Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+160M\s+DIPOLE\s+USIGN\s+COAX\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+160M\s+DIPOLE\s+USIGN\s+COAX\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] 160M DIPOLE USIGN COAX (score: 1): Author: "J. Hector Garcia XE2K" <hector@telecom1.net>; Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2005 08:02:09 PST; TT's: I read the last NCJ, where K3LR 160m Dipole as sloper appears, i will like to try something like this here, but i have only 140 ft of tower, is possible to reduce the full size of the 160m dipo; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-11/msg00339.html (7,915 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] 160M DIPOLE USIGN COAX (score: 1): Author: "Rex Lint" <rex@lint.mv.com>; Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2005 11:29:20 -0500; Hector, Why not just bend the ends toward each other: I |\ I | \ I \ I > I / I | / I |/ I I Rex, K1HI TT's: I read the last NCJ, where K3LR 160m Dipole as sloper appears, i will like to try something; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-11/msg00340.html (8,462 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] 160M DIPOLE USIGN COAX (score: 1): Author: ersmar@comcast.net; Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2005 17:06:24 +0000; Hector: Many folks have asked on TowerTalk in the past about using coax for shortened ground radials, using the VF to shorten the required length. That doesn't work. The VF is important only when usi; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-11/msg00342.html (11,044 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] 160M DIPOLE USIGN COAX (score: 1): Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2005 11:22:45 -0600; I have also had some success using loading coils to electrically lengthen a dipole, both on 80 and 160. Barry, KU3X (HyPower Antenna Company) makes some nice loading coils that have worked quite well; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-11/msg00343.html (8,547 bytes)
5. Re: [TowerTalk] 160M DIPOLE USIGN COAX (score: 1): Author: "hasan schiers" <schiers@netins.net>; Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2005 11:27:07 -0600; When I have used and modeled this antenna I found that the wire is not such much a radial, as a "slant wire feed" for the tower. The tower/beam/etc are in fact doing the radiating and the wire is jus; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-11/msg00344.html (13,265 bytes)
6. Re: [TowerTalk] 160M DIPOLE USIGN COAX (score: 1): Author: ersmar@comcast.net; Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2005 17:40:15 +0000; Hasan: My tower has a moderate ground field underneath it as I also use the tower with a shunt-feed gamma wire on 160M. I have about 135 feet of #2 copper wire and a dozen copper ground rods in the e; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-11/msg00345.html (15,666 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]