Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+great\s+RX320\s+review\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+great\s+RX320\s+review\s*$/: 16 ]

Total 16 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] great RX320 review (score: 1): Author: n9vv@wideopenwest.com (Ken Hopper N9VV); Date: Mon Jun 9 14:36:24 2003; This RX320 review includes some great software info http://arstechnica.com/guide/audio-visual/shortwave/shortwave-1.html kch; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-06/msg00333.html (7,398 bytes)
2. [TenTec] great RX320 review (score: 1): Author: wlfuqu00@uky.edu (Bill Fuqua); Date: Mon Jun 9 14:53:55 2003; I wonder if Ten Tec could produce a RX320 with IF output only to send to sound card and not have the DSP stuff and audio for much less than the RX320. PC DSP IF is practical now up to 15 or 20 KHz. 7; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-06/msg00334.html (8,132 bytes)
3. [TenTec] great RX320 review (score: 1): Author: n9dg@yahoo.com (Duane Grotophorst); Date: Mon Jun 9 17:22:25 2003; That is exactly what the RX-320D is. http://www.tentec.com/TT320.htm It outputs the 12KHz IF signal on a newly provided jack on the back panel. Its main limitation is that it will only provide for 2.; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-06/msg00338.html (8,375 bytes)
4. [TenTec] great RX320 review (score: 1): Author: wlfuqu00@UKY.EDU (Bill Fuqua); Date: Tue Jun 10 10:46:23 2003; I thought the D was a regular RX320 with an IF out added. Still had the DSP stuff inside. 73 Bill wa4lav; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-06/msg00358.html (9,222 bytes)
5. [TenTec] great RX320 review (score: 1): Author: n9dg@yahoo.com (Duane Grotophorst); Date: Tue Jun 10 12:29:04 2003; Yes it does still have all the DSP stuff of its own, but the 12KHZ signal that is provided on the back panel is before any of the A to D and DSP of the RX-320 itself. However the DSP in the RX 320 wi; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-06/msg00360.html (9,840 bytes)
6. [TenTec] great RX320 review (score: 1): Author: wlfuqu00@uky.edu (Bill Fuqua); Date: Tue Jun 10 16:26:52 2003; Sound cards today will provide a dynamic range of over 120 db anyway. Looking at the schematic, there are 2 PIN diodes for gain control. One just after the Input lowpass filter and one on the output; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-06/msg00364.html (11,258 bytes)
7. [TenTec] great RX320 review (score: 1): Author: ghoffman@spacetech.com (Gary Hoffman); Date: Tue Jun 10 17:18:00 2003; I bet they could. I would love to buy one !!! 73 de Gary, AA2IZ; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-06/msg00365.html (9,421 bytes)
8. [TenTec] great RX320 review (score: 1): Author: wlfuqu00@uky.edu (Bill Fuqua); Date: Tue Jun 10 18:44:22 2003; I think they could make a relatively simple kit with the local oscillators, mixers, IF and filters (45MHz and 455KHz). Take out the extras like AGC ( use attenuators), and the HI-Z input. This would; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-06/msg00369.html (11,108 bytes)
9. [TenTec] great RX320 review (score: 1): Author: tongaloa@alltel.net (tongaloa); Date: Tue Jun 10 19:07:38 2003; We could make a kit. The RX320 is a rather elegant design and would be a great RX with tracking RF filter, IQ final mix and output for a 96khz 24bit soundcard... If you think we could sell 1000 of th; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-06/msg00371.html (8,404 bytes)
10. [TenTec] great RX320 review (score: 1): Author: sswhite@mchsi.com (Steve); Date: Tue Jun 10 21:07:15 2003; I have always wanted a small QRP module that would go inside my RX-320 case I would think that since the 320 is smiliar to the Pegasus that this would be relatively easy to do. I would guess that you; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-06/msg00376.html (9,554 bytes)
11. [TenTec] great RX320 review (score: 1): Author: wa2pvk@msn.com (WILLIAM MANSEY); Date: Tue Jun 10 21:28:21 2003; Why not save yourself a lot of time and effort by purchasing an Argonaut V? Combine that with Carl's, or similar control, software and your laptop computer and you are good to go. The Argonaut has a; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-06/msg00378.html (8,823 bytes)
12. [TenTec] great RX320 review (score: 1): Author: sswhite@mchsi.com (Steve); Date: Tue Jun 10 22:55:35 2003; I would be that your right that the Argo has a better receiver and it is already to go just add Carl's software and an antenna. I am afraid that sometimes I like to do things the harder way to learn; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-06/msg00380.html (9,625 bytes)
13. [TenTec] great RX320 review (score: 1): Author: wlfuqu00@uky.edu (Bill L. Fuqua); Date: Wed Jun 11 00:57:53 2003; I do not need an an Argonaut V. I was was interested in a very basic (primitive)low cost receiver that would take advantage of the existing processing capability that most people have. Something bett; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-06/msg00381.html (9,234 bytes)
14. [TenTec] great RX320 review (score: 1): Author: malcolm.mcleman@free.fr (Malcolm McLeman); Date: Wed Jun 11 02:31:36 2003; Hi Bill, Your pupil's difficulty with oscillators, have you never tried them with the Franklin? I built one in the early '60's using a 12AT7 double triode minimum external components, using a high qu; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-06/msg00383.html (10,521 bytes)
15. [TenTec] great RX320 review (score: 1): Author: wlfuqu00@uky.edu (Bill Fuqua); Date: Wed Jun 11 10:13:09 2003; " Your pupil's difficulty with oscillators, have you never tried them with the Franklin? I built one in the early '60's using a 12AT7 double triode minimum external components, using a high quality c; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-06/msg00388.html (12,659 bytes)
16. [TenTec] great RX320 review (score: 1): Author: wb2vuf@qsl.net (Bwana Bob); Date: Wed Jun 11 20:06:40 2003; Well, could we just use the T-T 1254 receiver and tap off the 45 MHz or 455 kHz I.F.? Bob WB2VUF; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-06/msg00405.html (11,547 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 16
Page: [1]