Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Sorry\s+for\s+my\s+post\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Sorry\s+for\s+my\s+post\s*$/: 14 ]

Total 14 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Sorry for my post (score: 1): Author: wb9iog@revealed.net (MIKE SOUHRADA); Date: Tue Feb 4 11:42:30 2003; This reflector is funny the reply to doesn't seem to work normally. Was meant to be private! Mike; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-02/msg00164.html (7,356 bytes)
2. [TenTec] Sorry for my post (score: 1): Author: KD5NWA@cbayona.com (KD5NWA); Date: Tue Feb 4 11:49:48 2003; There are two kinds of replies, "reply" and "reply to all" check your settings and make sure that selecting reply does not reply to all parties. Cecil KD5NWA; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-02/msg00165.html (8,090 bytes)
3. [TenTec] Sorry for my post (score: 1): Author: rich@1967z28.com (Rich McCabe); Date: Tue Feb 4 11:53:07 2003; Glad it wasn't. I enjoyed it immensely :) ~r; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-02/msg00166.html (8,348 bytes)
4. [TenTec] Sorry for my post (score: 1): Author: jmerrill1@adelphia.net (John L Merrill); Date: Tue Feb 4 11:59:48 2003; I think without noticed, the list manager changed the "reply to". The reply now goes to the list and not the individual. This reflector is funny the reply to doesn't seem to work normally. Was meant; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-02/msg00168.html (8,672 bytes)
5. [TenTec] Sorry for my post (score: 1): Author: ascanand@harris.com (Scanandoah, Alan); Date: Tue Feb 4 12:11:40 2003; Delving into the message headers, tentec@contesting.com is in the "Reply To" field, rather than the address of the original sender. Perhaps something has been reconfigured at the server end. Al, K2ZN; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-02/msg00170.html (8,457 bytes)
6. [TenTec] Sorry for my post (score: 1): Author: RMcGraw@Blomand.Net (Robert & Linda McGraw K4TAX); Date: Tue Feb 4 12:13:01 2003; I've noticed that too. Thus I find it necessary to edit the address when I use only the REPLY command. 73 Bob, K4TAX reply To: <tentec@contesting.com>; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-02/msg00171.html (9,649 bytes)
7. [TenTec] Sorry for my post (score: 1): Author: geraldj@isunet.net (Dr. Gerald N. Johnson, electrical engineer); Date: Tue Feb 4 12:13:55 2003; This reflector is set up with a REPLY-TO which overrides anything a browser can do and so all replies go only to the reflector. To reply to an individual off list, one must manually copy and past tha; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-02/msg00172.html (8,742 bytes)
8. [TenTec] Sorry for my post (score: 1): Author: geraldj@isunet.net (Dr. Gerald N. Johnson, electrical engineer); Date: Tue Feb 4 12:29:57 2003; Having Reply-To enabled tends to cause more responses to go to the list that should be off list, and causes more "sorry for my post" posts. And on some lists can cause moderator complaints about off; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-02/msg00174.html (8,575 bytes)
9. [TenTec] Sorry for my post (score: 1): Author: n4lq@iglou.com (n4lq); Date: Tue Feb 4 12:30:52 2003; It won't matter what you select. Everything goes to the list unless you edit the TO: field. Someone needs to fix this back the way it wuz....; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-02/msg00175.html (9,065 bytes)
10. [TenTec] Sorry for my post (score: 1): Author: res0wsci@verizon.net (WILLIAM MANSEY; WA2PVK); Date: Tue Feb 4 13:09:40 2003; Very Interesting! Earlier today I replied to a posting by selecting reply to sender rather than reply to all AND that is what happened. I have a habit of looking at the "TO" box before sending any me; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-02/msg00178.html (8,745 bytes)
11. [TenTec] Sorry for my post (score: 1): Author: dufferjames@hotmail.com (James Duffer); Date: Tue Feb 4 13:27:37 2003; We all have our preferences, and some wish to impose their preferences to the list by requesting a change in the modus operandi. This is a public forum and the deault reply would logically go to the; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-02/msg00181.html (10,511 bytes)
12. [TenTec] Sorry for my post (score: 1): Author: scott@wowpage.com (Scott Johnson); Date: Tue Feb 4 14:48:23 2003; I agree. Tradition with mailing lists, going right back to the '80s, is for the reply-to header to carry the list posting address. If you need to reply to the sender privately, it's trivial to drop t; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-02/msg00192.html (12,036 bytes)
13. [TenTec] Sorry for my post (score: 1): Author: ke4teg@bellsouth.net (KE4TEG); Date: Tue Feb 4 15:15:49 2003; That's not true, Reply goes to the reflector only i.e. tentec@contesting.com . If you want to send to the author only, click on Reply to All and delete whom you do not want it to go to. Of course thi; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-02/msg00195.html (9,222 bytes)
14. [TenTec] Sorry for my post (score: 1): Author: K3YD@aol.com (K3YD@aol.com); Date: Tue Feb 4 17:37:10 2003; << Tradition with mailing lists, going right back to the '80s, is for the reply-to header to carry the list posting address. >> I subscribe to about a dozen mailing lists. Only the ICOM list and now; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-02/msg00224.html (8,141 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 14
Page: [1]