I talk on 70cm most days to and from work. I feel quite comfortable doing so
and feel that I know what is going on around me as well.
When texting first became a rage and I didn't know better I had a couple of
near misses with guard rails and such before I realized it was stupid to do.
Now it's illegal in Indiana to text and drive.
Maybe I'm not very talented, but I'd say anything that requires is to
concentrate and look away from the field of view for driving is dangerous.
My 2 mtr/440 rig is in set and forget it mode and I have to never look at it.
The volume is on the hand mic and I know where it is by feel if I have to turn
it down.
I use to run HF mobile a lot and talk from Indiana to Texas most of the way
years ago. I don't trust myself now to dial around, check radio settings, etc.
and drive. It's gotta be a set and forget deal for me anymore.
-Eric
W9WLW
> On Sep 11, 2014, at 1:48 PM, "Bob McGraw - K4TAX" <RMcGraw@Blomand.net> wrote:
>
> I usually will stop to talk. Very rarely will I engage a QSO while in
> motion. Besides, I seem to recall state law requires both hands on the
> steering wheel unless required for vehicle operation. To make that comply, I
> use an over-the-ear mike and VOX.
>
> Have you ever noticed that when there are two people in the car, the driver
> is always on the cell phone and the passenger is just sitting there idle?
> Based on recent studies, they report one is safer with a drunk driver behind
> the wheel than one that is talking on the cell phone. Scary!
>
> 73
> Bob, K4TAX
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "John" <k4avx1@windstream.net>
> To: <tentec@contesting.com>
> Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2014 12:41 PM
> Subject: Re: [TenTec] Signal to noise
>
>
>> When I used to operate mobile, I noticed the same thing. Also, receiving was
>> good, even with the short whips. Guess they are hi-Q if resonant. Noise was
>> always a problem. Been a long time - I'd end up in the ditch or over the
>> hill these days!
>>
>> John, K4AVX
>>
>>> Message: 1
>>> Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2014 11:40:15 -0500
>>> From: Andy Flessner<k9arm1@gmail.com>
>>> To:tentec@contesting.com
>>> Subject: [TenTec] Signal to noise
>>> Message-ID:
>>> <CAHs5tMvJXiTsptQURWywh42asyd20CU=TUY85ww7LQvvq0Z6xg@mail.gmail.com>
>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>>>
>>> With my limited setups, I never really experienced reduced signal to noise,
>>> some antennas are said to be less noisy, but it seems like there's some
>>> extra loss involved with most. The small receiving loops are known for
>>> better s/n, but I've never used one. Since I operate mostly mobile, where I
>>> notice it is going under larger bridges, the external noise from power
>>> lines, etc disappears briefly and signals come through better. Signals are
>>> probably reduced, too, from the antenna mismatch, but I'm not looking at
>>> the S meter. There are some places in the country, when driving, that are
>>> just plain quiet, interstate roads, etc, where I see noise drop to zero.
>>> Need a QTH there. I have found a few places to park and operate.......
>>>
>>> Of course, RF gain settings on the rig help, too.
>>>
>>> Andy K9ARM
>> _______________________________________________
>> TenTec mailing list
>> TenTec@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
|