Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Rig\s+in\s+the\s+middle\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Rig\s+in\s+the\s+middle\s*$/: 25 ]

Total 25 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Rig in the middle (score: 1): Author: crobson@erie.net (Chris Robson); Date: Wed, 18 Jun 1997 18:53:18 -0400; Just a thought... After reading Scott's post in regards to the Argo being discontinued, maybe there could be a midrange rig between the Scout(which I own) and the Omni 6(which I also own). I know a n; /archives//html/TenTec/1997-06/msg00100.html (8,241 bytes)
2. [TenTec] Rig in the middle (score: 1): Author: dwright@microagesf.com (David Wright); Date: Wed, 18 Jun 1997 16:19:57 -0700; I second the motion (arm raising).... Small, slightly larger than Scout size full power (5-100w) mobile rig 10-160m. Spare rig, Dxpedition, mobile, Field Day, Camping, etc. Price range $1.2K - 1.6K.; /archives//html/TenTec/1997-06/msg00101.html (9,738 bytes)
3. [TenTec] Rig in the middle (score: 1): Author: k5rov@worldnet.att.net (James Parsons); Date: Wed, 18 Jun 1997 18:27:59 -0500; I agree, but don't let it have the VFO system of the Scout. I have had three Scouts, all of which worked fine on SSB. But at 25-30 WPM, CW, Those little rigs drifted right out of the other station's; /archives//html/TenTec/1997-06/msg00103.html (11,172 bytes)
4. [TenTec] Rig in the middle (score: 1): Author: kg5u@hal-pc.org (Dale Martin); Date: Wed, 18 Jun 1997 19:18:56 -0500; On Wednesday, June 18, 1997 18:19 PM, David Wright[SMTP:dwright@microagesf.com] wrote: And computer controllable -- for 2-radio contesting. 73 Dale Martin, KG5U kg5u@hal-pc.org http://www.hal-pc.org/; /archives//html/TenTec/1997-06/msg00104.html (8,714 bytes)
5. [TenTec] Rig in the middle (score: 1): Author: k5rov@worldnet.att.net (James Parsons); Date: Wed, 18 Jun 1997 20:37:38 -0500; Hi, Bob... I always used an external keyer, mainly because I like the memorys. I hate calling CQ by hand....Hi. I use the CMOS II and the CMOS III keyers. But the trouble was at its worse when using; /archives//html/TenTec/1997-06/msg00106.html (10,700 bytes)
6. [TenTec] Rig in the middle (score: 1): Author: gelang@worldnet.att.net (GENE LANGENDORFF); Date: Wed, 18 Jun 1997 22:03:33 -0700; I've had the same thought for a long time now. It seems that offering only two rigs with approximate prices of $500 and $2500 is just *too* much spread! I would dearly love to enjoy the performance o; /archives//html/TenTec/1997-06/msg00110.html (10,307 bytes)
7. [TenTec] Rig in the middle (score: 1): Author: vhatley@flash.net (Vernon A. Hatley); Date: Thu, 19 Jun 1997 08:53:54; only two just for Gene, I have suggested a reissue of the Corsair series a couple of times on the list and have never received a reason from Ten Tec as to why they can't or won't do it. There would b; /archives//html/TenTec/1997-06/msg00112.html (9,566 bytes)
8. [TenTec] Rig in the middle (score: 1): Author: owen@piper.eeel.nist.gov (James C. Owen, III); Date: Thu, 19 Jun 1997 10:08:20 -0500 (EST); Been following this thread and must say I agree with everything I've read. But a few thoughts of my own. I keep thinking how nice it would be for TT to come out with an all band kit. Say a kit of the; /archives//html/TenTec/1997-06/msg00114.html (10,035 bytes)
9. [TenTec] Rig in the middle (score: 1): Author: km5av@prysm.net (Scott J. Royle); Date: Thu, 19 Jun 1997 10:21:47 -0500 (CDT); band split freq. it isn't absolutely necessary. How about making a small 100-200 watt amp for the scout and maybe a remote vfo. These are just ideas popping into my head to help fuel this thread. I; /archives//html/TenTec/1997-06/msg00115.html (11,096 bytes)
10. [TenTec] Rig in the middle (score: 1): Author: ataylor@midas.llnl.gov (Allan G. Taylor); Date: Thu, 19 Jun 1997 08:48:23 -0700 (PDT); Jim K4CGY and the Tentec gang: My spontaneous CW speed is between 27 and 32 wpm. I have held off buying a Scout as a backup rig just because the Scout HAS a drift problem that remains uncorrected at; /archives//html/TenTec/1997-06/msg00116.html (9,266 bytes)
11. [TenTec] Rig in the middle (score: 1): Author: larryd@bright.net (Larry DiGioia); Date: Thu, 19 Jun 1997 19:47:11 -0400; only two just Personally, I would like to see an Omni-VI RECEIVER. 73's, ||Larry|| N8KU == STUDIO - D "As Seen on TV" All exact science is dominated by the idea of approximation. Bertrand Russell (18; /archives//html/TenTec/1997-06/msg00122.html (9,752 bytes)
12. [TenTec] rig in the middle (score: 1): Author: scotty@facade.adm.clarkson.edu (Glenn E. Scott); Date: Thu, 19 Jun 1997 10:55:42 EDT; I have been following along on the discussion of mid-priced radio's and I guess I have to agree. Ten Tec needs to have a mid priced rig. I have an Argossy 525, a Delta 580, a Delta II, along with 40; /archives//html/TenTec/1997-06/msg00126.html (10,113 bytes)
13. [TenTec] Rig in the middle (score: 1): Author: km5av@prysm.net (Scott J. Royle); Date: Fri, 20 Jun 1997 01:40:59 -0500 (CDT); I usually do not participate much on the reflector except to read the mail but I have really enjoyed this thread. It seems we have two schools here, one is to enhance the scout and two, to reintroduc; /archives//html/TenTec/1997-06/msg00130.html (9,834 bytes)
14. [TenTec] Rig in the middle (score: 1): Author: prvalko@Oakland.edu (Paul R. Valko); Date: Fri, 20 Jun 1997 09:06:28 -0400 (EDT); Hi Scott, Sounds like you just described the Omni IV ++!!! 73 =paul= w8kc collector of TenTecs and other fine plastics -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm Submissions: tentec@conte; /archives//html/TenTec/1997-06/msg00135.html (10,864 bytes)
15. [TenTec] Rig in the middle (score: 1): Author: seay@Alaska.NET (Del Seay); Date: Fri, 20 Jun 1997 06:10:44 -0700; Sounds like a request for TT to lower the OMNI-6 price. de KL7HF -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm Submissions: tentec@contesting.com Administrative requests: tentec-REQUEST@cont; /archives//html/TenTec/1997-06/msg00136.html (10,614 bytes)
16. [TenTec] Rig in the middle (score: 1): Author: km5av@prysm.net (Scott J. Royle); Date: Fri, 20 Jun 1997 10:18:29 -0500 (CDT); Scott writes again; Hi Paul, Not really, this rig would not be microproccessor controlled. It would not have any memories, computer control, or direct digital entry. The Saturn would be more like an; /archives//html/TenTec/1997-06/msg00137.html (11,332 bytes)
17. [TenTec] Rig in the Middle (score: 1): Author: steve@austin.ibm.com (Steve Runyon WQ5G 512-838-7008); Date: Fri, 20 Jun 97 11:17:41 -0500; Yes, it should have an optional 2nd VFO with the capability to listen to both frequencies simultaneously. This one feature is the main thing that has kept me from upgrading from my Omni D with ext V; /archives//html/TenTec/1997-06/msg00141.html (9,293 bytes)
18. [TenTec] RIG IN THE MIDDLE (score: 1): Author: DHHDEH@concentric.net (David H. Hammond); Date: Fri, 20 Jun 1997 21:31:52 +0000; You can add my vote to the "Rig in the Middle" discussions for a Gold Run of the Corsair II. Would buy one in a New York Minute. What to change? Not very much. Leave the PTO in. Like the quiet. Will; /archives//html/TenTec/1997-06/msg00148.html (9,484 bytes)
19. [TenTec] Rig in the Middle (score: 1): Author: jkoppi@pclink.com (Joseph Koppi); Date: Fri, 20 Jun 1997 23:05:07 -0600; Regarding the forthcoming new Ten-Tec Saturn, I just wanted to add a comment or two prior to final design changes and production tooling. Some of these points have been touched on by others, some hav; /archives//html/TenTec/1997-06/msg00150.html (9,944 bytes)
20. [TenTec] RIG IN THE MIDDLE (score: 1): Author: bames@mecasw.com (bames@mecasw.com); Date: Sat, 21 Jun 1997 08:27:21 -0400; About the "quiet" rx. I was wondering what would be the difference in what I hear from my Argo rx if it had a synthesized osc instead of the PTO. Any thoughts? Bill KB1LG -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.co; /archives//html/TenTec/1997-06/msg00152.html (8,510 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]