Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+So\s+\*That\'s\*\s+Why\s+They\s+Measure\s+That\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+So\s+\*That\'s\*\s+Why\s+They\s+Measure\s+That\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] So *That's* Why They Measure That (score: 1): Author: wb2vuf@qsl.net (Bwana Bob); Date: Mon Jun 2 22:40:40 2003; My guess is that most other manufacturers assume that the vast majority of hams have no interest in cw. Bob WB2VUF; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-06/msg00093.html (7,867 bytes)
2. [TenTec] So *That's* Why They Measure That (score: 1): Author: alforol@hotmail.com (Frank alforo); Date: Tue Jun 3 01:29:45 2003; The ARRL test of the highly touted Icon 756PRO11 shows the first TWO dits are shortened. 73, AL _________________________________________________________________ Help STOP SPAM with the new MSN 8 and; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-06/msg00102.html (7,076 bytes)
3. [TenTec] So *That's* Why They Measure That (score: 1): Author: wn3vaw@fyi.net (Ron Notarius WN3VAW); Date: Tue Jun 3 18:41:54 2003; Interesting notion. CW is alive and well, and still a significant portion of HF activity. Yet most (overseas) manufacturers would assume that most amateurs have little or no interest in it? IF that a; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-06/msg00120.html (9,009 bytes)
4. [TenTec] So *That's* Why They Measure That (score: 1): Author: farson@shaw.ca (Adam Farson); Date: Tue Jun 3 21:04:22 2003; Hi Ron, It hurts to admit this, but I believe that in the matter of CW capability we are up against the ugly realities of the marketplace. The amateur segment is only a part of the major Japanese rad; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-06/msg00130.html (8,195 bytes)
5. [TenTec] So *That's* Why They Measure That (score: 1): Author: n9dg@yahoo.com (Duane Grotophorst); Date: Wed Jun 4 00:47:57 2003; That is precisely one of the reasons why I would like to see a more open architecture to radio design. No one group of engineers anywhere in the world can possibly know what everyone of us out here i; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-06/msg00135.html (9,267 bytes)
6. [TenTec] So *That's* Why They Measure That (score: 1): Author: al_lorona@agilent.com (al_lorona@agilent.com); Date: Fri May 30 23:11:30 2003; One of the customary measurements in the ARRL product reviews of amateur transceivers is a screen shot of the transmitted CW waveform. In general, Ten Tec radios test favorably while other radios fre; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-05/msg01175.html (8,052 bytes)
7. [TenTec] So *That's* Why They Measure That (score: 1): Author: ken.d.brown@verizon.net (Ken Brown); Date: Sat May 31 00:05:40 2003; Right on Al. Ten-Tec's legendary QSK is not an incredible technological breakthrough. Nor does it require more expensive parts to implement. It is just plain and simple good design. There is no good; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-05/msg01178.html (7,078 bytes)
8. [TenTec] So *That's* Why They Measure That (score: 1): Author: ve1adh@yahoo.ca (David McClafferty); Date: Sat May 31 12:19:42 2003; My Pegsus will turn a dah into two dits if I run other powerful software on the same computer. It would drop out in the middle of a dah because the computer was too busy and RS232 comunication was lo; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-05/msg01188.html (9,199 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]