TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] mike

To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] mike
From: "Bob McGraw - K4TAX" <RMcGraw@Blomand.net>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2014 15:45:23 -0500
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
The configuration and not the element, i.e., mounting, vents, back loading and such largely impact the response and more importantly the polar response.

For that reason I prefer the 709 in place of the 708. One is omnidirectional and one is unidirectional.

73
Bob, K4TAX




----- Original Message ----- From: "Rodney" <w3krq@dejazzd.com>
To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Saturday, April 19, 2014 8:17 PM
Subject: Re: [TenTec] mike


708 and 709 have the same element.

-----Original Message----- From: K3GHH Sent: Saturday, April 19, 2014 9:14 PM To: tentec@contesting.com Subject: Re: [TenTec] mike 707 --> 709... I never see 708's mentioned, and that's what I have. What's the list's view of that mike? I'm a CW guy. Hope this isn't too far from the thread topic; Rodney's mention of these two skipping-over-708 mikes provoked the question.


On 04/19/2014 08:15 PM, Bob McGraw - K4TAX wrote:
Interesting approach.  Thanks.

73
Bob, K4TAX


----- Original Message ----- From: "Rodney" <w3krq@dejazzd.com>
To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Saturday, April 19, 2014 6:55 PM
Subject: Re: [TenTec] mike


Radio ORION11 I had tested my 709 and 707 with ham's that know me and 6 ham's that don't know me did a ab test 709 was better every time so I like the looks of the 707 so I traded the mike elements the 707 now has the 709 and the 709 now has the 707 element.

-----Original Message----- From: Bob McGraw - K4TAX
Sent: Saturday, April 19, 2014 7:48 PM
To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment
Subject: Re: [TenTec] mike

So what did you do?  And what radio are you using?

73
Bob, K4TAX


----- Original Message ----- From: "Rodney" <w3krq@dejazzd.com>
To: <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Saturday, April 19, 2014 5:50 PM
Subject: [TenTec] mike


I made my 707 sound great.
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec


_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec



_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec


--
-- John K3GHH

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec



_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>