Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+cone\s+Antenna\s+PHOTO\s+of\s+how\s+to\s+wind\s+them\s+which\s+band\?\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] cone Antenna PHOTO of how to wind them which band? (score: 1)
Author: rohre@arlut.utexas.edu (Stuart Rohre)
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2002 00:33:55 -0500
Al, It is somewhat unconventional to all of us used to single wire antennas. That is why it works better than the Isotron, the EH, or the other small antenna ideas that do not contain full resonant l
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00512.html (9,531 bytes)

2. [TenTec] cone Antenna PHOTO of how to wind them which band? (score: 1)
Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch)
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2002 08:36:13 -0400
Antennas radiation is directly tied to ampere-feet of linear distance, nothing else. EM radiation occurs because of charge acceleration, nothing else. 200 feet of wire in a ten-foot physical length
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00513.html (9,962 bytes)

3. [TenTec] cone Antenna PHOTO of how to wind them which band? (score: 1)
Author: rohre@arlut.utexas.edu (Stuart Rohre)
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2002 13:52:02 -0500
Well, I do not disagree that capture area is all important to great antennas. But for the condo owner with antenna restrictions, he is never going to see the antenna farms that Tom and I love to buil
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00530.html (8,959 bytes)

4. [TenTec] cone Antenna PHOTO of how to wind them which band? (score: 1)
Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch)
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2002 08:04:41 -0400
Hi Stuart, Capture area or effective aperture is not directly related to physical size, even though that is a popular misconception used to tout physically large antennas. Capture area relates direct
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00546.html (9,918 bytes)

5. [TenTec] cone Antenna PHOTO of how to wind them which band? (score: 1)
Author: rohre@arlut.utexas.edu (Stuart Rohre)
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2002 16:31:39 -0500
Hi Tom, I NEVER claimed the folded conical Helix was better than all other antennas, I said it was more efficient than some small antennas of comparable volume which it is. The Isotron and most other
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00553.html (9,633 bytes)

6. [TenTec] cone Antenna PHOTO of how to wind them which band? (score: 1)
Author: k4wj@bellsouth.net (John/K4WJ)
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2002 21:27:08 -0400
Stuart, What is a Wheeler Cap Efficiency Measurement? Is this covered in the ARRL Handbook or Antenna Book? 73..de John/K4WJ 73..de John/K4WJ ** John/K4WJ in Pembroke Pines, FL QTH 26 00 51 N 80 16 1
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00555.html (8,907 bytes)

7. [TenTec] cone Antenna PHOTO of how to wind them which band? (score: 1)
Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch)
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2002 11:04:20 -0400
Hi Stuart, First you said the cone antenna was 90% efficient and the MFJ loop was 10% efficient on ten meters. Now you say "**some loops** are 10% efficient". Of course that is correct, because some
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00562.html (8,953 bytes)

8. [TenTec] cone Antenna PHOTO of how to wind them which band? (score: 1)
Author: bohnovic@bellsouth.net (John Bohnovic)
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2002 20:59:57 -0400
Stuart, What is a Wheeler Cap Efficiency Measurement? Is this covered in the ARRL Handbook or Antenna Book? 73..de John/K4WJ John and Susan Bohnovic (954) 432-1467 voice (954) 431-7751 fax/data bohno
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00572.html (10,593 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu