TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] mike

To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] mike
From: "Bob McGraw - K4TAX" <RMcGraw@Blomand.net>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2014 20:31:48 -0500
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
I have 2 of the 709's. They too get "great audio" reports...... but with different radio settings than used with the 707 on the Omni VII. Typically I have one 709 on the Argonaut VI and the other 709 on the Eagle when it's not being used mobile or in the travel trailer.

73
Bob, K4TAX


----- Original Message ----- From: "Rodney" <w3krq@dejazzd.com>
To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Sunday, April 20, 2014 8:10 PM
Subject: Re: [TenTec] mike


Try a 709

-----Original Message----- From: Bob McGraw - K4TAX
Sent: Sunday, April 20, 2014 7:39 PM
To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment
Subject: Re: [TenTec] mike

I use the 707 with the Omni VII and always get "great audio" reports.

Typical values:
SSB TX BW    3000
TX Roll Off      250
TX EQ             0 dB
Speech Processor    40%
MIC GAIN             55% *
*Value dependant on Hardware Mike gain.


73
Bob, K4TAX


----- Original Message ----- From: "Rodney" <w3krq@dejazzd.com>
To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Sunday, April 20, 2014 6:27 PM
Subject: Re: [TenTec] mike


hear my 707 on 1997 at 800 pm

-----Original Message----- From: Rodney Sent: Sunday, April 20, 2014 5:33 PM To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment Subject: Re: [TenTec] mike
708 has more lowin more bass

-----Original Message----- From: Doug Reid
Sent: Sunday, April 20, 2014 4:59 PM
To: tentec@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TenTec] mike


I agree with Bob's remarks. The two microphones use the same element, but achieve different results.

Doug  WD4LNW



-----Original Message-----
From: Bob McGraw - K4TAX <RMcGraw@Blomand.net>
To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Sun, Apr 20, 2014 4:45 pm
Subject: Re: [TenTec] mike


The configuration and not the element, i.e., mounting, vents, back loading
nd such largely impact the response and more importantly the polar
esponse.
For that reason I prefer the 709 in place of the 708.  One is
mnidirectional and one is unidirectional.
73
ob, K4TAX


---- Original Message ----- rom: "Rodney" <w3krq@dejazzd.com>
o: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
ent: Saturday, April 19, 2014 8:17 PM
ubject: Re: [TenTec] mike

708 and 709 have the same element.

-----Original Message----- From: K3GHH Sent: Saturday, April 19, 2014 9:14 PM To:
tentec@contesting.com Subject: Re: [TenTec] mike
707 --> 709... I never see 708's mentioned, and that's what I have. What's
the list's view of that mike? I'm a CW guy. Hope this isn't too far from
the thread topic; Rodney's mention of these two skipping-over-708 mikes
provoked the question.


On 04/19/2014 08:15 PM, Bob McGraw - K4TAX wrote:
Interesting approach.  Thanks.

73
Bob, K4TAX


----- Original Message ----- From: "Rodney" <w3krq@dejazzd.com>
To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Saturday, April 19, 2014 6:55 PM
Subject: Re: [TenTec] mike


Radio ORION11    I had  tested my 709 and 707 with  ham's  that know me
and 6 ham's that don't know me did a ab test 709 was better every time
so I like the looks of the 707 so I traded the mike elements the 707 now
has the 709 and the 709 now has the 707 element.

-----Original Message----- From: Bob McGraw - K4TAX
Sent: Saturday, April 19, 2014 7:48 PM
To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment
Subject: Re: [TenTec] mike

So what did you do?  And what radio are you using?

73
Bob, K4TAX


----- Original Message ----- From: "Rodney" <w3krq@dejazzd.com>
To: <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Saturday, April 19, 2014 5:50 PM
Subject: [TenTec] mike


I made my 707 sound great.
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec


_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec



_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec


--
-- John K3GHH

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec


______________________________________________
enTec mailing list
enTec@contesting.com
ttp://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec



_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec



_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>