Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+A\s+Sad\s+Precedent\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+A\s+Sad\s+Precedent\s*$/: 27 ]

Total 27 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] A Sad Precedent (score: 1): Author: w5ba@csi.com (Gerald D'Entremont); Date: Tue, 23 Feb 1999 08:37:42 -0600; All excerpted from Houston Chronicle 2-23-99, copyrighted that publication. Emphasis mine. "In what is called the first decision of its kind, a jury Monday ordered GTE Wireless to pay $1.2 MILLION to; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-02/msg00451.html (10,238 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] A Sad Precedent (score: 1): Author: K3BU@aol.com (K3BU@aol.com); Date: Tue, 23 Feb 1999 10:13:05 EST; << "In what is called the first decision of its kind, a jury Monday ordered GTE Wireless to pay $1.2 MILLION to a city of Bunker Hill Village couple who claim a 100-foot cellular phone TOWER NEAR the; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-02/msg00454.html (9,613 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] A Sad Precedent (score: 1): Author: jfeustle@uoft02.utoledo.edu (jfeustle); Date: Tue, 23 Feb 1999 10:29:23 -0500; I would imagine that this verdict will be appealed. If it is anywhere close to being as calamitous as was presented, there will certainly be further litigation. Remember, vox populi ain't the same as; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-02/msg00455.html (8,419 bytes)
4. [TowerTalk] A Sad Precedent (score: 1): Author: designserv@ipass.net (LYN); Date: Tue, 23 Feb 1999 10:50:08 -0500; Now that you've asked, I can wish that the forefathers had put in some kind of enforcible rule that would tar and feather the greedy attorneys and the instigators of such suits, as well as the dam fo; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-02/msg00456.html (8,532 bytes)
5. [TowerTalk] A Sad Precedent (score: 1): Author: wa3gin@erols.com (Dave Jordan); Date: Tue, 23 Feb 1999 11:04:20 -0500; If I got the story right GTE was the target of the suit rather than the city that leased the building site...I'd be very interested in knowing if the city was also included or excluded in the suit an; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-02/msg00457.html (8,769 bytes)
6. [TowerTalk] A Sad Precedent (score: 1): Author: agray@voicenet.com (Alan D. Gray); Date: Tue, 23 Feb 1999 11:25:36 -0500; Greedy Attorneys?... Some advice: lose that "line of reasoning" when you ask your attorney to defend you when you're sued by your neighbor when he take's issue with your tower. Instigators?...Guess t; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-02/msg00459.html (10,592 bytes)
7. [TowerTalk] A Sad Precedent (score: 1): Author: westover@horizon.sri.com (Doug Westover ); Date: Tue, 23 Feb 1999 08:22:09 -0800; But the trouble with a marsh is that it is probably a protected wetland and you'll have the EPA all over you. 73, Doug W6JD; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-02/msg00460.html (8,191 bytes)
8. [TowerTalk] A Sad Precedent (score: 1): Author: K3BU@aol.com (K3BU@aol.com); Date: Tue, 23 Feb 1999 10:13:05 EST; << "In what is called the first decision of its kind, a jury Monday ordered GTE Wireless to pay $1.2 MILLION to a city of Bunker Hill Village couple who claim a 100-foot cellular phone TOWER NEAR the; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-02/msg00461.html (10,368 bytes)
9. [TowerTalk] A Sad Precedent (score: 1): Author: ronc@sonic.net (Ron Castro); Date: Tue, 23 Feb 1999 09:04:06 -0800; Excuse me, but I seem to get the jist that the $1,200,000 award was just 10% of the property value. It's hard to imagine anybody with a $12 million dollar home that didn't get it by "big corperate pr; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-02/msg00463.html (9,635 bytes)
10. [TowerTalk] A Sad Precedent (score: 1): Author: cfb@en.com (Carl -WA8AA-); Date: Tue, 23 Feb 1999 12:15:09 -0500; Not an original. de Carl -WA8AA- -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html Submissions: towertalk@contesting.com Administrative requests: towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com Problems:; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-02/msg00464.html (12,846 bytes)
11. [TowerTalk] A Sad Precedent (score: 1): Author: w5ba@csi.com (Gerald D'Entremont); Date: Tue, 23 Feb 1999 11:28:01 -0600; <SNIP> <snip> For those who would like to read the entire text in it's unexpurgated detail, browser goes to: http://www.chron.com/content/story.html/metropolitan/200590 I made the dubious decision to; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-02/msg00465.html (11,405 bytes)
12. [TowerTalk] A Sad Precedent (score: 1): Author: agray@voicenet.com (Alan D. Gray); Date: Tue, 23 Feb 1999 12:42:26 -0500; As I read the case, the juror awarded damages for a lot more than the reduction in the homeowner's property value. Invasion of privacy, attorney's fees, etc. No, the jurors said that the State of Cal; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-02/msg00466.html (11,262 bytes)
13. [TowerTalk] A Sad Precedent (score: 1): Author: Jim" <jdc@ieway.com (Jim); Date: Tue, 23 Feb 1999 11:07:27 -0800; Juries now days have NOT A CLUE what kind of precedents they are setting. They hear the arguments for the plaintiff by the plaintiffs counsel and feel that "the big bad corporation" can spare a few b; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-02/msg00468.html (12,591 bytes)
14. [TowerTalk] A Sad Precedent (score: 1): Author: agray@voicenet.com (Alan D. Gray); Date: Tue, 23 Feb 1999 16:49:58 -0500; Precedents are set by judges. Juries are there to decide the facts. --Original Message-- From: Jim <jdc@ieway.com> To: K3BU@aol.com <K3BU@aol.com>; towertalk@contesting.com <towertalk@contesting.com>; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-02/msg00472.html (14,001 bytes)
15. [TowerTalk] A Sad Precedent (score: 1): Author: k3nd@yahoo.com (GALE STEWARD); Date: Tue, 23 Feb 1999 13:31:24 -0800 (PST); Think your missing the point. It sets a dangerous precedent for tower owners (US)! If your neighbors decide they don't like your tower for whatever reason, whether proved or not, they can sue and gue; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-02/msg00473.html (10,175 bytes)
16. [TowerTalk] A Sad Precedent (score: 1): Author: k3nd@yahoo.com (GALE STEWARD); Date: Tue, 23 Feb 1999 13:18:03 -0800 (PST); A couple of beefy guys in a dark blue Mercury could take care of the problem! Monday couple who the value gun Knives, "civilization." would be "civilized" "Welcome to could be sued or in any radio ne; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-02/msg00474.html (12,544 bytes)
17. [TowerTalk] A Sad Precedent (score: 1): Author: agray@voicenet.com (Alan D. Gray); Date: Tue, 23 Feb 1999 19:35:07 -0500; Your confusing the situation. In all of the amateur tower cases I've seen, there has been no credible evidence of a reduction in property values caused by the amateur tower and no facts that anyone c; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-02/msg00476.html (11,932 bytes)
18. [TowerTalk] A Sad Precedent (score: 1): Author: ve3bbh@interlog.com (Paul Hicks, VE3BBH / VE3ZT); Date: Tue, 23 Feb 1999 19:55:43 -0500; Hey, Yuri, Why don't you move back up here where we can use (and appreciate) a world-class contester? 73, your buddy, Paul VE3ZT (ex VE3BBH) __________________________________________ sued any for ho; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-02/msg00477.html (10,494 bytes)
19. [TowerTalk] A Sad Precedent (score: 1): Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Tue, 23 Feb 1999 22:17:49 -0500; What a world. I refused to help a lawyer from California who wanted to illegally use an amplifier to communicate in the ham bands with his amplifier, and he threatened the manufacturer with a lawsui; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-02/msg00483.html (9,647 bytes)
20. [TowerTalk] A Sad Precedent (score: 1): Author: agray@voicenet.com (Alan D. Gray); Date: Tue, 23 Feb 1999 22:34:34 -0500; Yada, Yada, Yada.. The tower company, with the help of the kind folks in local gov't, thought they could stick it to a property owner for their own selfish gain. Now they gotta pay...tis really all t; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-02/msg00485.html (9,847 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]