Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Ten\-Tec\s+Transceiver\s+Survey\s*$/: 72 ]

Total 72 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Ten-Tec Transceiver Survey (score: 1)
Author: "Merle Bone" <merlebone@charter.net>
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 17:56:02 -0500
Ten-Tec is requesting survey input from amateurs on what they think is important in a new transceiver http://radio.tentec.com/Amateur . Click on the survey message at the top of the page. 73, Merle -
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-04/msg00227.html (6,713 bytes)

2. Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec Transceiver Survey (score: 1)
Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net>
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 20:26:48 -1000
It is difficult to tell which line of answer boxes corresponds to which question, because they are so far apart horizontally. If there were more horizontal lines on the survey pages to help the eye f
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-04/msg00231.html (8,163 bytes)

3. Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec Transceiver Survey (score: 1)
Author: "Bill Ames" <billa@aob.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 07:10:28 -0400
I too found it difficult to line up the questions and answers. Also when they ask a question about understanding roofing filters (of which I don't have a clue) and you tell them that then they ask yo
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-04/msg00232.html (9,709 bytes)

4. Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec Transceiver Survey (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Hyder -N4NT-" <mike_n4nt@embarqmail.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 08:17:14 -0400
I found the questions and answers too far apart also. I narrowed the display window and they came together nicely. Mike N4NT _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-04/msg00235.html (10,268 bytes)

5. Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec Transceiver Survey (score: 1)
Author: "W8BVH" <w8bvh@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 10:10:34 -0400
Sounds like someone on the list should make up the questions and send it to Ten Tec then no one will have anything to complain about. Enjoy the sunshine, at least here in Ohio. Ralph Howes W8BVH ____
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-04/msg00236.html (11,553 bytes)

6. Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec Transceiver Survey (score: 1)
Author: "Joel R. Hallas" <jrhallas@optonline.net>
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 10:37:25 -0400
Yes, I wonder if it is particularly significant that one of the most important features to me, a solid second receiver, did not make their list! Regards, Joel Joel R. Hallas, W1ZR Sounds like someone
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-04/msg00237.html (12,339 bytes)

7. Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec Transceiver Survey (score: 1)
Author: Steve Berg <wa9jml@tbc.net>
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 09:43:42 -0500
It is a common methodology in survey research to ask the same question several times in slightly different ways to try to track more closely the views of the persons being surveyed. Obviously, Ten Te
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-04/msg00238.html (8,789 bytes)

8. Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec Transceiver Survey (score: 1)
Author: Ten-Tec Amateur Radio Sales <sales@tentec.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 11:07:56 -0400
There is a fill-in-the blank question on the survey that asks you to tell us: What do you think is the most important item or feature on an HF transceiver? 73 Scott Robbins W4PA _____________________
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-04/msg00241.html (9,173 bytes)

9. Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec Transceiver Survey (score: 1)
Author: "Bill Ames" <billa@aob.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 11:08:15 -0400
I know what it is for me, but I bet it is not that for others, all I want is just one function per knob. I just hate to have to think what the knob (or switch or button) is doing now! :-( But that's
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-04/msg00242.html (10,054 bytes)

10. Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec Transceiver Survey (score: 1)
Author: "Dave W7DPW" <w7dpw@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 08:09:41 -0700
I don't remember that Fill-In-Blank question.. Dave David J Drew -- W7DPW Over 50 Years with Same Call Amateur Extra Since 1970 Continuous ARRL Member Since October 1957 ARRL Life Member October 1969
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-04/msg00243.html (10,217 bytes)

11. Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec Transceiver Survey (score: 1)
Author: starmike@bellsouth.net
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 15:29:39 +0000
I remember seeing it. _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-04/msg00244.html (11,204 bytes)

12. Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec Transceiver Survey (score: 1)
Author: "Gary D Krause" <n7hts@bresnan.net>
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 09:35:50 -0600
I thought the survey was interesting. At least they are asking us what we think even if the info is somewhat limited. To me it shows that Ten Tec may have lost it's way in the amateur community and i
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-04/msg00245.html (11,311 bytes)

13. [TenTec] Ten-Tec Transceiver Survey (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Reynolds" <dave@k6wrf.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 08:46:51 -0700
RECIEVER iF YOU CAN'T HEAR UM YOU CAN'T WORK UM. 73 DAVE K6WRF _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/t
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-04/msg00247.html (9,828 bytes)

14. Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec Transceiver Survey (score: 1)
Author: "Denton" <denton@oregontrail.net>
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 08:57:19 -0700
And I would like to add...low current, bullet proof, high voltage finals. Would require a dual voltage power supply though.... -- Original Message -- From: "Dave Reynolds" <dave@k6wrf.com> To: "Discu
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-04/msg00248.html (11,173 bytes)

15. Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec Transceiver Survey (score: 1)
Author: "Joel R. Hallas" <jrhallas@optonline.net>
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 13:23:25 -0400
Yes, but room for only one "most" important -- not for the other "very" important items <g>! Regards, Joel Joel R. Hallas, W1ZR list! There is a fill-in-the blank question on the survey that asks you
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-04/msg00253.html (9,746 bytes)

16. Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec Transceiver Survey (score: 1)
Author: Ralph Matheny <mathenyr@marietta.edu>
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 14:35:18 -0400 (EDT)
The most significant thing I want from TT in the way of a "new" transceiver is for them to "finish the job" on the last one I bought from them. While my Orion works well, I was "sold" on the concept
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-04/msg00256.html (10,332 bytes)

17. Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec Transceiver Survey (score: 1)
Author: K5XS@aol.com
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 14:37:45 EDT
Ralph, Heaven knows I don't speak for Ten-Tec, but I think that was the basis for their questions on the survey about paying for software. Bernie In a message dated 4/16/2008 1:35:47 P.M. Central Day
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-04/msg00257.html (9,021 bytes)

18. Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec Transceiver Survey (score: 1)
Author: Kc9cdt@aol.com
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 15:06:16 EDT
Paying for firmware updates... NO WAY, unless they are for optional new features. A far as fixing the many remaining bugs/issues I should not have to pay for it twice. HW band scope ... sure I'll pay
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-04/msg00259.html (9,534 bytes)

19. Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec Transceiver Survey (score: 1)
Author: Jerry Volpe <kg6tt@arrl.net>
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 12:27:45 -0700
Pros: Good to see Ten-Tec gathering information for a future product development.... no GREAT! To survive and even flourish Ten-Tec must stay competitive in product offerings. The survey itself had s
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-04/msg00260.html (10,285 bytes)

20. Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec Transceiver Survey (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Berry" <tberry1@triad.rr.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 15:35:40 -0400
I have an Orion and am using V2 of the firmware. I will have to say I really love the radio and enjoy using it very much. I would gladly pay for firmware updates but I don't know how Ten-Tec would do
/archives//html/TenTec/2008-04/msg00261.html (8,751 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu