Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+The\s+QSK\s+of\s+QSK\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+The\s+QSK\s+of\s+QSK\s*$/: 26 ]

Total 26 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] The QSK of QSK (score: 1): Author: jsb@digistar.com; Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 09:49:47 -0400 (EDT); It's probably safe to say that the majority of CW ops using radios with good filtering systems to reduce background noise and proper sidetone adjustment prefer QSK - running QSK without getting the s; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00689.html (9,193 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] The QSK of QSK (score: 1): Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 09:09:31 -0500; I own six radios that do very acceptable QSK. They are a K2/100, Omni A, Omni V, TS-850, FT100D, and IC-746. To say that Ten Tec radios are the only radios that do acceptable QSK (or even good QSK) i; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00690.html (9,788 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] The QSK of QSK (score: 1): Author: "Dave Edwards" <kd2e@comcast.net>; Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 10:24:34 -0400; Jim... You're biased!! Look at your rig list... Two Ten Tec amps, Two Ten Tec rigs..and a K2 QSK Heaven!! I just picked up an FT897D rig last week at HRO. I gave it a try in QSK mode... Ain't gonna h; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00694.html (10,746 bytes)
4. Re: [TenTec] The QSK of QSK (score: 1): Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 11:24:54 -0500; Biased? If it's a bias, it's a bias based on experience. Since QSK is a MUST for me, I won't buy a rig that doesn't do acceptable QSK. But more to the point. When I started doing ham radio (in 1955),; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00704.html (11,116 bytes)
5. Re: [TenTec] The QSK of QSK (score: 1): Author: "Dave Edwards" <kd2e@comcast.net>; Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 12:33:09 -0400; But someone is a 'LID' if they are dxing without QSK?? were those the radio fail)? a much noise FT100D full aren't _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contestin; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00705.html (11,744 bytes)
6. Re: [TenTec] The QSK of QSK (score: 1): Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>; Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 15:59:49 -0400; YES!! Because they do just like he says. They can not tell they are transmitting (calling) while the DX is answering someone else, etc., etc., etc. Tom - W4BQF antenna, In of that had all ___________; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00716.html (13,348 bytes)
7. Re: [TenTec] The QSK of QSK (score: 1): Author: Kc9cdt@aol.com; Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 16:40:53 EDT; Come on guys, you mean I should be able to hear a station calling someone else in between dits, AND know it's the DX not another station trying for him just like me? 73, Lee _________________________; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00717.html (6,936 bytes)
8. Re: [TenTec] The QSK of QSK (score: 1): Author: "Bill Rowlett" <kc4atu@hotmail.com>; Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 20:49:45 +0000; No, the problem is not that they do not use VOX, it is that in the pileup they call more than once. If everybody did as they are suppose to do, which is to give their cpmplete call once, DXi'ing woul; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00718.html (12,214 bytes)
9. Re: [TenTec] The QSK of QSK (score: 1): Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>; Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 10:56:09 -1000; Come on guys, you mean I should be able to hear a station calling someone else in between dits, AND know it's the DX not another station trying for him just like me? At least you should be able to te; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00720.html (7,339 bytes)
10. Re: [TenTec] The QSK of QSK (score: 1): Author: "Bob Henderson" <bob@cytanet.com.cy>; Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 20:59:00 -0000; That's right Lee. It's not as far fetched as it sounds, when you consider that most DX-peditions work split frequency. Bob, 5B4AGN him _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing l; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00721.html (8,004 bytes)
11. Re: [TenTec] The QSK of QSK (score: 1): Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 16:09:07 -0500; With skill, and with the best QSK radios, ABSOLUTELY! Especially when the DX is working split! And remember, good operating is about SKILL, COURTESY, and GOOD JUDGEMENT. There are differences between; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00723.html (9,081 bytes)
12. [TenTec] The QSK of QSK (score: 1): Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 21:22:31 -0400; dits, AND know it's the DX not another station trying for him just like me? You don't need to "hear between the dits" to do this. I've used foot switches exclusively for both CW and SSB many years i; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00733.html (8,501 bytes)
13. Re: [TenTec] The QSK of QSK (score: 1): Author: "Michael Tope" <W4EF@dellroy.com>; Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 21:02:20 -0700; Only 312 countries on 160 and doesn't use QSK. Your obviously a lid, Bill :) 73 de Mike, W4EF................................. -- -- _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing lis; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00743.html (8,505 bytes)
14. Re: [TenTec] The QSK of QSK (score: 1): Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2004 00:06:59 -0500; Anyone can work lots of DX (and score big in contests with big power and big antennas. This is NOT a measure of operating skill. It takes skill to do it with low power and mediocre antennas. On the o; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00745.html (9,272 bytes)
15. Re: [TenTec] The QSK of QSK (score: 1): Author: "Michael Tope" <W4EF@dellroy.com>; Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2004 00:21:39 -0700; Hi Jim, Some would argue that it takes a masochistic streak to do it with low power and mediocre antennas. I mean, if I turn down my power and antenna gain so the guy on the other end can't hear me,; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00748.html (11,040 bytes)
16. [TenTec] The QSK of QSK (score: 1): Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2004 07:32:24 -0400; On the other hand, Bill notes that while he does not use a mode on his radios called full QSK, he DOES listen often using his foot switch. That's correct. I first used QSK with the E.F. Johnson T-R S; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00754.html (10,841 bytes)
17. Re: [TenTec] The QSK of QSK (score: 1): Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2004 07:23:27 -0500; I would say the opposite. Most current award and contest structures reward those who buy more of the most expensive gear and assemble the biggest stations. They cater to the the rich, not to ordinary; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00755.html (10,642 bytes)
18. [TenTec] The QSK of QSK (score: 1): Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2004 08:26:23 -0400; PIN-diode amp might be OK, but most current QSK amps (mine included) use vacuum relays. I simply don't like the idea of those relays using up their finite number of lifetime cycles every time I send; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00756.html (8,972 bytes)
19. Re: [TenTec] The QSK of QSK (score: 1): Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2004 09:12:50 -0500; [K9YC notes that W4BQF works very high speed CW, so he puts that relay through a LOT of cycles annually.] To which Bill Tippett replied: Hmmm right back. I have to use a muffler on my car, to protect; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00762.html (9,747 bytes)
20. Re: [TenTec] The QSK of QSK (score: 1): Author: Dave Heil <k8mn@earthlink.net>; Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2004 15:13:55 +0000; With respect, Jim, I find that a false premise. Not everyone can work lots of DX or score big in a contest with QRO and large antennas. A poor operator with high power and large antennas is still a p; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00766.html (9,603 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]