouver, BC, Canada http://www.qsl.net/ab4oj/; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-10/msg00059.html (8,154 bytes)
13. [TenTec] Omni VI Plus freq. readout (score: 1): Author: n4lq@iglou.com (Steve Ellington); Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2002 20:00:53 -0400; I've found this thread to be enlightening. Over the years we have seen huge improvements in dial accuracy with and TenTec has been no exception. From their PowerMite series with virtually no accuracy; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-10/msg00066.html (10,792 bytes)
14. [TenTec] Omni VI Plus freq. readout (score: 1): Author: Gary Hoffman" <ghoffman@spacetech.com (Gary Hoffman); Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2002 20:38:04 -0400; I must say that I agree that we are increasingly finding ourselves in a world devoid of tolerance. My suggestion is that, while we can't fix the whole world, we try to set a good example here. 73 de; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-10/msg00068.html (17,325 bytes)
15. [TenTec] Omni VI Plus freq. readout (score: 1): Author: RMcGraw@Blomand.Net (Robert & Linda McGraw K4TAX); Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2002 22:44:15 -0500; Nah, we just need to find another dead horse to whip. Anybody got one? Bob K4TAX; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-10/msg00072.html (8,749 bytes)
16. [TenTec] Omni VI Plus freq. readout (score: 1): Author: attorney@broadcast.net (Paul Christensen); Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2002 12:48:31 -0400; Where the problem becomes apparent is when frequency error far exceeds the least significant display digit. In other words, if the display is meant to indicate an operating frequency down to 10Hz res; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-10/msg00121.html (11,000 bytes)
17. [TenTec] Omni VI Plus freq. readout (score: 1): Author: farson@shaw.ca (Adam Farson); Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2002 16:42:47 -0700; Hi George, And in addition, my old IC-781 met NATO specs for frequency stability, accuracy and repeatability. I concur with your comments re PRO/PRO II. Cheers for now, 73, Adam VA7OJ/AB4OJ --Origina; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-09/msg00001.html (10,075 bytes)
18. FW: [TenTec] Omni VI Plus freq. readout (score: 1): Author: farson@shaw.ca (Adam Farson); Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2002 16:48:56 -0700; << Would someone kindly explain to me why I need to know my frequency with such precision? >> Simple answer: If your transmitter's frequency error puts you out of the band (or sub-band), you are oper; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-09/msg00002.html (8,538 bytes)
19. [TenTec] Omni VI Plus freq. readout (score: 1): Author: dhhdeh@concentric.net (David Hammond); Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2002 21:24:00 -0400; Hi Everyone, Once again I am compelled to comment on this thread having spent a lot of time seeking to improve this very specific Omni VI problem. It's real and it does exist. After 5 1/2 years of Om; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-09/msg00004.html (11,473 bytes)
20. [TenTec] Omni VI Plus freq. readout (score: 1): Author: w9ac@arrl.net (Paul Christensen); Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2002 21:40:04 -0400; I'll second that, including the upgrade to the TCXO. Back in 1997, I replaced both BFO crystals with a set from JAN in Fort Meyers, FL. Only...I was seeking to stabilize the Omni's microchirp proble; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-09/msg00006.html (8,788 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]