Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Ten\-Tec\s+mics\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Ten\-Tec\s+mics\s*$/: 15 ]

Total 15 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] ten-tec mics (score: 1): Author: "W5JMW John" <w5jmw@cableone.net>; Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 19:04:51 -0600; Hello to all.I picked up today 2 ten-tec 4 pin hand mics.They are new.1 is still in plastic cover.They are in a ten-tec shipping box.Also is a new speaker,probebly 2.5-3 inch and a bracket.The invoic; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-01/msg00266.html (6,891 bytes)
2. [TenTec] Ten-Tec mics (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2012 13:15:58 -0400 (EDT); Looking at T-T's Web site, I see that they've taken electret condenser mics out of their product lineup. All the mics currently offered are dynamic. Wonder why. 73 Ray W2RS __________________________; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-04/msg00081.html (6,853 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec mics (score: 1): Author: <doug@kb9ryo.com>; Date: Fri, 06 Apr 2012 14:41:21 -0700; that the source dried up. Doug Obenchain, W9NWN Howard Co ARES EC / RACES Kokomo, Indiana w9nwn@arrl.net 765-491-7373 -- Indiana Repeater Council Co-Chairman & Asst. Coordinator ____________________; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-04/msg00086.html (8,146 bytes)
4. Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec mics (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2012 17:44:40 -0400 (EDT); Thanks. Makes sense to me. [73 Ray _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-04/msg00087.html (6,713 bytes)
5. Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec mics (score: 1): Author: "Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>; Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2012 00:23:47 +0200; Guy's, that's nonsense. It may be that one particular OEM quit production, but electret mics are still being built. Also, just because it has a higher output than another type of mic, that doesn't me; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-04/msg00088.html (8,916 bytes)
6. Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec mics (score: 1): Author: <doug@kb9ryo.com>; Date: Fri, 06 Apr 2012 17:17:48 -0700; Not to start a argument but that is what I was told. The source for their mic's went away. Doug Obenchain, W9NWN Howard Co ARES EC / RACES Kokomo, Indiana w9nwn@arrl.net 765-491-7373 -- Indiana Repea; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-04/msg00089.html (10,421 bytes)
7. Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec mics (score: 1): Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>; Date: Fri, 06 Apr 2012 20:57:27 -0400; I am confident you are both correct. It is not that electret condenser microphones have become unobtanium, per se; but the particular OEM product TenTec previously sold was discontinued by its OEM ma; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-04/msg00090.html (8,378 bytes)
8. Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec mics (score: 1): Author: "Paul Kraemer" <elespe@lisco.com>; Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2012 20:36:29 -0500; Electret (condenser) mics are widely used in pro sound applications. They are very small, rugged, have a good pickup, high output, and usually very wide flat response. All desireable qualities. I hav; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-04/msg00091.html (9,535 bytes)
9. Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec mics (score: 1): Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>; Date: Fri, 06 Apr 2012 23:38:08 -0400; Gee... I think I disagree with this proposition. Here is my take: This type of "electret condenser" microphone is not the same type of "condenser microphone" used in professional recording studios. O; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-04/msg00092.html (12,255 bytes)
10. Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec mics (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Fri, 06 Apr 2012 23:52:27 -0700; James, You're both right and wrong. Actually, there are MANY different types of condenser mics, and they are built with outputs in several different formats. Mics for studio, broadcast, and sound rei; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-04/msg00093.html (10,761 bytes)
11. Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec mics (score: 1): Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>; Date: Sat, 07 Apr 2012 03:15:07 -0400; Golly... I do not discern where we disagree on much. I concur in your comments, but fail to see how it really negates my point. It DOES provide a lot more by way of specifics, whereas I was trying to; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-04/msg00094.html (12,741 bytes)
12. Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec mics (score: 1): Author: "Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>; Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2012 09:49:04 +0200; I learned a lot in this thread so far and James and Jim both bring up good points. James said it is difficult to describe something without using too much bandwidth. This very true. I'm challenged wi; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-04/msg00095.html (9,558 bytes)
13. Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec mics (score: 1): Author: wade staggs <tvman1954@gmail.com>; Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2012 03:47:24 -0500; *I am so Sorry but, I just could not help myself. There is only + and Dah ( - ) on an electret condenser. I have thought that Everybody knew that the + equals Dit. Too early in the morning for me. Bu; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-04/msg00096.html (11,001 bytes)
14. Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec mics (score: 1): Author: "Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>; Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2012 11:31:17 +0200; Silly me; what has I thinking of! TNX Wade! *I am so Sorry but, I just could not help myself. There is only + and Dah ( - ) on an electret condenser. I have thought that Everybody knew that the + equ; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-04/msg00097.html (9,045 bytes)
15. Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec mics (score: 1): Author: John <jh.graves@verizon.net>; Date: Sat, 07 Apr 2012 08:56:01 -0400; Golly me. I never knew that old Army ballad was actually about code? Y'awl know it....I don't want to get up in dah morning. Foolish people that we are, insisting on doing our stuff in the evening. J; /archives//html/TenTec/2012-04/msg00099.html (11,906 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 15
Page: [1]