Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+vertical\s+radials\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+vertical\s+radials\s*$/: 11 ]

Total 11 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] vertical radials (score: 1): Author: MIKE BRYCE <prosolar@sssnet.com>; Date: Sat, 05 Jun 2004 12:28:21 -0400; Hola boys and girls.. My hy gain hy tower is on its way. should be here within a week now... about those radials.. I plan on operating 160 meters with this antenna. I have the room, so should I go wi; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-06/msg00064.html (7,539 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] vertical radials (score: 1): Author: "Dave Edwards" <kd2e@comcast.net>; Date: Sat, 5 Jun 2004 12:36:32 -0400; Feed them directly, and hang 'em up in the trees as a dipole. Just before they became MFJ, I was speaking with a tech rep from HyGain. There was an option for the tower...I think it was a coil and so; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-06/msg00065.html (9,145 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] vertical radials (score: 1): Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Sat, 05 Jun 2004 11:44:17 -0500; There are some excellent tech articles on this topic on the ARRL website. I strongly suggest that you read them. The executive summary is that 1) the more radials the better; 2) the longer the radia; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-06/msg00067.html (7,409 bytes)
4. Re: [TenTec] vertical radials (score: 1): Author: ac5e@comcast.net; Date: Sat, 05 Jun 2004 17:12:09 +0000; Mike, that's sort of a sore subject around here - and one of the major considerations in deciding to finally build the new house and move to the farm. Where my neighbor the alderman won't have a word; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-06/msg00068.html (8,897 bytes)
5. Re: [TenTec] vertical radials (score: 1): Author: MIKE BRYCE <prosolar@sssnet.com>; Date: Sat, 05 Jun 2004 13:47:25 -0400; MIG welding wire??? never thought of that... does the stuff stay curled (like it comes off of the roll?) or will it straighten out when put on the ground? what gauge does it come in? We have MIG weld; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-06/msg00070.html (7,854 bytes)
6. [TenTec] vertical radials (score: 1): Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Sat, 05 Jun 2004 16:22:26 -0400; wave radials for 160 meters? Mike, this is off the top of my head since I am not close to my bookcase, but I believe this topic is well covered in ON4UN's latest Low Band DX-ing book. He has a formul; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-06/msg00080.html (9,306 bytes)
7. Re: [TenTec] vertical radials (score: 1): Author: ac5e@comcast.net; Date: Sat, 05 Jun 2004 20:37:35 +0000; Hi again Mike. I use an edger, myself, with a spool holder hose clamped to the handle. My number twelves generally do a good job of closing the trench behind the gadget. But I see no reason why a rea; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-06/msg00081.html (8,800 bytes)
8. Re: [TenTec] vertical radials (score: 1): Author: David Kelley <dkelley@bucknell.edu>; Date: Sun, 06 Jun 2004 15:17:06 -0400; Mike, For in-ground radials you don't need to worry about getting the lengths exactly right. As someone else said, the longer the better, but if you have settled on 1/4 wave (free space length) as a; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-06/msg00105.html (10,248 bytes)
9. Re: [TenTec] vertical radials (score: 1): Author: "Stuart Rohre" <rohre@arlut.utexas.edu>; Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2004 15:06:24 -0500; Use of 234 over frequency in MHz is plenty good for your radials. Real Earth is going to alter the effective resonance of them due to capacity anyway, so it doe not matter that much, unless you can c; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-06/msg00136.html (8,843 bytes)
10. Re: [TenTec] vertical radials (score: 1): Author: "Stuart Rohre" <rohre@arlut.utexas.edu>; Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2004 15:14:39 -0500; Bill is right in what he remembers about radial numbers. For quarter wave 60 brings you most of the good results. There is very little improvement above that. When you increase the length of the radi; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-06/msg00137.html (9,074 bytes)
11. Re: [TenTec] vertical radials (score: 1): Author: ac5e@comcast.net; Date: Mon, 07 Jun 2004 20:43:45 +0000; Actually, if you measure the current along an on-ground radial you will find there's virtually no current flowing in the radial much beyond the 1/10th wavelength point. And the current falls off even; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-06/msg00139.html (9,321 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 11
Page: [1]