Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Orion\s+vs\s+SDR\-1000\s*$/: 32 ]

Total 32 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Orion vs SDR-1000 (score: 1)
Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2005 16:20:18 -0400
Orion has some new competition! See the ARRL Product Review in October QST. http://www2.arrl.org/members-only/prodrev/pdf/pr0510.pdf IMDDR3 at 2 kHz is 99 db versus Orion's ~92 dB at the same spacing
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-08/msg00541.html (7,726 bytes)

2. Re: [TenTec] Orion vs SDR-1000 (score: 1)
Author: K9RT@aol.com
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2005 16:30:23 EDT
Here's the deal for a literate computer user like yourslef. Half the price of an Orion and just as good. _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-08/msg00542.html (6,899 bytes)

3. Re: [TenTec] Orion vs SDR-1000 (score: 1)
Author: K9RT@aol.com
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2005 16:32:13 EDT
Please disregard my response a few minutes ago. Meant to forward to someone. Poor computer skills for sure. Dick K9RT _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contes
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-08/msg00543.html (6,697 bytes)

4. Re: [TenTec] Orion vs SDR-1000 (score: 1)
Author: Duane A Calvin <ac5aa@juno.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2005 18:27:33 -0500
Did they ever get teh CW operation up to par? 73, Duane -- Duane Calvin, AC5AA Austin, Texas http://home.austin.rr.com/ac5aa _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-08/msg00559.html (7,492 bytes)

5. Re: [TenTec] Orion vs SDR-1000 (score: 1)
Author: "Stuart Rohre" <rohre@arlut.utexas.edu>
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2005 19:02:26 -0500
The SDR 1000 is built here in Austin. They have a Direct Conversion receiver, thus there are some limits to performance. In addition, they are at the mercy of the sound card used when it comes to iss
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-08/msg00560.html (8,049 bytes)

6. Re: [TenTec] Orion vs SDR-1000 (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2005 23:11:52 -0500
Flex staffers/reps were still downplaying CW performance (that means that when the subject came up there were a lot of averted glances, mumbling and equivocating), at least as of Dallas Ham-Com in J
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-08/msg00567.html (7,965 bytes)

7. [TenTec] Orion vs SDR-1000 (score: 1)
Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2005 07:21:13 -0400
AC5AA : NQ5T: when the subject came up there were a lot of averted glances, mumbling and equivocating), at least as of Dallas Ham-Com in June. The October QST review is fairly positive on non-QSK CW
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-08/msg00568.html (7,499 bytes)

8. Re: [TenTec] Orion vs SDR-1000 (score: 1)
Author: "Martin, AA6E" <martin.ewing@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2005 17:01:38 -0400
Seems to me that the open source software development for the SDR-1000 is a big plus with few negatives. You get faster development (more man-hours of development and test), faster bugfixes, and lots
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-08/msg00574.html (9,890 bytes)

9. Re: [TenTec] Orion vs SDR-1000 (score: 1)
Author: Bill NY9H <ny9h@arrl.net>
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2005 17:03:20 -0500
I MAY BE MISTAKEN, MY MOTOROLA REPEATER BASE STATION FEEDS LESS THEN .6 WATT TO THE FINAL AMP SECTION.. FOR 24X7 100WATTS..CONTINUOUS DUTY,,,. AT LEAST MY K2 100 WATT POWER AMP FEEDS DATA BACK TO TH
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-08/msg00575.html (8,483 bytes)

10. Re: [TenTec] Orion vs SDR-1000 (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2005 17:12:22 -0500
By definition, the "value" of an SDR is going to be in the software, and not in the diminishing number of hardware bits that front-end it. Software, as protected Intellectual Property (IP), is where
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-08/msg00576.html (9,304 bytes)

11. Re: [TenTec] Orion vs SDR-1000 (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Baron - KB3MM" <SteveBaron@StarLinX.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2005 22:42:42 -0000
no. _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-08/msg00578.html (9,219 bytes)

12. Re: [TenTec] Orion vs SDR-1000 (score: 1)
Author: CATFISHTWO@aol.com
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2005 00:24:51 EDT
In some respects, it is a bit of concern that they may cut into the market for Orion and Orion II, BUT then again, perhaps another entry into the soft ware defined radio world will allow us to advanc
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-08/msg00581.html (8,525 bytes)

13. [TenTec] Orion vs SDR-1000 (score: 1)
Author: Lee Crocker <w9oy@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2005 05:40:18 -0700 (PDT)
<Here's the deal for a literate computer user like yourself. Half the price of an Orion and just as When I look at the keying waveform in the review article the first dit shows up on the antenna AFTE
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-08/msg00582.html (8,988 bytes)

14. Re: [TenTec] Orion vs SDR-1000 (score: 1)
Author: Tommy <aldermant@alltel.net>
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2005 18:31:02 -0400
Of course the Orion firmware is not and probably never will be open source. But it sure doesn't cost Orion users very much! Tommy - W4BQF _______________________________________________ TenTec mailin
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-08/msg00583.html (10,090 bytes)

15. Re: [TenTec] Orion vs SDR-1000 (score: 1)
Author: "David W LeJeune, Sr" <lejeuned@centurytel.net>
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2005 19:14:03 -0500
If Open Source software will put SDR vendors out of business, how do you explain the success of RedHat, SUSE and others that are benefiting from the Open Source movement started by Linux? Dave K5WNV
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-08/msg00584.html (10,805 bytes)

16. Re: [TenTec] Orion vs SDR-1000 (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Azlin, N4ZPT" <tom@n4zpt.org>
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2005 21:08:55 -0400
Well, I can download my Orion software for free, but cost me $4k to buy the hardware! I also have an orginal SDR-1000 and plan to play with that a lot. In addition to running GNURadio and the USRP bo
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-08/msg00586.html (8,627 bytes)

17. Re: [TenTec] Orion vs SDR-1000 (score: 1)
Author: "Martin, AA6E" <martin.ewing@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2005 22:06:54 -0400
There is no free lunch. Sometimes there is a "pre-paid lunch". Or maybe software development work is paid for out of current sales revenue. I.e., if they stop selling Orions (I or II), how much more
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-08/msg00587.html (9,056 bytes)

18. Re: [TenTec] Orion vs SDR-1000 (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2005 23:06:04 -0500
Actually not. You paid for the software in the $4K (except you got only a "runtime" version of the software, and no source) :-) Grant/NQ5T _______________________________________________ TenTec mail
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-08/msg00588.html (8,402 bytes)

19. Re: [TenTec] Orion vs SDR-1000 (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Notarius" <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2005 08:37:37 -0400
Well, I disagree a touch that the SDR-1000 will "cut into" the Orion's market per se. Now if we were talking about the Jupiter, I might agree with you. In other words, those who would be interested i
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-08/msg00589.html (9,725 bytes)

20. Re: [TenTec] Orion vs SDR-1000 (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Baron - KB3MM" <SteveBaron@StarLinX.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2005 12:38:25 -0000
Thats good. But it sure doesn't cost Orion users very much! not as that and to more a they happy but if _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http:
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-09/msg00000.html (9,214 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]
This search system is powered by Namazu