- 1. [TenTec] The new TT low end..... (score: 1)
- Author: bames@mecasw.com (bames@mecasw.com)
- Date: Mon, 23 Jun 1997 13:58:31 -0400
- What needs to be done here on this echo, and not by TT, is for us define the features we want. Sort of build a paper prototype. Every one gets to contribute their ideas. After all features are identi
- /archives//html/TenTec/1997-06/msg00180.html (8,398 bytes)
- 2. [TenTec] The new TT low end..... (score: 1)
- Author: larryd@bright.net (Larry DiGioia)
- Date: Mon, 23 Jun 1997 19:35:34 -0400
- That would not be very useful. The people here on this list are not exactly representative of the potential buyers of Ten-Tec equipment. Most have already bought. In order to reach a representative m
- /archives//html/TenTec/1997-06/msg00189.html (8,693 bytes)
- 3. [TenTec] The new TT low end..... (score: 1)
- Author: bames@mecasw.com (bames@mecasw.com)
- Date: Tue, 24 Jun 1997 08:31:55 -0400
- RE: TEN-TEC ites 10,000, 10,000. Rest my case. 73's Dennis K6RCL Well, if I owned some TT stock (are they public?) I probably could afford a high end rig and could let someone else fight for the litt
- /archives//html/TenTec/1997-06/msg00200.html (7,805 bytes)
- 4. [TenTec] The new TT low end..... (score: 1)
- Author: ai7b@teleport.com (Bob Wruble)
- Date: Tue, 24 Jun 1997 07:15:54 -0700
- spoken like a true liberal !! w7gg -- To: <tentec@contesting.com> -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm Submissions: tentec@contesting.com Administrative requests: tentec-REQUEST@con
- /archives//html/TenTec/1997-06/msg00204.html (8,784 bytes)
- 5. [TenTec] The new TT low end..... (score: 1)
- Author: cooper@gmpvt.com (Tom Cooper)
- Date: Tue, 24 Jun 1997 11:07:37 -0400
- "subscription" product, like the Titan Gold, since there is virtually no risk involved, provided the size of the pre-paid sales lot is large enough. in one box, frequency control (PTO, DDS, VCO, any
- /archives//html/TenTec/1997-06/msg00205.html (8,567 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu