Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+S\-meter\s+and\s+RF\s+Gain\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+S\-meter\s+and\s+RF\s+Gain\s*$/: 18 ]

Total 18 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] S-meter and RF Gain (score: 1): Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2006 12:48:51 -0500; W4CAK: working like it does in the foreign imports. The lower the RF gain the higher the s meter will be stuck. Toby, you mean you don't like Collins,Hammarlund, Hallicrafters, Drake, etc? It's how S; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00282.html (7,596 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] S-meter and RF Gain (score: 1): Author: "Scott Harwood" <scotth@hsc.edu>; Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2006 13:40:02 -0500; _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00284.html (9,295 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] S-meter and RF Gain (score: 1): Author: "Toby Pennington" <toby423@earthlink.net>; Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2006 13:41:09 -0500; Bill, I have seen these comments or arguments before about the RF gain and s meter, and I never had any problems setting the RF gain or threshold, In fact I use an old version of the firmware 1.367 w; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00285.html (9,995 bytes)
4. Re: [TenTec] S-meter and RF Gain (score: 1): Author: Barry Gross <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2006 14:01:55 -0500; I must confess that I also prefer that the s meter resting point not move upwards with decreasing RF Gain. It's not a huge deal with me, however. I can't imagine setting RF Gain using an s meter - I'; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00286.html (7,949 bytes)
5. Re: [TenTec] S-meter and RF Gain (score: 1): Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>; Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2006 11:17:17 -0800; There are plusses and minuses on both sides of the argument. The reason it does this is because T-T bowed to much user complaining and/or confusion about Threshold, and somewhere along the line (don; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00287.html (7,974 bytes)
6. Re: [TenTec] S-meter and RF Gain (score: 1): Author: Duane - N9DG <n9dg@yahoo.com>; Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2006 11:36:07 -0800 (PST); Sounds to me like another example of something that should in reality be a user settable choice in the setup menu somewhere. It really shouldn't have to be just one way *or* the other, this is a soft; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00288.html (10,191 bytes)
7. Re: [TenTec] S-meter and RF Gain (score: 1): Author: "Carl Moreschi" <n4py@arrl.net>; Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2006 14:41:45 -0500; Toby, In the old versions, although the S meter still operated from S0, with the RF gain was reduced, the S meter dropped in value and was always wrong for all signals. With the new RF gain S meter i; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00289.html (12,704 bytes)
8. [TenTec] S-meter and RF Gain (score: 1): Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2006 15:35:15 -0500; N1EU: - I'll always just use my ear. I feel the same about zero-beating but some like a visual indicator. It doesn't matter to me much one way or the other but I don't see the downside to having the; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00290.html (7,732 bytes)
9. Re: [TenTec] S-meter and RF Gain (score: 1): Author: ---***--- <inventor61@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2006 15:38:43 -0500; S-meter or RF gain: either-or? ...what I'd like to know is ... why can't this be a user-defined option? When the radio is a computer, there's no reason you can't choose what you want, or at least,sel; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00291.html (8,484 bytes)
10. Re: [TenTec] S-meter and RF Gain (score: 1): Author: Sinisa Hristov <shristov@ptt.yu>; Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2006 16:00:25 -0500; In order to be useful, S meter movement must be synchronized with gain decrease caused by either AGC or manual RF GAIN. That's how it works in "ordinary" receivers. If the current Orion implementatio; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00292.html (8,381 bytes)
11. Re: [TenTec] S-meter and RF Gain (score: 1): Author: John Merrill <jmerrill1@adelphia.net>; Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2006 15:43:21 -0500; It seems to me if you decrease rf gain so should signal levels decrease hence lower s-meter readings. I liked that way in the OmniVI and as I remember in the other Omnis and Corsairs. John N1JM _____; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00293.html (12,120 bytes)
12. [TenTec] S-meter and RF Gain (score: 1): Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2006 15:50:36 -0500; NQ5T: does this is because T-T bowed to much user complaining and/or confusion about Threshold, and somewhere along the line (don't recall which release) tied Threshold and RF Gain together. Unless I; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00294.html (8,883 bytes)
13. Re: [TenTec] S-meter and RF Gain (score: 1): Author: Mike Gorniak <mgorniak@genesiswireless.us>; Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2006 15:44:03 -0600; Bingo! 73, Mike NM7X _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00295.html (8,611 bytes)
14. Re: [TenTec] S-meter and RF Gain (score: 1): Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>; Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2006 14:00:00 -0800; Scrambled is a kind way to put it. More like brain dead :-) Grant/NQ5T _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/l; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00297.html (7,283 bytes)
15. Re: [TenTec] S-meter and RF Gain (score: 1): Author: "Joseph A. & Ruth O. Ryan" <ablee@bellsouth.net>; Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2006 17:40:19 -0500; Many thanks, Bill....Appreciate your comments. You're right...73's Joe, KX4JR _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mai; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00300.html (10,079 bytes)
16. Re: [TenTec] S-meter and RF Gain (score: 1): Author: "Ron Castro" <ronc@sonic.net>; Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2006 15:06:41 -0800; I like it the way it is since setting the AGC shows you visually where the threshold has been set, and as you point out Carl, that accuracy of the reading is not changed by the RF gain setting for si; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00303.html (14,959 bytes)
17. Re: [TenTec] S-meter and RF Gain (score: 1): Author: "James Duffer" <dufferjames@hotmail.com>; Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2006 21:23:59 -0600; snip snip Varying the rf gain shouldn't vary the strength of the signal received. I recall an alignment procedure for the s meter where a 50 microvolt signal applied to the receivers input would prod; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00346.html (9,253 bytes)
18. Re: [TenTec] S-meter and RF Gain (score: 1): Author: "Mike Hyder -N4NT-" <mike_n4nt@charter.net>; Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 22:27:02 -0500; ANYTHING will be a problem for many on this list. 73, Mike N4NT snip snip Varying the rf gain shouldn't vary the strength of the signal received. I recall an alignment procedure for the s meter where; /archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00351.html (9,576 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 18
Page: [1]