Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Questions\s+about\s+NR\s+i\.e\.\s+Orion\s*$/: 41 ]

Total 41 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Questions about NR i.e. Orion (score: 1)
Author: "OE3ZK Gerhard" <oe3zk@aon.at>
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2006 10:49:32 +0100
Hi! I observe many specialists on this reflector so that I cannot hesitate to ask a few WHY questions about DSP noise reduction. Why " with weak signals it is harder for the DSP NR to determine what
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00986.html (6,877 bytes)

2. [TenTec] Questions about NR i.e. Orion (score: 1)
Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2006 09:30:52 -0500
Hi Gerhard, You should first read page 45 of the Orion II Operating Manual: http://radio.tentec.com/cms-files/566_manual_release2_0106.pdf ** "DSP noise reduction in the ORION II interacts somewhat w
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00987.html (12,553 bytes)

3. Re: [TenTec] Questions about NR i.e. Orion (score: 1)
Author: "geraldj" <geraldj@storm.weather.net>
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2006 13:45:17 -0600
<SNIP> NOT AT ALL! All the good NR techniques use the high correlation of a desired signal and the relative lack of correlation of noise to discriminate between the two. At least that's what the book
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg01003.html (11,824 bytes)

4. Re: [TenTec] Questions about NR i.e. Orion (score: 1)
Author: Sinisa Hristov <shristov@ptt.yu>
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2006 17:21:53 -0500
NR is an adaptive filter, and adaptive filter IS a filter, its sole purpose being that of bandwidth reduction. What makes is different from "ordinary" filters is the adaptive method of tuning, and n
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg01006.html (8,034 bytes)

5. Re: [TenTec] Questions about NR i.e. Orion (score: 1)
Author: Lin Davis <linbdavis@earthlink.net>
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2006 21:40:33 -0500
Bill, W4ZV There is an important difference between the NR filter (Adaptive Predictor with Leaky LMS) and just narrowing the passband with the BW control; the NR will quickly increase attenuation dur
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg01009.html (8,129 bytes)

6. Re: [TenTec] Questions about NR i.e. Orion (score: 1)
Author: Sinisa Hristov <shristov@ptt.yu>
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2006 21:56:31 -0500
How quick is "quickly" in real Orion operation? 73, Sinisa YT1NT, VE3EA _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/l
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg01010.html (7,232 bytes)

7. Re: [TenTec] Questions about NR i.e. Orion (score: 1)
Author: Kc9cdt@aol.com
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2006 12:58:57 EST
That may be the way it used to work, As I remember 1.371 it was. The OII does not get 'VERY QUIET' anymore.... What has happened is TT rewrote it all (V2) and now things are not the same. IMHO most s
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg01011.html (7,379 bytes)

8. [TenTec] Questions about NR i.e. Orion (score: 1)
Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 07:18:03 -0500
period between CW elements and during pauses/low level points in speech Good question Sinisa. At reasonable CW speeds, this would need to be in the order of milliseconds to quiet noise between "dit"
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg01017.html (8,749 bytes)

9. Re: [TenTec] Questions about NR i.e. Orion (score: 1)
Author: Sinisa Hristov <shristov@ptt.yu>
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 11:21:58 -0500
MDS, S/N and similar measurements with NR on must be peformed completely with the signal present, and not by switching the signal on and off. If the signal goes off, NR would readapt, so the sytem be
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg01018.html (8,135 bytes)

10. Re: [TenTec] Questions about NR i.e. Orion (score: 1)
Author: K4IA@aol.com
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 11:38:08 EST
I submit the only way to check the NR function is by listening. It either works or it doesn't. It hasn't worked since version 1.371. K4ia "Buck" Fredericksburg, Virginia USA _________________________
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg01019.html (7,411 bytes)

11. [TenTec] Questions about NR i.e. Orion (score: 1)
Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 12:05:22 -0500
Sinisa replied: must be performed completely with the signal present, and not by switching the signal on and off. I agree. I meant with the signal always present and DSP BW always = 100 Hz, but with
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg01021.html (8,578 bytes)

12. Re: [TenTec] Questions about NR i.e. Orion (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 11:36:48 -0600
I've been poking at NR on and off for a couple of days now on 2.032. Using an Elecraft N-gen noise generator to a Daven RF attenuator (to control the fixed output of the N-gen), with an 8640B provid
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg01024.html (9,726 bytes)

13. Re: [TenTec] Questions about NR i.e. Orion (score: 1)
Author: <k6kdk@k6kdk.net>
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 14:22:42 -0800
Ahhhh Hummm... I agree w/ "Buck".. (speaking as a software-type here..) a true NR system implemented in software is capable of "intelligently manipulating" noise and signal in a way that can not be d
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg01029.html (12,379 bytes)

14. Re: [TenTec] Questions about NR i.e. Orion (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 16:58:58 -0600
Bit by bit? Really? Did you patent that yet :-) Define "works". Give me a definition that I could use to hang my hat on, so I could tell what NR products work, or don't by that definition. Aren't yo
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg01030.html (8,895 bytes)

15. Re: [TenTec] Questions about NR i.e. Orion (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 13:35:46 -1000
Hi, Depends how and where you you connect the scope, and how you use the scope. If you monitor an analog audio signal before digitization and also after the DSP NR when it is analog audio again, usin
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg01031.html (9,596 bytes)

16. Re: [TenTec] Questions about NR i.e. Orion (score: 1)
Author: <k6kdk@k6kdk.net>
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 15:45:27 -0800
Well actually, yes. We looked at an "information frame" of 8 bits and made determinations about each "frame", and applied "exterior intelligence" (to coin a phrase) upon each frame, but certainly we
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg01032.html (8,920 bytes)

17. Re: [TenTec] Questions about NR i.e. Orion (score: 1)
Author: "Gary Hoffman" <ghoffman@spacetech.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 19:03:10 -0500
Incidentally, I also have professional experience with adaptive noise elimination. I agree completely with the comments below. Has nothing to do with bandwidth as measured on a scope. Obviously, we a
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg01033.html (15,150 bytes)

18. Re: [TenTec] Questions about NR i.e. Orion (score: 1)
Author: "Gary Hoffman" <ghoffman@spacetech.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 19:06:24 -0500
Yes Grant...I can reply to this one.... It is really bit by bit. Regards, Gary so you _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg01034.html (9,776 bytes)

19. Re: [TenTec] Questions about NR i.e. Orion (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 20:10:16 -0600
I'll be anxious to see such a commercialized system for SSB, for example, that can "simply" delete all of the "noise bits". I could really use that the next time a storm rolls through north Texas. G
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg01036.html (9,083 bytes)

20. Re: [TenTec] Questions about NR i.e. Orion (score: 1)
Author: Lin Davis <linbdavis@earthlink.net>
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 21:07:45 -0500
Gary, I'm interested in learning more about this technique. Can you recommend any reference material on the subject? Thanks, Lin WB1AIW _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg01037.html (16,865 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu