Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+10\s+Meter\s+2\s+Stack\,\s+3\s+Stack\s+vs\.\s+Higher\s+Beam\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+10\s+Meter\s+2\s+Stack\,\s+3\s+Stack\s+vs\.\s+Higher\s+Beam\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] 10 Meter 2 Stack, 3 Stack vs. Higher Beam (score: 1): Author: Hanksm703@aol.com; Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 12:10:47 EDT; Trying to gain an understanding of what I would be better off with on 10 Meters; a 2 or 3 stack of medium - longer boom 10 meter beams, or just one higher 10 Meter beam at maybe 120 - 140 feet? My pr; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-06/msg00463.html (7,869 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] 10 Meter 2 Stack, 3 Stack vs. Higher Beam (score: 1): Author: <donovanf@starpower.net>; Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 12:26:26 -0400 (EDT); Hank, Although a single very high 10 meter Yagi is by far the best choice at this point in the solar cycle, it will be inadequate when strong F-layer propagation returns. Three equally spaced large Y; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-06/msg00465.html (9,125 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] 10 Meter 2 Stack, 3 Stack vs. Higher Beam (score: 1): Author: K7LXC@aol.com; Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 15:55:36 EDT; 10 Meters; a 2 or 3 stack of medium - longer boom 10 meter beams, or just one higher 10 Meter beam at maybe 120 - 140 feet? Have you modeled it in TA? I think you'll find that a single yagi that high; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-06/msg00472.html (8,438 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]