Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Ten\s+Tec\s+Performance\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Ten\s+Tec\s+Performance\s*$/: 18 ]

Total 18 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Ten Tec Performance (score: 1): Author: jcunningham@rockport.k12.ma.us (Jon Cunningham); Date: Tue, 2 May 2000 10:34:20 -0400; I own a 1000mp and just bought a omni 6 plus from ten-tec..of course a mike andpower supply and all filters..over 3000 dollars by the time it arrives....I objectively try to compare the two rigs..fir; /archives//html/TenTec/2000-05/msg00033.html (8,406 bytes)
2. [TenTec] Ten Tec Performance (score: 1): Author: drasmussen@eosintl.com (Don Rasmussen); Date: Tue, 2 May 2000 12:03:28 -0700; Hi Jon and list, I also just bought a new OMNI 6 Plus, actually I am still within my 30 day trial period. I bought the 6+ with the stock SSB filters and purchased an Inrad 400hz CW filter separately.; /archives//html/TenTec/2000-05/msg00036.html (10,979 bytes)
3. [TenTec] Ten Tec Performance (score: 1): Author: w5ben@arrl.net (dbudd); Date: Tue, 2 May 2000 15:41:33 -0400; Yep. That is what Ten-Tec says is "within specs" for the Omni VI. And if you take it to them and they align it perfectly, it will read correctly when you get it back. But then, in a month or two, it; /archives//html/TenTec/2000-05/msg00037.html (9,282 bytes)
4. [TenTec] Ten Tec Performance (score: 1): Author: benk8dit@serv.net (ben); Date: Tue, 2 May 2000 14:27:35 -0700; Not only is that all you get, but you get even less. you've been used to near perfection in radio performance from our offshore suppliers. like our domestic cars, not only are they less efficient in; /archives//html/TenTec/2000-05/msg00039.html (9,443 bytes)
5. [TenTec] Ten Tec Performance (score: 1): Author: ke5c@vvm.com (John, ke5c); Date: Tue, 2 May 2000 18:20:01 -0500; mike I can't compare the omni to the mp, but I've used both the omni and the 1000d in cw contests, and most Yaesu ops think the kd has a better receiver than the mp. On individual specifications, th; /archives//html/TenTec/2000-05/msg00042.html (9,204 bytes)
6. [TenTec] Ten Tec Performance (score: 1): Author: rbdrake@erols.com (Richard B Drake); Date: Wed, 3 May 2000 11:27:21 -0400; Yup! Try using the CW filter on the Yeasu for PSK31 or RTTY which use USB/LSB mode. You'll find you can't do it because Yeasu has added some intelligence to protect you from the silly mistake of usin; /archives//html/TenTec/2000-05/msg00050.html (8,955 bytes)
7. [TenTec] Ten Tec Performance (score: 1): Author: N4LQ@iglou.com (Steve Ellington); Date: Tue, 2 May 2000 21:22:17 -0400; I've had the MP and Omni 6 and think they are both overpriced. The MP has the Las Vegas displays which really bugs your eyes out upon first glance but after listening to cw on it for a few weeks I wa; /archives//html/TenTec/2000-05/msg00053.html (10,784 bytes)
8. [TenTec] Ten Tec Performance (score: 1): Author: K2ZF@aol.com (K2ZF@aol.com); Date: Tue, 2 May 2000 21:27:02 EDT; Hello Ten Tec fans, I have owned a number of high end radios, Yaesu and Icom. There was not one of them that did not have some kind quirk that bothered me. I have been a Ten Tec fan for 13 years and; /archives//html/TenTec/2000-05/msg00054.html (9,561 bytes)
9. [TenTec] Ten Tec Performance (score: 1): Author: K2ZF@aol.com (K2ZF@aol.com); Date: Tue, 2 May 2000 21:31:24 EDT; << c fans, I have owned a number of high end radios, Yaesu and Icom. There was not one of them that did not have some kind quirk that bothered me. I have been a Ten Tec fan for 13 years >> Correction; /archives//html/TenTec/2000-05/msg00055.html (9,298 bytes)
10. Fw: [TenTec] Ten Tec Performance (score: 1): Author: chestert@pressroom.com (Chester Alderman); Date: Tue, 2 May 2000 23:15:27 -0400; was DX Titan it it would I one over speeds or how amateur of of but a matter justify -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm Submissions: tentec@contesting.com Administrative requests:; /archives//html/TenTec/2000-05/msg00061.html (14,443 bytes)
11. [TenTec] Ten Tec Performance (score: 1): Author: bigmack@usa.net (Robert McAdams); Date: Wed, 03 May 2000 11:30:50 -0500; AHMEN! Can we put this one to rest now? -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm Submissions: tentec@contesting.com Administrative requests: tentec-REQUEST@contesting.com Problems: owne; /archives//html/TenTec/2000-05/msg00069.html (10,055 bytes)
12. [TenTec] Ten Tec Performance (score: 1): Author: cherry@neta.com (Jim FitzSimons); Date: Wed, 03 May 2000 09:32:50 -0700; Richard, I was thinking of getting a Yeasu. It is a good thing I go a Ten Tec. I spend most of my time on psk31 or CW. I would have been very unhappy with that. Does Yeasu let you modify the transcei; /archives//html/TenTec/2000-05/msg00070.html (8,958 bytes)
13. [TenTec] Ten Tec Performance (score: 1): Author: aa4nu@ix.netcom.com (Billy Cox); Date: Wed, 3 May 2000 14:37:23 -0500; Which Yaesu model are you speaking of ? The MP allows any combination of filters on any mode ... others may not, the MP does. 73 Billy AA4NU -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm Sub; /archives//html/TenTec/2000-05/msg00073.html (9,735 bytes)
14. [TenTec] Ten Tec Performance (score: 1): Author: N4NT@chartertn.net (Michael O. Hyder); Date: Wed, 3 May 2000 16:05:38 -0400; Is that a triple negative? 73 de Mike N4NT@chartertn.net << c fans, one Ten -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm Submissions: tentec@contesting.com Administrative requests: tentec-R; /archives//html/TenTec/2000-05/msg00074.html (9,664 bytes)
15. [TenTec] Ten Tec Performance (score: 1): Author: CAlderma@ora.fda.gov (Alderman, Chester); Date: Wed, 3 May 2000 13:04:18 -0400; Sorry but I disagree with you on this..! I think this reflector is a GOOD place to compare Ten Tec rigs to all other brands of radios. Tom/W4BQF AHMEN! Can we put this one to rest now? Ten a not of -; /archives//html/TenTec/2000-05/msg00077.html (10,280 bytes)
16. [TenTec] Ten Tec Performance (score: 1): Author: K2ZF@aol.com (K2ZF@aol.com); Date: Wed, 3 May 2000 20:04:42 EDT; << I found the Omni 6 to be much easier on my ears for extended cw reception and some of the faults you mentioned can be eliminated such as the clicking qsk by simply unplugging one cable. Hey Steve,; /archives//html/TenTec/2000-05/msg00084.html (8,316 bytes)
17. [TenTec] Ten Tec Performance (score: 1): Author: N4LQ@iglou.com (Steve Ellington); Date: Wed, 3 May 2000 21:39:46 -0400; Hey. If it did not have a quirk that DID NOT bother you, that means that it DID have a quirk that did not bother you which cancels and renders the whole concept void. Uh...How about this: Every radio; /archives//html/TenTec/2000-05/msg00086.html (9,864 bytes)
18. [TenTec] Ten Tec Performance (score: 1): Author: N4LQ@iglou.com (Steve Ellington); Date: Wed, 3 May 2000 22:02:14 -0400; I'm sure this is described on the unofficial tentec site located at www.qsl.net/tentec but their server is down for repairs at the moment. It is widely know to cure the mushy or clicky sound in your; /archives//html/TenTec/2000-05/msg00087.html (8,952 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 18
Page: [1]