Re: [TenTec] mike

["Bob McGraw - K4TAX" <RMcGraw@Blomand.net>]

I use the 707 with the Omni VII and always get "great audio" reports.

Typical values:
SSB TX BW    3000
TX Roll Off      250
TX EQ             0 dB
Speech Processor    40%
MIC GAIN             55% *
*Value dependant on Hardware Mike gain.


73
Bob, K4TAX


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Rodney" <w3krq@dejazzd.com>
To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Sunday, April 20, 2014 6:27 PM
Subject: Re: [TenTec] mike


> hear my 707 on 1997 at 800 pm
>
> -----Original Message----- 
> From: Rodney Sent: Sunday, April 20, 2014 5:33 PM To: Discussion of 
> Ten-Tec Equipment Subject: Re: [TenTec] mike
> 708 has more lowin more bass
>
> -----Original Message----- 
> From: Doug Reid
> Sent: Sunday, April 20, 2014 4:59 PM
> To: tentec@contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [TenTec] mike
>
>
> I agree with Bob's remarks.  The two microphones use the same element, but 
> achieve different results.
> Doug  WD4LNW
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bob McGraw - K4TAX <RMcGraw@Blomand.net>
> To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
> Sent: Sun, Apr 20, 2014 4:45 pm
> Subject: Re: [TenTec] mike
>
>
> The configuration and not the element, i.e., mounting, vents, back loading
> nd such largely impact the response and more importantly the polar
> esponse.
> For that reason I prefer the 709 in place of the 708.  One is
> mnidirectional and one is unidirectional.
> 73
> ob, K4TAX
>
>
> ---- Original Message ----- 
> rom: "Rodney" <w3krq@dejazzd.com>
> o: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
> ent: Saturday, April 19, 2014 8:17 PM
> ubject: Re: [TenTec] mike
>
> 708 and 709 have the same element.
>
> -----Original Message----- 
> From: K3GHH Sent: Saturday, April 19, 2014 9:14 PM To:
> tentec@contesting.com Subject: Re: [TenTec] mike
> 707 --> 709... I never see 708's mentioned, and that's what I have. What's
> the list's view of that mike? I'm a CW guy. Hope this isn't too far from
> the thread topic; Rodney's mention of these two skipping-over-708 mikes
> provoked the question.
>
>
> On 04/19/2014 08:15 PM, Bob McGraw - K4TAX wrote:
> > Interesting approach.  Thanks.
> >
> > 73
> > Bob, K4TAX
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Rodney" <w3krq@dejazzd.com>
> > To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
> > Sent: Saturday, April 19, 2014 6:55 PM
> > Subject: Re: [TenTec] mike
> >
> >
> > > Radio ORION11    I had  tested my 709 and 707 with  ham's  that know me
> > > and 6 ham's that don't know me did a ab test 709 was better every time
> > > so I like the looks of the 707 so I traded the mike elements the 707 now
> > > has the 709 and the 709 now has the 707 element.
> > >
> > > -----Original Message----- From: Bob McGraw - K4TAX
> > > Sent: Saturday, April 19, 2014 7:48 PM
> > > To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment
> > > Subject: Re: [TenTec] mike
> > >
> > > So what did you do?  And what radio are you using?
> > >
> > > 73
> > > Bob, K4TAX
> > >
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Rodney" <w3krq@dejazzd.com>
> > > To: <tentec@contesting.com>
> > > Sent: Saturday, April 19, 2014 5:50 PM
> > > Subject: [TenTec] mike
> > >
> > >
> > > > I made my 707 sound great.
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > TenTec mailing list
> > > > TenTec@contesting.com
> > > > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > TenTec mailing list
> > > TenTec@contesting.com
> > > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > TenTec mailing list
> > > TenTec@contesting.com
> > > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > TenTec mailing list
> > TenTec@contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
> --
> -- John K3GHH
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>
>
> ______________________________________________
> enTec mailing list
> enTec@contesting.com
> ttp://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec