Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+ARRL\s+and\s+LOTW\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+ARRL\s+and\s+LOTW\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] ARRL and LOTW (score: 1): Author: CGooden@insightbb.com (Chuck Gooden); Date: Thu Aug 14 00:43:56 2003; Jim, The ARRL is controlling LOTW and I firmly believe they will start to charge for the use of it just like the charge for the QSL buro, and any awards. I believe this is more so the case as I look; /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-08/msg00484.html (8,677 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] ARRL and LOTW (score: 1): Author: k0xu@iowadsl.net (Jim Rhodes); Date: Thu Aug 14 00:52:37 2003; If they don't charge much more than they do for the bureau then this would be bad because....? I don't think the bureau system is a real cash cow for the league. Jim Rhodes K0XU jim@rhodesend.net; /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-08/msg00486.html (9,855 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] ARRL and LOTW (score: 1): Author: aa6yq@ambersoft.com (Dave Bernstein); Date: Thu Aug 14 00:55:42 2003; Its certainly interesting to speculate. On one hand, ops will save substantial time, money, and stomach lining by using LOTW (when its finally working); the ARRL would be justified in seeking to reco; /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-08/msg00489.html (10,073 bytes)
4. [TowerTalk] ARRL and LOTW (score: 1): Author: ke3q@msn.com (RICHARD BOYD); Date: Thu Aug 14 11:51:21 2003; Unless I misunderstood, ARRL has announced they -will- charge for LOTW credits, though the fee will be nominal, they say. Maybe I should go back and read the transcript of N7NG's LOTW discussion at D; /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-08/msg00513.html (11,106 bytes)
5. [TowerTalk] ARRL and LOTW (score: 1): Author: rmoodyg@bellsouth.net (Richard M. Gillingham); Date: Thu Aug 14 14:45:00 2003; ARRL now charges for DXCC credits. LOTW will continue this policy. They're recouping expenses. I don't know if the fees will be more or not.. Gil, W1RG -- Original Message -- From: "RICHARD BOYD" <ke; /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-08/msg00527.html (12,186 bytes)
6. [TowerTalk] ARRL and LOTW (score: 1): Author: kr1g@hotmail.com (ted demopoulos); Date: Thu Aug 14 10:29:52 2003; Well, the ARRL is controlling LOTW just like I control my antenna farm - I built it and its mine. They built LOTW, its theirs. Ahhh, make that ours - the members - and I fully expect that we will ben; /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-08/msg00528.html (10,171 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]