Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+40m\s+4\s+Square\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+40m\s+4\s+Square\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] 40m 4 Square (score: 1): Author: w7why@harborside.com (Tom Osborne); Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2001 16:30:08 -0700; This is an interesting question. What is the advantage of a 4 square over a 3 vertical array. I have a 3 vertical array on 40 and it is switchable in 6 different directions. Directivity seems to be v; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-07/msg00042.html (7,600 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] 40m 4 Square (score: 1): Author: K3BU@aol.com (K3BU@aol.com); Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2001 22:23:31 EDT; Much better pattern, more gain, rejection and RX performance (S/N discrimination). I tried various 3 el. configurations, they were inferior to 4 sq. Yuri, K3BU List Sponsor: Are you thinking about in; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-07/msg00044.html (7,437 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] 40m 4 Square (score: 1): Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2001 23:26:59 -0400; Probably not much, if the three vertical array is done correctly. Traditional 4 squares with 90/180 degree phasing are off a tiny bit in phase delay from optimum, so they don't work quite as well as; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-07/msg00058.html (8,507 bytes)
4. [TowerTalk] 40m 4 Square (score: 1): Author: n4kg@juno.com (n4kg@juno.com); Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2001 23:41:34 -0600; My guess is that the original question refered to a 3L vertical array in a triangle, NOT in line, which can provide the 6 directions mentioned. Tom N4KG ______________________________________________; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-07/msg00059.html (7,521 bytes)
5. [TowerTalk] 40m 4 Square (score: 1): Author: richmondp@home.com (RichmondP); Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2001 16:43:46 -0400; Hello, I am in the process of constructing a 40 meter four square and need advice. What type of aluminum or pvc should I use to construct my vetricals and what taper would the best to use. The vertic; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-06/msg00626.html (7,255 bytes)
6. [TowerTalk] 40m 4 Square (score: 1): Author: k4sqr@juno.com (k4sqr@juno.com); Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2001 18:29:15 -0400; Patrick; Using vertical formula of 234/7.000=33.4 feet or 33 feet 4 & 5/8 inches. 33'4" will certainly be a good starting point for 7.0. Starting with 2" OD and going up the chart of smaller sizes, s; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-06/msg00627.html (9,239 bytes)
7. [TowerTalk] 40m 4 Square (score: 1): Author: n4kg@juno.com (n4kg@juno.com); Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2001 18:03:30 -0600; My friend NN4T had problems keeping his 40 ft top loaded 80M verticals up. I suggested he use 2 inch diameter 6 ft long sections with 1-7/8 couplers at each joint. They were sufficiently rigid yet li; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-06/msg00628.html (11,654 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]