Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+PARAGON\s+vs\s+OMNI\s+V\s+VI\s+VI\+\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] PARAGON vs OMNI V VI VI+ (score: 1)
Author: "kartooo@netzero.net" <kartooo@netzero.net>
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2006 22:35:27 GMT
Hi, Never see anything about the paragon vs other rigs on here. I just recently purchased a paragon and i love it. I use it only on ssb and i have all the filters and gehiel chip. I have owned the to
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00496.html (7,118 bytes)

2. Re: [TenTec] PARAGON vs OMNI V VI VI+ (score: 1)
Author: "Vic Klein" <vhklein@ptd.net>
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2006 18:28:15 -0500
As Ten Tec's first synthesized HF radio, I think some maligned the Paragon unfairly. There were some teething issues (reminds me of what you read on the Orion) due to some mechanical soldering proble
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00500.html (8,785 bytes)

3. Re: [TenTec] PARAGON vs OMNI V VI VI+ (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2006 14:05:27 -1000
Hi Larry, The Paragon is a general coverage rig, and the Omni VI is not. Being general coverage requires wider bandpass filters in the receiver front end, given the same number of bands to cover 160
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00504.html (10,384 bytes)

4. Re: [TenTec] PARAGON vs OMNI V VI VI+ (score: 1)
Author: "kartooo@netzero.net" <kartooo@netzero.net>
Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2006 02:00:54 GMT
hi Ken, Thank you very much for the info. It does make for a more expensive radio to build. I had a TS-870 and realized the difference between the dsp in the if as opposed to the dsp in the audio sta
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00508.html (12,228 bytes)

5. Re: [TenTec] PARAGON vs OMNI V VI VI+ (score: 1)
Author: Robert & Linda McGraw K4TAX <RMcGraw@Blomand.Net>
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2006 21:09:09 -0600
I have had the Paragon and indeed it is one fine radio. That is until I obtained an Omni VI Plus. Great radio indeed. Decided after a bit that I wanted a general coverage receiver and thus sold the O
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00515.html (11,478 bytes)

6. Re: [TenTec] PARAGON vs OMNI V VI VI+ (score: 1)
Author: "jack" <jfriend31@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2006 20:19:24 -0700
the 75S3B was the best receiver i ever owned until the Orion graced my desk. i never could afford the matching tx so finally sold the rx. now i wish i had the 75S3C. jack ak7o _______________________
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00516.html (12,938 bytes)

7. Re: [TenTec] PARAGON vs OMNI V VI VI+ (score: 1)
Author: Travis Martin <tmartin198@cox.net>
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2006 21:28:44 -0600
I haven't seen any reply to my post a few hours ago; isn't there anyone here who can comment from experience on the relative quality of the audio between the S-Line and TenTec rigs? I'm a big fan of
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00517.html (14,733 bytes)

8. Re: [TenTec] PARAGON vs OMNI V VI VI+ (score: 1)
Author: Robert & Linda McGraw K4TAX <RMcGraw@Blomand.Net>
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2006 21:26:42 -0600
After all there's only 46 years difference in the age of the radios. I'd hope that maturity and technology has moved ahead a wee bit during the 46 year period. Yes, the audio and filters on the 75S-3
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00518.html (8,353 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu