Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+\[Tower\s+Talk\]\s+Ground\s+wire\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+\[Tower\s+Talk\]\s+Ground\s+wire\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TowerTalk] [Tower Talk] Ground wire (score: 1): Author: "Kenny Young" <towertalk@mindspring.com>; Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 19:01:31 -0400; Actually the NEC says the smallest conductor that can be paralleled is 1/0. 73, Kenny, AB4GG --Original Message-- From: towertalk-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:towertalk-bounces@contesting.com] On B; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-09/msg00587.html (8,911 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] [Tower Talk] Ground wire (score: 1): Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>; Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 17:30:37 -0700; Kenny Young wrote: Actually the NEC says the smallest conductor that can be paralleled is 1/0. 73, Kenny, AB4GG Where is that in the code? Art.310.4 Wiring methods? I would think that you could persu; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-09/msg00588.html (8,558 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] [Tower Talk] Ground wire (score: 1): Author: "Ken Young" <Ken@youngelectric.net>; Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 11:20:06 -0400; Article 310.4 does apply to the grounding conductor. What website did you see that said different? You wouldn't stand a chance at persuading the inspectors differently here. They are "by the book, no; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-09/msg00602.html (8,649 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] [Tower Talk] Ground wire (score: 1): Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>; Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 17:43:47 -0700; Several places.. see for instance http://wwww.iaei.org/subscriber/magazine/07_a/johnston.html or google "parallel grounding conductor 310" and you'll get a bunch of hits. For instance, maybe you've g; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-09/msg00605.html (8,226 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]