Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+mike\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+mike\s*$/: 28 ]

Total 28 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] mike (score: 1): Author: "ROD" <w3krq@dejazzd.com>; Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2011 13:19:12 -0500; For sale a heil ten tec studio one mike in great shape and works ok. I am getting a heil pr40 I will sell the ten tec studio one for 60.00 shipped comes with a ten tec yeasu cable with 8 pin connecto; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-02/msg00235.html (7,014 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] mike (score: 1): Author: "Philip C. Anderson" <xtraham58@hotmail.com>; Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2011 13:35:09 -0500; Is that the same as the TT model 709 mic ???? Andy IMPORTANT: If you forward this e-mail, please highlight and delete the forwarding history, which includes my e-mail address.. It is a courtesy to me; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-02/msg00236.html (7,589 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] mike (score: 1): Author: "ROD" <w3krq@dejazzd.com>; Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2011 13:59:58 -0500; no this mike has a push to talk button . T his mike was built by heil for ten tec when the orion1 came out it sole new for 129.95 Is that the same as the TT model 709 mic ???? Andy IMPORTANT: If you; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-02/msg00237.html (8,684 bytes)
4. Re: [TenTec] mike (score: 1): Author: "ROD" <w3krq@dejazzd.com>; Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2011 14:05:41 -0500; check on eham look type on google heil ten tec studio one mike. Is that the same as the TT model 709 mic ???? Andy IMPORTANT: If you forward this e-mail, please highlight and delete the forwarding hi; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-02/msg00238.html (8,211 bytes)
5. [TenTec] mike (score: 1): Author: "Rodney" <w3krq@dejazzd.com>; Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2013 18:19:56 -0400; Does the 539 Argonaut come with a mike like the eagle I am interested. _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/li; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-10/msg00368.html (6,949 bytes)
6. Re: [TenTec] mike (score: 1): Author: "Bob McGraw - K4TAX" <RMcGraw@Blomand.net>; Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2013 17:31:21 -0500; The Argonaut VI manual does not list a mike included in the Accessory package. The Eagle does list a 702 hand mike listed in the Accessory package. I use the model 702 mike with the Eagle in the mobi; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-10/msg00369.html (8,146 bytes)
7. Re: [TenTec] mike (score: 1): Author: "Rodney" <w3krq@dejazzd.com>; Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2013 18:34:32 -0400; not interested if no mike The Argonaut VI manual does not list a mike included in the Accessory package. The Eagle does list a 702 hand mike listed in the Accessory package. I use the model 702 mike; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-10/msg00370.html (8,236 bytes)
8. Re: [TenTec] mike (score: 1): Author: "Bob McGraw - K4TAX" <RMcGraw@Blomand.net>; Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2013 21:03:14 -0500; Then purchase the Eagle and you'll get a mike. 73 Bob, K4TAX not interested if no mike The Argonaut VI manual does not list a mike included in the Accessory package. The Eagle does list a 702 hand mi; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-10/msg00376.html (9,729 bytes)
9. Re: [TenTec] mike (score: 1): Author: José Félix Ballester <jfballester@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2013 22:21:08 -0400; The TenTec Eagle is a superior radio. I have one, and the latest firmware update have turned it into a superb transceiver. Maybe short on some bells and whistles but long on performance in on what re; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-10/msg00378.html (10,189 bytes)
10. Re: [TenTec] mike (score: 1): Author: "Robert Mcgraw" <rmcgraw@blomand.net>; Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2013 07:14:08 -0500 (CDT); I've been using my Eagle in the truck for the past 3 months. Performs as good on receive as the radio at the house. Super receiver with the optional Noise Blanker. With the optional ATU for a 100 wat; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-10/msg00380.html (11,802 bytes)
11. Re: [TenTec] mike (score: 1): Author: Richards <jrichards@k8jhr.com>; Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2013 17:55:12 -0400; Gee, Rodney... it comes with a microphone if you order one. I am sure good ol' Stan can find one to sell with the rig. Otherwise, I have a very nice, very lightly used Model 708 microphone for sale f; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-10/msg00388.html (8,084 bytes)
12. [TenTec] mike (score: 1): Author: "Rodney" <w3krq@dejazzd.com>; Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2014 18:50:31 -0400; I made my 707 sound great. _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-04/msg00365.html (6,286 bytes)
13. Re: [TenTec] mike (score: 1): Author: "Bob McGraw - K4TAX" <RMcGraw@Blomand.net>; Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2014 18:48:38 -0500; So what did you do? And what radio are you using? 73 Bob, K4TAX I made my 707 sound great. _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.conte; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-04/msg00366.html (7,739 bytes)
14. Re: [TenTec] mike (score: 1): Author: "Rodney" <w3krq@dejazzd.com>; Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2014 19:55:46 -0400; Radio ORION11 I had tested my 709 and 707 with ham's that know me and 6 ham's that don't know me did a ab test 709 was better every time so I like the looks of the 707 so I traded the mike elements t; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-04/msg00367.html (8,196 bytes)
15. Re: [TenTec] mike (score: 1): Author: "Bob McGraw - K4TAX" <RMcGraw@Blomand.net>; Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2014 19:15:44 -0500; Interesting approach. Thanks. 73 Bob, K4TAX Radio ORION11 I had tested my 709 and 707 with ham's that know me and 6 ham's that don't know me did a ab test 709 was better every time so I like the look; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-04/msg00368.html (9,060 bytes)
16. Re: [TenTec] mike (score: 1): Author: K3GHH <k3ghh@arrl.net>; Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2014 21:14:24 -0400; 707 --> 709... I never see 708's mentioned, and that's what I have. What's the list's view of that mike? I'm a CW guy. Hope this isn't too far from the thread topic; Rodney's mention of these two ski; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-04/msg00369.html (10,124 bytes)
17. Re: [TenTec] mike (score: 1): Author: "Rodney" <w3krq@dejazzd.com>; Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2014 21:17:59 -0400; 708 and 709 have the same element. 707 --> 709... I never see 708's mentioned, and that's what I have. What's the list's view of that mike? I'm a CW guy. Hope this isn't too far from the thread topic; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-04/msg00370.html (10,380 bytes)
18. Re: [TenTec] mike (score: 1): Author: "Merschrod" <kris@merschrod.net>; Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2014 17:47:43 +0500 (GMT-5); Is the 707 element different, and how, from the 708/709? Could the difference be in the form or material of the mouthpiece? 73 Kris KM2KM _______________________________________________ TenTec mailin; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-04/msg00373.html (11,979 bytes)
19. Re: [TenTec] mike (score: 1): Author: Doug Reid <n1068d@aol.com>; Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2014 09:18:36 -0400 (EDT); Rodney, I read your posts but I am not really sure what you accomplished in your microphone test. Were you trying to find the mic that sounded the most like your natural voice, or were you going for; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-04/msg00376.html (8,750 bytes)
20. Re: [TenTec] mike (score: 1): Author: "Rodney" <w3krq@dejazzd.com>; Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2014 10:10:33 -0400; Natural voice and intelligibility Rodney, I read your posts but I am not really sure what you accomplished in your microphone test. Were you trying to find the mic that sounded the most like your nat; /archives//html/TenTec/2014-04/msg00380.html (9,522 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]