Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+40\-2CD\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+40\-2CD\s*$/: 21 ]

Total 21 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] 40-2CD (score: 1): Author: henry@pacinfo.com (henry gillow-wiles); Date: Fri, 08 Jan 1999 22:39:02 -0800; I'm looking for the L and C used in the CC 40-2CD. I'm trying to model the thing, using nec4win. tnx...... end Henry KB7RTA henry@pacinfo.com -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.htm; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-01/msg00145.html (6,662 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] 40-2cd (score: 1): Author: rodman@acsu.buffalo.edu (D. Rodman, MD); Date: Tue, 1 Sep 1998 06:32:16 -0400 (EDT); Antenna interaction can be modeled with computer simulation. My analysis shows it becomes problematic when one closes the gap to less than 10 feet between antenna. Typically electrostatic shielding c; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-09/msg00003.html (8,053 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] 40-2cd (score: 1): Author: kmccourt@tbaytel.net (VE3KKM); Date: Thu, 10 Sep 1998 16:11:38 -0700; Hi All, I have done the following checks up to this point: Rotated the beam 45 degress on the mast (no change) Removed beam checked the loading coils and done the mods with machine screws,some corros; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-09/msg00261.html (8,863 bytes)
4. [TowerTalk] 40-2cd (score: 1): Author: kmccourt@tbaytel.net (VE3KKM); Date: Mon, 31 Aug 1998 20:33:34 -0700; Hello,I have a question on the performance of the 40-2cd.Since I have raised the beam to 70` the performance has degraded.I`m just wondering if I have a problem with the loading coils.I have seen a s; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-08/msg01044.html (6,538 bytes)
5. [TowerTalk] 40-2CD (score: 1): Author: k1my@nlis.net (Bruce Makas); Date: Fri, 11 Jul 1997 16:14:22 -0400; Thanks to the generosity of several tower talkers, I now have a copy of W6QHS's and N4KG's articles on how to modify the 40-2 CD to improve it's survivability. I ran off 10 copies at work and will ma; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-07/msg00411.html (8,977 bytes)
6. [TowerTalk] 40-2cd (score: 1): Author: kcubilo@freeway.net (ken cubilo); Date: Fri, 11 Jul 1997 16:18:52 -0400; seem awhile ago someone else asked this question but here goes. anyone using the 40-2cd at low heights like 30 feet or so and how is the performance at that height? should i just keep my phased 40 me; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-07/msg00412.html (6,821 bytes)
7. [TowerTalk] 40-2CD (score: 1): Author: k1my@nlis.net (Bruce Makas); Date: Fri, 11 Jul 1997 16:14:22 -0400; This attachment was sent as file (File name not found) It was saved in file 02790000 ATTCHMNT A Note: One or more attachments were saved to your personal storage ("A" disk). Most programs and documen; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-07/msg00422.html (7,182 bytes)
8. [TowerTalk] 40-2CD (score: 1): Author: k1my@nlis.net (Bruce Makas); Date: Wed, 04 Jun 1997 18:20:43 -0400; I'm going to be putting up a 40-2 to use during contests and I'm thinking of 100' to 120' as the height. Is there an optimal height for this antenna from coastal Maine or is it just "the higher the b; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-06/msg00179.html (7,814 bytes)
9. [TowerTalk] 40-2CD (score: 1): Author: "Jack Schuster" <w1wef@intergate.com>; Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 22:03:22 -0400; There was another by W4KG (K4KG?...the one in Al!) which was simpler than Dave Leeson's but worked fine for me on two antennas. I dont have it here, but maybe someone else can forward it to you. 73 J; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-07/msg00007.html (6,984 bytes)
10. Re: [TowerTalk] 40-2CD (score: 1): Author: KI7WX@aol.com; Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2004 18:32:16 -0400; Jack is likely thinking of Tom, N4KG, and his NJC artical: Simplified Strengthening of the Cushcraft 40-2CD N4KG 1994 NCJ, Mar/Apr p14 Heh, Jack busted Tom's call twice in one post, that's like minus; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-07/msg00020.html (6,990 bytes)
11. Re: [TowerTalk] 40-2CD (score: 1): Author: k2qmf@juno.com; Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2004 12:34:59 -0400; Hello All, How can I get a copy of this article??? Thanks in advance and 73, Ted K2QMF ________________________________________________________________ The best thing to hit the Internet in years - J; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-07/msg00030.html (8,403 bytes)
12. [TowerTalk] 40-2CD (score: 1): Author: Michael Dinkelman <mwdink@eskimo.com>; Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2004 06:01:39 -0700; Anybody have the final measurements for the 40-2CD? Thought it might be the same as the XM240 but what I am getting on the used antenna one I bought is about an 1.5 inches off from what I expected (b; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-07/msg00523.html (7,682 bytes)
13. Re: [TowerTalk] 40-2CD (score: 1): Author: Michael Dinkelman <mwdink@eskimo.com>; Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2004 07:06:02 -0700; That was quick - thanks to all who responded! 73 dink At 06:01 AM 7/20/2004, Michael Dinkelman wrote: Anybody have the final measurements for the 40-2CD? _____________________________________________; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-07/msg00524.html (7,746 bytes)
14. [TowerTalk] 40-2CD (score: 1): Author: Lloyd Bell <k5zo@yahoo.com>; Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2007 09:32:01 -0800 (PST); Hello All I'm trying to replace some traps and I'm wondering what kind of heat shrink to use and a supplier? It looks like the old heat shrink had some kind of mastic on the inside. Any help would be; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-12/msg00047.html (6,671 bytes)
15. Re: [TowerTalk] 40-2CD (score: 1): Author: Mike Fatchett W0MU <w0mu@w0mu.com>; Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2007 18:42:10 -0700; That is probably a "flooded" heat shrink tubing to keep out the moisture. You can find it by searching online. I think this tubing is double walled with a sealant in the middle. _____________________; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-12/msg00051.html (7,932 bytes)
16. Re: [TowerTalk] 40-2CD (score: 1): Author: "Ted Bryant" <w4nz@comcast.net>; Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2007 08:05:10 -0500; Lloyd, I had to replace the original screws that connect the loading coil to the tubing in each loading coil assembly (LCA) on my Cushcraft 402CD. I split the original heat shrink and trimmed it back; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-12/msg00058.html (8,538 bytes)
17. Re: [TowerTalk] 40-2CD (score: 1): Author: "Mike Fatchett W0MU" <w0mu@w0mu.com>; Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2007 13:50:17 -0700; Speaking of loose screws....This was a problem even on the newer XM240 that the screws were loose as shipped brand new. Something to check before the antenna goes up in the air. Alternatively you cou; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-12/msg00067.html (9,369 bytes)
18. Re: [TowerTalk] 40-2CD (score: 1): Author: Doug Renwick <ve5ra@sasktel.net>; Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2007 20:01:53 -0600; Historically it would be best to replace the self taping SS screw and replace it with a bolt. I drilled the hole through with a 5/32" bit, and used a 6-32 x 1 1/4" SS bolt and filed the bolt flush to; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-12/msg00074.html (9,785 bytes)
19. Re: [TowerTalk] 40-2CD (score: 1): Author: K4SAV <RadioIR@charter.net>; Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2007 20:41:42 -0600; I counted 66 turns on my XM240 coils. Maybe that's the reason I had a lot of trouble getting it to go low enough in frequency. I would expect to see some kind of difference, either element length or; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-12/msg00075.html (8,388 bytes)
20. Re: [TowerTalk] 40-2CD (score: 1): Author: "Ron Chambers" <rwchambers@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2007 08:55:33 -0600; Unless I am nuts I have an email from Cushcraft a few months back where I quizzed them about that very thing and am 99% sure they said they were the same. Will look back. Ron N5QQ ___________________; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-12/msg00087.html (9,400 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]