Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Orion\s+II\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Orion\s+II\s*$/: 151 ]

Total 151 documents matching your query.

121. Re: [TenTec] Orion II (score: 1): Author: "ROD" <w3krq@dejazzd.com>; Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 17:27:23 -0500; I DID NOT LIKE THE WATER FALL AS SOON AS I SAW IT I WENT BACK TO THE OLD UPDATE. AND I AM NOT THE ONLY ONE. Hi John, I hear you about the 566. V2.044A is very good, but please don't forget about the; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-02/msg00338.html (8,514 bytes)
122. Re: [TenTec] Orion II (score: 1): Author: John Molenda <cdistflatfoot@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 17:53:48 -0500; On 2/18/2011 5:27 PM, ROD wrote:Well I must say that I did enjoy the waterfall display ! However I fear that we will be waiting for some time to see a update to the Orion II per John's last . John Mo; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-02/msg00339.html (9,554 bytes)
123. Re: [TenTec] Orion II (score: 1): Author: kc9cdt@aol.com; Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 18:30:09 -0500 (EST); So, the newest OII code does not have the waterfall?? If that's true..why not?? 73, Lee On 2/18/2011 5:27 PM, ROD wrote:Well I must say that I did enjoy the waterfall display ! However I fear that we; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-02/msg00341.html (10,237 bytes)
124. Re: [TenTec] Orion II (score: 1): Author: "Ron Castro" <ronc@sonic.net>; Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 17:50:36 -0800; No, it does not. In the original incarnation, it never really worked the way it was intended so it was taken out. It may rise again if there is enough interest, but I have to admit, while it was an o; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-02/msg00347.html (8,396 bytes)
125. Re: [TenTec] Orion II (score: 1): Author: Kim Elmore <cw_de_n5op@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 20:43:07 -0600; I suppose it's a matter of taste. I liked the waterfall display, but I would have preferred it to be a photo negative of what was implemented: no signal is dark while signal is light. Still, I look f; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-02/msg00349.html (9,335 bytes)
126. Re: [TenTec] Orion II (score: 1): Author: "Ron Castro" <ronc@sonic.net>; Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 21:06:41 -0800; The 'photo negative' is the main reason I didn't like it since everyone is used to the PSK-31 waterfalls that usually have a dark background and a lighter signal trace. It's possible that TT tried th; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-02/msg00353.html (10,922 bytes)
127. Re: [TenTec] Orion II (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2011 10:33:26 -0500 (EST); In 2.041XT, the waterfall was not instead of the sweep display, it was a menu-driven option. If you would rather have the sweep display, you could choose that. What I liked about the waterfall was th; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-02/msg00358.html (9,346 bytes)
128. Re: [TenTec] Orion II (score: 1): Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>; Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2011 17:39:38 -0500; Novice Question 2765 ... Showing my ignorance, and not owning an Orion II ... yet... (I have an Omni VII)... could someone please explain how one uses the waterfall in a real world situation? I have; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-02/msg00366.html (11,414 bytes)
129. Re: [TenTec] Orion II (score: 1): Author: "Dr. Gerald N. Johnson" <geraldj@weather.net>; Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2011 18:57:26 -0600; The waterfall display is very handy finding signals on a nearly dead band, especially VHF and microwave (where lacking frequency stability and precision might find a station more than a few kHz away; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-02/msg00369.html (9,827 bytes)
130. Re: [TenTec] Orion II (score: 1): Author: kc9cdt@aol.com; Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2011 20:31:19 -0500 (EST); I am very dissappointed it is not in the latest code. 73, Lee The waterfall display is very handy finding signals on a nearly dead band, especially VHF and microwave (where lacking frequency stabilit; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-02/msg00370.html (10,032 bytes)
131. Re: [TenTec] Orion II (score: 1): Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>; Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2011 00:56:18 -0500; THANKS !! That sounds much more useful than my Omni VII band scope display - which is handy enough on its own. There are some questions dealing with this on the Extra Exam, but my Gordon West audio t; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-02/msg00372.html (10,807 bytes)
132. [TenTec] Orion II (score: 1): Author: k4elo@fastmail.fm; Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2013 11:28:15 -0600; I haven't been keeping up with TT in the last few years. Just wondering if the internal hardware on a current Orion II is the same as on one 3 or 4 years old. Almost sounds like it might have changed; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-01/msg00147.html (7,075 bytes)
133. Re: [TenTec] Orion II (score: 1): Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>; Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2013 15:02:23 -0500; Golly, I think so. There IS a new and improved replacement second receiver option, and there have been several firmware updates for the rig, but I think the radio is, essentially, the same as it was; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-01/msg00157.html (8,105 bytes)
134. Re: [TenTec] Orion II (score: 1): Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>; Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2013 13:36:35 -0500; Oops - poor proofreading. I meant to say, "... I don't think so..." Haste made waste, again. -- K8JHR -- On 1/22/2013 3:02 PM, Richards wrote: Golly, I think so. There IS a new and improved replaceme; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-01/msg00166.html (7,699 bytes)
135. [TenTec] Orion II (score: 1): Author: Tom Horton <k5iid@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2015 16:06:18 +0000 (UTC); My dream has finally come true. I just bought an Orion II. I have wanted one for years. I am interested in hearing any comments positive or negative about it. Thanks, Tom K5IID Finally there is a bi; /archives//html/TenTec/2015-04/msg00038.html (7,170 bytes)
136. Re: [TenTec] Orion II (score: 1): Author: John Bescher via TenTec <tentec@contesting.com>; Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2015 12:58:15 -0400; "Better late than never".....it was a sad day for me when Tentec stopped manufacturing the Orion II. I have one and have enjoyed it immensely. Of course it depends where you are coming from...dark ag; /archives//html/TenTec/2015-04/msg00040.html (8,734 bytes)
137. Re: [TenTec] Orion II (score: 1): Author: Paul Gates via TenTec <tentec@contesting.com>; Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2015 00:38:22 +0000 (UTC); John I am glad you like the Orion II. I never made enough money to have an Orion during my working life. I have a TenTec at present which is the 580 Delta which serves my needs as a retired pastor.; /archives//html/TenTec/2015-04/msg00046.html (9,935 bytes)
138. [TenTec] Orion II (score: 1): Author: <gyates@dreamscape.com>; Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2015 19:20:32 -0400; Hi, My name is Greg, WB2BIN, and I am new to the forum. I was wondering has anyone had audio problems with the Orion II? Thanks, Greg _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing li; /archives//html/TenTec/2015-08/msg00025.html (6,666 bytes)
139. Re: [TenTec] Orion II (score: 1): Author: Barry N1EU <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2015 00:13:06 +0000; Perhaps you can describe in detail your "audio problems." 73, Barry N1EU _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/; /archives//html/TenTec/2015-08/msg00027.html (7,867 bytes)
140. Re: [TenTec] Orion II (score: 1): Author: <gyates@dreamscape.com>; Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2015 20:47:56 -0400; Barry, the audio just goes down by 90 to 95% and sometimes turning it off and on it comes back to normal. I sent it in for for repair and they had it for 4 months and verified the problem but when th; /archives//html/TenTec/2015-08/msg00028.html (8,488 bytes)

Current List: 121 - 140
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]