Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Orion\s+II\s+tuning\s+questions\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Orion\s+II\s+tuning\s+questions\s*$/: 29 ]

Total 29 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [TenTec] Orion II Tuning Questions (score: 1): Author: Sinisa Hristov <shristov@ptt.yu>; Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2006 17:23:09 -0500; On the contarry, I find it very reasonable to adjust BW, RIT or something similar while sending in order to ensure better reception. 73, Sinisa YT1NT, VE3EA __________________________________________; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-01/msg00905.html (8,832 bytes)
22. Re: [TenTec] Orion II tuning questions (score: 1): Author: Sinisa Hristov <shristov@ptt.yu>; Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2006 17:25:45 -0500; Of course it IS a problem - it may be too late. Most of other radios make it possible, so it's probably not a top notch science anyway. 73, Sinisa YT1NT, VE3EA ______________________________________; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-01/msg00906.html (8,513 bytes)
23. Re: [TenTec] Orion II Tuning Questions (score: 1): Author: "Martin, AA6E" <martin.ewing@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2006 17:23:25 -0500; Yes, besides if you're a QSK person, you're spending a few ms in receive between each code element! The interrupt service argument is good, except that the time to service an interrupt is (or should; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-01/msg00907.html (10,106 bytes)
24. Re: [TenTec] Orion II tuning questions (score: 1): Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>; Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2006 18:12:38 -0600; This thread is getting past the point of reason. But .. BW, PBT, AF gain, RF gain, POWER, or other functions controlled by MULTI -- appear to have no effect. The HI/LO cut control does not work whil; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-01/msg00909.html (9,171 bytes)
25. Re: [TenTec] Orion II Tuning Questions (score: 1): Author: "Henry Pfizenmayer" <pfizenmayer@worldnet.att.net>; Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2006 18:08:16 -0700; Sometimes I wonder why I ever bother to reply to anything on this reflector - none of this is a "concern" to me . I fully understand how to avoid these "problems" . I was just trying to participate i; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-01/msg00911.html (13,000 bytes)
26. Re: [TenTec] Orion II Tuning Questions (score: 1): Author: CATFISHTWO@aol.com; Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2006 20:12:24 EST; I know what you mean Hank, my comment was directed at the question of why you would spin the tuning knob while sending cw.. sometimes the threads on this reflector get a bit bizarre.. I'm hanging on; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-01/msg00912.html (8,897 bytes)
27. Re: [TenTec] Orion II tuning questions (score: 1): Author: "Henry Pfizenmayer" <pfizenmayer@worldnet.att.net>; Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2006 18:15:34 -0700; Grant -I think it is interesting also - but I am tired of the smart alec lectures from the reflector - so from now on all my comments will be to individuals or to TenTec directly rather than on the r; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-01/msg00913.html (9,711 bytes)
28. Re: [TenTec] Orion II tuning questions (score: 1): Author: "Stuart Rohre" <rohre@arlut.utexas.edu>; Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2006 19:36:02 -0600; This thread has revealed the "dirty little secret" of ANY digital microcomputer controlled radio: You give up some simultaneous functions when you go to a serially controlled, clocked, and programmed; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-01/msg00915.html (9,455 bytes)
29. [TenTec] Orion II tuning questions (score: 1): Author: "Ron Castro" <ronc@sonic.net>; Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2006 09:07:55 -0800; Lee: I think we will both be getting our O II's at the about the same time. The sales department told me last week that the next production run will start shipping mid February. That's just 2.5 weeks; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-01/msg00922.html (10,069 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 29
Page: [1] [2]