Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Omni\s+VI\s+confusion\s*$/: 19 ]

Total 19 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Omni VI confusion (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
Date: Sun, 09 Jan 2005 09:54:27 -1000
You guys have got me confused. "I notice that my used (new to me) Omni VI Plus upgraded to option 3" I thought that an option 3 upgrade was something that could be done to a non-plus version of an Om
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00282.html (7,802 bytes)

2. RE: [TenTec] Omni VI confusion (score: 1)
Author: n1eu@netscape.net (Barry N1EU)
Date: Sun, 09 Jan 2005 15:15:02 -0500
You're correct Ken. Any Omni 6 with an option upgrade is not an Omni 6+. Some owners/sellers improperly refer to their upgraded sixes as pluses. 73, Barry N1EU _______________________________________
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00284.html (7,835 bytes)

3. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI confusion (score: 1)
Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
Date: Sun, 9 Jan 2005 15:33:23 -0500
And there is no rechargeably battery in the Omni 6 series of rigs. At one time Ten Tec performed a mod on the Omni 6 so it would have +12vdc applied to the xtal oven,(to help improve frequency stabil
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00285.html (9,159 bytes)

4. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI confusion (score: 1)
Author: Jim Lowman <jmlowman@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Sun, 09 Jan 2005 13:19:10 -0800
I thought that, with the option 3 upgrade to the original Omni VI, it became an VI Plus from an electronic standpoint. Scott, can you weigh in on this again? 73 de Jim - AD6CW Barry N1EU wrote: Ken B
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00287.html (8,205 bytes)

5. RE: [TenTec] Omni VI confusion (score: 1)
Author: "NJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2005 22:23:54 -0800
As I recall, Ten-Tec called all 563's with any upgrade option an OmniVI+. One of the options (I think it was #2) even included a little Omni VI+ badge to paste over the old Omni VI label on the front
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00289.html (7,860 bytes)

6. RE: [TenTec] Omni VI confusion (score: 1)
Author: n1eu@netscape.net (Barry N1EU)
Date: Sun, 09 Jan 2005 18:17:40 -0500
Rick, I don't think this is correct. I think Steve N4LQ described it accurately. To the best of my knowledge, Ten-Tec never called a 563 of any ilk an Omni VI+. 73, Barry N1EU _______________________
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00291.html (8,625 bytes)

7. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI confusion (score: 1)
Author: W9MWS@aol.com
Date: Sun, 9 Jan 2005 18:28:09 EST
I thought that, with the option 3 upgrade to the original Omni VI, it became an VI Plus from an electronic standpoint. Scott, can you weigh in on this again? 73 de Jim - AD6CW _______________________
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00293.html (7,882 bytes)

8. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI confusion (score: 1)
Author: "Steve N4LQ" <n4lq@iglou.com>
Date: Sun, 9 Jan 2005 18:40:06 -0500
Well sort of...There's lots of little things TenTec did when they came out with the 564, VI+. For example. The option caused some birdies. They cut cable 34 between the logic board and 9mhz IF and in
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00295.html (10,015 bytes)

9. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI confusion (score: 1)
Author: Jerry Volpe <kg6tt@tomorrowsweb.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 00:25:37 -0800
When I was looking to buy an Omni VI Plus I called Ten-Tec and talked to the support engineer for the Omni's (name omitted). I was told that for all intents and purposes the Omni-VI with Option Pack
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00302.html (8,242 bytes)

10. RE: [TenTec] Omni VI confusion (score: 1)
Author: "NJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
Date: Sun, 9 Jan 2005 09:48:47 -0800
Barry, I said I don't recall all the details, but I'm 100% certain that one of the options included the little Omni VI+ badge. I pretty sure it was Option #2 but not 100% certain. 73 Rick badge Rick,
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00303.html (9,366 bytes)

11. RE: [TenTec] Omni VI confusion (score: 1)
Author: "John L Merrill" <jmerrill1@adelphia.net>
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 06:34:47 -0500
FWIW,I've had 2 Opt3 pass through me and neither one said OMNIVI Plus on them. 73, John N1JM East Amherst, NY Barry, I said I don't recall all the details, but I'm 100% certain that one of the option
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00305.html (10,182 bytes)

12. RE: [TenTec] Omni VI confusion (score: 1)
Author: n1eu@netscape.net (Barry N1EU)
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 07:06:26 -0500
Same here (owned 2 opt 3's). There was a factory sticker on the rear that indicated the option 3 was installed but I don't think that is what Rick is referring to. 73, Barry N1EU ____________________
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00306.html (11,963 bytes)

13. RE: [TenTec] Omni VI confusion (score: 1)
Author: "n4lq" <n4lq@iglou.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 07:49:01 -0500
I've got 2 OMNI VI option 3's and neither has any VI+ badge on them. I think the decals mentioned came with the Option 1 or 2 upgrade which was intended to be performed by the user. It included stick
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00309.html (12,380 bytes)

14. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI confusion (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 06:59:39 -1000
John L Merrill wrote: FWIW,I've had 2 Opt3 pass through me and neither one said OMNIVI Plus on them. Wow! That must have hurt! Did you swallow them whole, or one resistor at a time? _________________
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00323.html (9,162 bytes)

15. RE: [TenTec] Omni VI confusion (score: 1)
Author: "John L Merrill" <jmerrill1@adelphia.net>
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 12:10:07 -0500
hardi har har Wow! That must have hurt! Did you swallow them whole, or one resistor at a time? _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.c
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00325.html (9,506 bytes)

16. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI confusion (score: 1)
Author: "n4lq" <n4lq@iglou.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 12:33:21 -0500
There must be an easier way! _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00327.html (9,372 bytes)

17. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI confusion (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Edwards" <kd2e@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 12:02:43 -0500
Hurt yes, but I wasn't thinking about the swallowing part!!! ....Dave -- Original Message -- From: "Ken Brown" <ken.d.brown@verizon.net> To: <tentec@contesting.com> Sent: Monday, January 10, 2005 11:
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00330.html (9,247 bytes)

18. RE: [TenTec] Omni VI confusion (score: 1)
Author: "NJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
Date: Sun, 9 Jan 2005 18:04:48 -0800
My final word on this topic: Since I have never actually "seen" a 563 with any option installed and all my comments are based upon what I read many years ago, the bottom line is (for this topic) I do
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00332.html (10,256 bytes)

19. RE: [TenTec] Omni VI confusion (score: 1)
Author: "ron" <roncasa@verizon.net>
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 14:24:44 -0500
Hahahahahaha! Ron wb1hga You guys have gud sense of humor! Wow! That must have hurt! Did you swallow them whole, or one resistor at a time? _______________________________________________ TenTec mail
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00335.html (8,843 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 19
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu