Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+transceiver\s+test\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+transceiver\s+test\s*$/: 16 ]

Total 16 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] transceiver test (score: 1): Author: "Rob Atkinson, K5UJ" <k5uj@hotmail.com>; Date: Sun, 06 Jun 2004 14:25:32 +0000; Bob, what i would do is get a separate rx and one of those frequency standards that used to be available (don't know if they still are or not) that consisted of a 1 mhz xtal oscillator in a small box; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-06/msg00096.html (7,747 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] transceiver test (score: 1): Author: Robert & Linda McGraw K4TAX <RMcGraw@Blomand.Net>; Date: Sun, 06 Jun 2004 21:57:05 -0500; Thanks for the various responses, ideas and such. I'll expound on the issue a bit further. To determine the transmit frequency is easy. I have a very good, highly accurate frequency counter at my dis; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-06/msg00120.html (11,408 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] transceiver test (score: 1): Author: "M. P. Haynes" <k4beh@juno.com>; Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2004 10:00:40 -0400; Hi Bob, The best way I have found to accurately determine my receiver frequency is to simply tune in WWV and listen to the modulated AM DSB tones. As you listen with your rcvr in SSB mode simply swit; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-06/msg00122.html (7,763 bytes)
4. [TenTec] transceiver test (score: 1): Author: "Rob Atkinson, K5UJ" <k5uj@hotmail.com>; Date: Mon, 07 Jun 2004 17:21:57 +0000; I have had the same experience on SSB with the Omni VI I use. I have been told I am off frequency by the station I'm talking to, and if I move the vfo down about 30 or 40 hz (this on LSB) they will s; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-06/msg00127.html (7,700 bytes)
5. Re: [TenTec] transceiver test (score: 1): Author: Robert & Linda McGraw K4TAX <RMcGraw@Blomand.Net>; Date: Mon, 07 Jun 2004 13:19:59 -0500; I am beginning to wonder if this phenomena is not related to the BFO carrier position relative to the slope of the bandpass filter. This can be quite different from brand to brand of transceiver as e; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-06/msg00128.html (10,018 bytes)
6. Re: [TenTec] transceiver test (score: 1): Author: Duane A Calvin <ac5aa@juno.com>; Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2004 13:31:59 -0500; Now that I can hear great low frequency response with my new Orion, I'm getting a kick out of the guys running expensive microphones and TX audio equalization (W2IHY boxes and more). Some of them hav; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-06/msg00129.html (7,628 bytes)
7. Re: [TenTec] transceiver test (score: 1): Author: Ken Hunter <kenh@hunters.org>; Date: Mon, 07 Jun 2004 14:58:09 -0400; "with anything but perfect band condx. Kind of reminds me of kids when they first discover "high fidelity stereo" with the cranked up bass and the loudness contour switched in . . . :-)" Heyyy now...; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-06/msg00130.html (9,850 bytes)
8. Re: [TenTec] transceiver test (score: 1): Author: James E McClellan <n8luv_jm@juno.com>; Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2004 14:57:23 -0400; Hi TenTec Gang, This is not only on the Omni or Paragon stations. I have the same problem with my new Argonaut-V. Many people keep telling me I am off frequency when I am transmitting SSTV - Digital; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-06/msg00131.html (9,873 bytes)
9. Re: [TenTec] transceiver test (score: 1): Author: Robert & Linda McGraw K4TAX <RMcGraw@Blomand.Net>; Date: Mon, 07 Jun 2004 14:08:53 -0500; The typical SSB bandpass system is only about 2.4 KHz wide no matter what one does to it or tries to cram through it. The biggest problem I've observed with many stations seem to be related to poor r; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-06/msg00132.html (10,157 bytes)
10. Re: [TenTec] transceiver test (score: 1): Author: "holladayfd" <holladayfd@multipro.com>; Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2004 14:21:19 -0500; Duane, Those are members of Tau Epsilon Beta, otherwise known as the Order of Tin Eared Baboons! 73, Frank, K4VMO -- Original Message -- From: "Duane A Calvin" <ac5aa@juno.com> To: <tentec@contesting; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-06/msg00133.html (9,307 bytes)
11. Re: [TenTec] transceiver test (score: 1): Author: Robert & Linda McGraw K4TAX <RMcGraw@Blomand.Net>; Date: Mon, 07 Jun 2004 14:21:34 -0500; I've a Paragon of 1991 vintage, a Paragon II and an Omni VI+. I get the same reports on all three. I've decided that it is a psychoacoustic issue more than anything. Again, based on my measurement of; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-06/msg00134.html (11,482 bytes)
12. Re: [TenTec] transceiver test (score: 1): Author: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>; Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2004 16:21:49 -0400; I wish everyone would read the below statements over and over again until it is firmly implanted in their mind. HAM RADIO's are not the equipment to be discussing cycles of frequency accuracy. When y; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-06/msg00138.html (9,324 bytes)
13. [TenTec] transceiver test (score: 1): Author: "Rob Atkinson, K5UJ" <k5uj@hotmail.com>; Date: Mon, 07 Jun 2004 22:49:12 +0000; I'd like to know what frequency(ies) they're operating on. Rob/K5UJ <<<Duane, Those are members of Tau Epsilon Beta, otherwise known as the Order of Tin Eared Baboons! 73, Frank, K4VMO -- Original Me; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-06/msg00141.html (9,183 bytes)
14. [TenTec] transceiver test (score: 1): Author: "Rob Atkinson, K5UJ" <k5uj@hotmail.com>; Date: Mon, 07 Jun 2004 23:08:06 +0000; <<<The typical SSB bandpass system is only about 2.4 KHz wide no matter what one does to it or tries to cram through it.>>> Well, this was true until around 1992 or so. Most new rigs of the past 10 y; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-06/msg00143.html (9,480 bytes)
15. RE: [TenTec] transceiver test (score: 1): Author: "Cliff KD4GT" <kd4gt@bellsouth.net>; Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2004 19:55:12 -0400; Many people try to equate accuracy with precision. The display may have 1Hz precision but that does not indicate the master oscillator has that same degree of accuracy. Just because you can tell one; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-06/msg00144.html (9,410 bytes)
16. [TenTec] transceiver test (score: 1): Author: "Rob Atkinson, K5UJ" <k5uj@hotmail.com>; Date: Tue, 08 Jun 2004 00:06:36 +0000; I wish all the guys who think their bandscopes on their Pro IIs are professional grade spectrum analyzers would read what follows as well. Rob/K5UJ <<<I wish everyone would read the below statements; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-06/msg00145.html (9,902 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 16
Page: [1]