TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] mike

To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] mike
From: "Merschrod" <kris@merschrod.net>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2014 17:47:43 +0500 (GMT-5)
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Is the 707 element different, and how, from the 708/709?

Could the difference be in the form or material of the mouthpiece?

73 Kris KM2KM


> 708 and 709 have the same element.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: K3GHH
> Sent: Saturday, April 19, 2014 9:14 PM
> To: tentec@contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [TenTec] mike
>
> 707 --> 709... I never see 708's mentioned, and that's what I have.
> What's the list's view of that mike? I'm a CW guy. Hope this isn't too
> far from the thread topic; Rodney's mention of these two
> skipping-over-708 mikes provoked the question.
>
>
> On 04/19/2014 08:15 PM, Bob McGraw - K4TAX wrote:
>> Interesting approach.  Thanks.
>>
>> 73
>> Bob, K4TAX
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Rodney" <w3krq@dejazzd.com>
>> To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
>> Sent: Saturday, April 19, 2014 6:55 PM
>> Subject: Re: [TenTec] mike
>>
>>
>>> Radio ORION11    I had  tested my 709 and 707 with  ham's  that know
>>> me and 6 ham's that don't know me did a ab test 709 was better every
>>> time so I like the looks of the 707 so I traded the mike elements the
>>> 707 now has the 709 and the 709 now has the 707 element.
>>>
>>> -----Original Message----- From: Bob McGraw - K4TAX
>>> Sent: Saturday, April 19, 2014 7:48 PM
>>> To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment
>>> Subject: Re: [TenTec] mike
>>>
>>> So what did you do?  And what radio are you using?
>>>
>>> 73
>>> Bob, K4TAX
>>>
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Rodney" <w3krq@dejazzd.com>
>>> To: <tentec@contesting.com>
>>> Sent: Saturday, April 19, 2014 5:50 PM
>>> Subject: [TenTec] mike
>>>
>>>
>>>> I made my 707 sound great.
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> TenTec mailing list
>>>> TenTec@contesting.com
>>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> TenTec mailing list
>>> TenTec@contesting.com
>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> TenTec mailing list
>>> TenTec@contesting.com
>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> TenTec mailing list
>> TenTec@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>>
>
> --
> -- John K3GHH
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>