Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+not\s+quite\s+OT\:\s+outboard\s+DSPs\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+not\s+quite\s+OT\:\s+outboard\s+DSPs\s*$/: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] not quite OT: outboard DSPs (score: 1): Author: "Michael Tortorella" <w2iy@verizon.net>; Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 19:55:53 -0500; Good evening, all: Some of using older Tentec equipment can benefit from outboard DSP audio filtering, so this is not quite OT..I wonder if I can tap the list wisdom regarding a preference for the JP; /archives//html/TenTec/2009-01/msg00150.html (6,801 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] not quite OT: outboard DSPs (score: 1): Author: "John" <brazos@rochester.rr.com>; Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 19:58:58 -0500; use the timewave The product is very good and the support is outstanding ! John Molenda Kb2huk -- Original Message -- From: "Michael Tortorella" <w2iy@verizon.net> To: <tentec@contesting.com> Sent: T; /archives//html/TenTec/2009-01/msg00151.html (8,935 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] not quite OT: outboard DSPs (score: 1): Author: "N4PY" <n4py@arrl.net>; Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 20:00:21 -0500; I have a timewave DSP-599ZX that works quite well. Carl Moreschi N4PY 121 Little Bell Drive Bell Mountain Hays, NC 28635 -- Original Message -- From: "Michael Tortorella" <w2iy@verizon.net> To: <tent; /archives//html/TenTec/2009-01/msg00152.html (8,612 bytes)
4. Re: [TenTec] not quite OT: outboard DSPs (score: 1): Author: W1dxh@aol.com; Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 20:19:51 EST; I used a timewave dsp 599 here with my Paragon II and really liked it. I sold it only because I got my Orion which I felt didn't need any outboard dsp, and that because the Paragon II would now be th; /archives//html/TenTec/2009-01/msg00153.html (8,430 bytes)
5. Re: [TenTec] not quite OT: outboard DSPs (score: 1): Author: "Bob McGraw - K4TAX" <RMcGraw@Blomand.net>; Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 19:43:44 -0600; I've used the Timewave DSP-9+ and the DSP-59 on the Paragon and Paragon II with very good success. No experience with the JPS. 73 Bob, K4TAX _______________________________________________ TenTec mai; /archives//html/TenTec/2009-01/msg00154.html (8,657 bytes)
6. Re: [TenTec] not quite OT: outboard DSPs (score: 1): Author: "Glenn AE0Q" <gm5bkc@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 18:43:31 -0700; Hi Mike, I owned a NIR-10 and NIR-12 before trying the DSP-59+ and found the JPS units were more optimized for SSB. I really wanted one for CW and the Timewave is GREAT for CW!!!!! Here is an article; /archives//html/TenTec/2009-01/msg00158.html (9,069 bytes)
7. Re: [TenTec] not quite OT: outboard DSPs (score: 1): Author: "Duane Calvin" <ac5aa1@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 20:38:51 -0600; Hi Mike, I've used both, and I liked the NIR-12 much better than the DSP, although it works also. The NIR uses two processors and two different algorithms for digital signal processing. One of them (; /archives//html/TenTec/2009-01/msg00159.html (9,119 bytes)
8. Re: [TenTec] not quite OT: outboard DSPs (score: 1): Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@hawaiiantel.net>; Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 17:50:53 -1000; I've got a NIR12 and like how it works. Haven't tried it with my Omni VI yet. I was wondering about connecting it where the Omni VI built in DSP is, INSTEAD of the Omni VI DSP. I wonder if anyone has; /archives//html/TenTec/2009-01/msg00160.html (9,122 bytes)
9. Re: [TenTec] not quite OT: outboard DSPs (score: 1): Author: AL7CR <al7cr@punakea.com>; Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 08:34:35 -0800; I have used both extensively on SSB and the NIR-12 is by far the better unit. It offers the choice of spectral subtraction, adaptive filtering, or both in series. There simply is no comparison betwee; /archives//html/TenTec/2009-01/msg00163.html (9,474 bytes)
10. Re: [TenTec] not quite OT: outboard DSPs (score: 1): Author: "Michael Tortorella" <w2iy@verizon.net>; Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 12:17:59 -0500; Dean and many others who replied, First, let me say thank you to all who weighed in on this topic. I have learned a lot from you all. A private message that did not get to the list also recommended t; /archives//html/TenTec/2009-01/msg00164.html (10,885 bytes)
11. Re: [TenTec] not quite OT: outboard DSPs (score: 1): Author: Stuart Rohre <rohre@arlut.utexas.edu>; Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 15:10:20 -0600; The Datong were very popular CW filters in their day. Autek also made a good outboard CW filter. You see them at Swap meets for $15 to 30. 73, Stuart Rohre K5KVH _____________________________________; /archives//html/TenTec/2009-01/msg00165.html (8,357 bytes)
12. Re: [TenTec] not quite OT: outboard DSPs (score: 1): Author: "CSM$r$ Gary Huber" <glhuber@msn.com>; Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 16:55:49 -0600; I've been following this thread and was interested in the comments regarding the JPS NIR units. I had one (but can't remember which one) which I used for several years. I "up-graded" it when a new RO; /archives//html/TenTec/2009-01/msg00166.html (14,146 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 12
Page: [1]