Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+TCXO\s+for\s+OmniVI\+\s*$/: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] TCXO for OmniVI+ (score: 1)
Author: "John L Merrill" <jmerrill1@adelphia.net>
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2005 22:40:48 -0500
I suppose i could ask Ten Tec this but does anyone know when or if they put the TCXO in the OMNIVI+(564)? John N1JM _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesti
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00820.html (6,442 bytes)

2. Re: [TenTec] TCXO for OmniVI+ (score: 1)
Author: Jerry Volpe <kg6tt@tomorrowsweb.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2005 20:28:24 -0800
John L Merrill wrote: I suppose i could ask Ten Tec this but does anyone know when or if they put the TCXO in the OMNIVI+(564)? John N1JM _______________________________________________ TenTec mailin
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00822.html (7,758 bytes)

3. Re: [TenTec] TCXO for OmniVI+ (score: 1)
Author: "Don K5AQ" <donhall@myriad.net>
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2005 22:35:25 -0600
But apparently not in the Option 3, which mine is. 73 Don K5AQ _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/t
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00823.html (7,066 bytes)

4. Re: [TenTec] TCXO for OmniVI+ (score: 1)
Author: <c-hawley@uiuc.edu>
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2005 02:39:46 -0600
I have a factory Omni VI+ (1997) and it has the temp controlled oven oscillator. I think the TCXO is the temp compensated oscillator...so no warmup time. My ovenized osc seems to be fairly stable aft
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00825.html (7,883 bytes)

5. Re: [TenTec] TCXO for OmniVI+ (score: 1)
Author: "Ten-Tec Inc. Amateur Radio Sales" <sales@tentec.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2005 12:12:19 -0500
Approximately the last year of production of the Omni-VI Plus. There is no advantage over it vs. the master heater oven previously used - we made the change because the parts for the oven were no lon
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00836.html (9,076 bytes)

6. Re: [TenTec] TCXO for OmniVI+ (score: 1)
Author: "n4lq" <n4lq@iglou.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2005 12:31:53 -0500
That's interesting because I know of several folks who were led to believe the TCXO was somehow better than the oven. Maybe the adjustment is easier to tweak. I've had 2 option 3's here that both had
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00838.html (9,852 bytes)

7. Re: [TenTec] TCXO for OmniVI+ (score: 1)
Author: Duane A Calvin <ac5aa@juno.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2005 15:32:49 -0600
Not so. My VI+, purchased new in Nov '97 did not have TCXO. It was at least a couple of years later that it was incorporated, if my memory is correct. 73, Duane On Wed, 19 Jan 2005 20:28:24 -0800 Jer
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00848.html (8,577 bytes)

8. Re: [TenTec] TCXO for OmniVI+ (score: 1)
Author: Jim Lowman <jmlowman@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2005 15:02:44 -0800 (PST)
Additionally, maybe the beginning serial number? I bought my VI Plus/564 from a ham in GA; not sure when he originally bought it. Scott? 73 de Jim - AD6CW ____________________________________________
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00850.html (7,774 bytes)

9. Re: [TenTec] TCXO for OmniVI+ (score: 1)
Author: "Duane Budd" <w5ben@arrl.net>
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2005 17:52:21 -0500
"There is no advantage over it vs. the master heater oven previously used..." so says Scott Robbins, and he should know what he is talking about. However, I own one of the first Omni VI's out the doo
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00856.html (8,550 bytes)

10. Re: [TenTec] TCXO for OmniVI+ (score: 1)
Author: Clark Savage Turner <csturner@kcbx.net>
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2005 22:07:50 -0800
On Jan 20, 2005, at 2:52 PM, Duane Budd wrote: "There is no advantage over it vs. the master heater oven previously used..." so says Scott Robbins, and he should know what he is talking about. Howeve
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00859.html (9,057 bytes)

11. Re: [TenTec] TCXO for OmniVI+ (score: 1)
Author: "Ten-Tec Inc. Amateur Radio Sales" <sales@tentec.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2005 15:16:15 -0500
At 03:02 PM 1/20/05 -0800, you wrote: Additionally, maybe the beginning serial number? I bought my VI Plus/564 from a ham in GA; not sure when he originally bought it. Scott? 73 de Jim - AD6CW Ah - s
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00874.html (9,595 bytes)

12. RE: [TenTec] TCXO for OmniVI+ (score: 1)
Author: "NJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2005 09:25:19 -0800
Hallo Horst! Ist hier auch einen Gebrauchtwagenhandel, oder was? ;-)) Sorry guys, I couldn't resist that. 73 Rick Hallo Christian, kannst Du mir mal die Fahrzeugpapiere scannen/senden? Gru&szlig; Hor
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg01095.html (8,472 bytes)

13. Re: [TenTec] TCXO for OmniVI+ (score: 1)
Author: Joe Malloy <jmalloy@stny.rr.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2005 08:20:28 -0500
Liebe Freude, mich deucht, man hat die falsche Gruppe gewaehlt. (Tja, auch ich konnte nicht wiederstehen!) Joe, W2RBA NJ0IP wrote: Hallo Horst! Ist hier auch einen Gebrauchtwagenhandel, oder was? ;-)
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg01096.html (8,959 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu