Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+wide\s+signals\s*$/: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] wide signals (score: 1)
Author: don@corporatemedia.com (Don)
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 1999 09:05:34 -0500
Perhaps it's only because I am on the air for a limited amount of time each year (during four major contests & perhaps the 10M & 160M tests), but I really never encounter these broad, wide signals. I
/archives//html/TenTec/1999-12/msg00242.html (8,407 bytes)

2. [TenTec] wide signals (score: 1)
Author: dacalvin@us.ibm.com (dacalvin@us.ibm.com)
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 1999 08:27:41 -0600
Amen to your last statement. I went up to the SSB portion of 10 to grab some multipliers, and then returned to CW as soon as my ears started screaming. 10m was really hopping last weekend, and the si
/archives//html/TenTec/1999-12/msg00247.html (9,838 bytes)

3. [TenTec] wide signals (score: 1)
Author: cshyde@yahoo.com (Carl Hyde)
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 1999 06:35:29 -0800 (PST)
According to the Part 97 principal of "good amateur practice" when you are advised that your signal is over S-9 the prudent, polite and proper technique of a good operator is to reduce power. Of cour
/archives//html/TenTec/1999-12/msg00248.html (10,720 bytes)

4. [TenTec] wide signals (score: 1)
Author: reid.w.simmons@intel.com (Simmons, Reid W)
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 1999 08:38:29 -0800
Did I miss some new FCC rule that now assigns "personal" frequencies to hams? :) Reid, K7YX It's "you're too wide on my frequency..." But I digress...that's why CW's more fun! -- FAQ on WWW: http://w
/archives//html/TenTec/1999-12/msg00272.html (8,257 bytes)

5. [TenTec] wide signals (score: 1)
Author: m.rauchfuss@worldnet.att.net (Mark Rauchfuss)
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 1999 22:14:46 -0800
No Don, You are incorrect!!! That is why SINGLE SIDE band became to be a winner, precisely for the very reason that you cite. You see, with SINGLE SIDE BAND that it is possible to have the signal str
/archives//html/TenTec/1999-12/msg00288.html (9,723 bytes)

6. [TenTec] wide signals (score: 1)
Author: m.rauchfuss@worldnet.att.net (Mark Rauchfuss)
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 1999 22:36:36 -0800
No you did not. However you appear to have missed the social exposure to the principles of courtesy and to the engineering practices of conservation of scarce resources (ie band space), Mark, KB8GKZ
/archives//html/TenTec/1999-12/msg00289.html (9,418 bytes)

7. [TenTec] wide signals (score: 1)
Author: chuck@topsail.org (Chuck Murcko)
Date: Thu, 16 Dec 1999 00:47:41 -0500
Apparently you missed the smiley ;) -- Chuck Chuck Murcko Here: chuck.murcko@trintech.com There: chuck@topsail.org -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm Submissions: tentec@contestin
/archives//html/TenTec/1999-12/msg00290.html (10,383 bytes)

8. [TenTec] wide signals (score: 1)
Author: m.rauchfuss@worldnet.att.net (Mark Rauchfuss)
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 1999 23:23:31 -0800
Yuo are correct, Chuck. I did not employ a bit of levity. I suppose that I have been worn down by thoughtless behavios of so many fellow hams. It saddens and annoys me that we all fail to think. mark
/archives//html/TenTec/1999-12/msg00291.html (11,074 bytes)

9. [TenTec] wide signals (score: 1)
Author: N4NT@wireco.net (Michael O. Hyder)
Date: Thu, 16 Dec 1999 09:59:31 -0500
You know, if a fellow calls me an ass, I keep on about my business. But when a second fellow calls me one, I'd better turn around and look for a tail . . . 73 de Mike N4NT@wireco.net to unless of --
/archives//html/TenTec/1999-12/msg00293.html (11,015 bytes)

10. [TenTec] wide signals (score: 1)
Author: m.rauchfuss@worldnet.att.net (Mark Rauchfuss)
Date: Thu, 16 Dec 1999 21:16:17 -0800
Mike, I quite agree. Mark, KB8GKZ -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm Submissions: tentec@contesting.com Administrative requests: tentec-REQUEST@contesting.com Problems: owner-tent
/archives//html/TenTec/1999-12/msg00300.html (11,635 bytes)

11. [TenTec] wide signals (score: 1)
Author: reid.w.simmons@intel.com (Simmons, Reid W)
Date: Tue, 21 Dec 1999 09:15:08 -0800
Mark; I think you totally missed the "dry humor" in my response. Try reading it again - carefully. Reid, K7YX Hamming since 1961 No you did not. However you appear to have missed the social exposure
/archives//html/TenTec/1999-12/msg00431.html (9,833 bytes)

12. [TenTec] wide signals (score: 1)
Author: reid.w.simmons@intel.com (Simmons, Reid W)
Date: Tue, 21 Dec 1999 09:54:27 -0800
Mark; It is refreshing to see that a relative newcomer (judging by your call sign, that is) shows concern for proper ham behavior and references the Amateur's Code of Conduct. Now if only ALL hams wo
/archives//html/TenTec/1999-12/msg00432.html (11,596 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu