Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Signal\s+to\s+noise\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Signal\s+to\s+noise\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Signal to noise (score: 1): Author: Andy Flessner <k9arm1@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2014 11:40:15 -0500; With my limited setups, I never really experienced reduced signal to noise, some antennas are said to be less noisy, but it seems like there's some extra loss involved with most. The small receiving; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-09/msg00121.html (7,187 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] Signal to noise (score: 1): Author: John <k4avx1@windstream.net>; Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 13:41:10 -0400; When I used to operate mobile, I noticed the same thing. Also, receiving was good, even with the short whips. Guess they are hi-Q if resonant. Noise was always a problem. Been a long time - I'd end u; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-09/msg00123.html (8,564 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] Signal to noise (score: 1): Author: "Bob McGraw - K4TAX" <RMcGraw@Blomand.net>; Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 12:48:17 -0500; I usually will stop to talk. Very rarely will I engage a QSO while in motion. Besides, I seem to recall state law requires both hands on the steering wheel unless required for vehicle operation. To m; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-09/msg00124.html (9,806 bytes)
4. Re: [TenTec] Signal to noise (score: 1): Author: "R. Eric Sluder via TenTec" <tentec@contesting.com>; Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 15:07:49 -0400; I talk on 70cm most days to and from work. I feel quite comfortable doing so and feel that I know what is going on around me as well. When texting first became a rage and I didn't know better I had a; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-09/msg00125.html (12,224 bytes)
5. Re: [TenTec] Signal to noise (score: 1): Author: Clayton Brantley via TenTec <tentec@contesting.com>; Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 12:40:58 -0700; Bob: I saw two girls in a Jeep the other day and BOTH were using a cell phone. Do you think they were talking to each other? HI I have made the same comment about the driver is the only one that know; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-09/msg00126.html (10,786 bytes)
6. Re: [TenTec] Signal to noise (score: 1): Author: John <jh.graves@verizon.net>; Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 16:05:52 -0400; But, What about a driver who is using his/her cell phone to talk to an inibriate? Never happens, right? John WA1JG Bob: I saw two girls in a Jeep the other day and BOTH were using a cell phone. Do yo; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-09/msg00127.html (11,205 bytes)
7. Re: [TenTec] Signal to noise (score: 1): Author: Richards <jrichards@k8jhr.com>; Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 18:31:36 -0400; Maybe I'm not very talented, but I'd say anything that requires is to concentrate and look away from the field of view for driving is dangerous. I don't trust myself now to dial around, check radio; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-09/msg00128.html (9,013 bytes)
8. Re: [TenTec] Signal to noise (score: 1): Author: Richards <jrichards@k8jhr.com>; Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 18:32:53 -0400; Bob: I saw two girls in a Jeep the other day and BOTH were using a cell phone. Do you think they were talking to each other? HI -- Er... um... only if they were BLOND! ;-) -- Anonymous - K8JHR -- ..; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-09/msg00129.html (8,051 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]