Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Coax\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Coax\s*$/: 153 ]

Total 153 documents matching your query.

61. Re: [TowerTalk] Coax (score: 1): Author: "Keith Dutson" <kdutson@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 16:11:52 -0500; If budget is unlimited, use Andrews 7/8 Heliax from station to tower base. If not, run LMR400 instead. From there run regular flexible coax up the rower. I use Belden 9913F7, but there are many choic; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-09/msg00416.html (8,143 bytes)
62. Re: [TowerTalk] Coax (score: 1): Author: "K8RI on Tower talk" <k8ri-tower@charter.net>; Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 18:21:25 -0400; It's 228 feet from the station to the antennas here. I use LMR 400, but plan on going to LMR600 or 900 for the UHF and VHF. If you do the calculations for HF I think you will find the loss in LMR 400; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-09/msg00419.html (9,051 bytes)
63. Re: [TowerTalk] Coax (score: 1): Author: "James C. Hall, MD" <nwtcc@earthlink.net>; Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 18:54:54 -0500; Craig: I like LMR-600 for the long run between your SPG panel and the base of your tower (or wherever you put your antenna switch). Then use BuryFlex with the antenna runs and in close to the rigs. W; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-09/msg00427.html (8,831 bytes)
64. [TowerTalk] Coax (score: 1): Author: Richard Whitekettle <rich@pmarep.com>; Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 13:41:03 -0400; New back to radio after long absence and need advice on coax. I am putting a 3 element steppir on a 50 ft crank up and would like to know what coax to use where to buy it and about how much should it; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-09/msg00732.html (8,748 bytes)
65. Re: [TowerTalk] Coax (score: 1): Author: Steve Katz <stevek@jmr.com>; Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 10:42:15 -0700; New back to radio after long absence and need advice on coax. I am putting a 3 element steppir on a 50 ft crank up and would like to know what coax to use the height of the tower. For me to reach my; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-09/msg00733.html (7,214 bytes)
66. Re: [TowerTalk] Coax (score: 1): Author: wa3afs@inav.net; Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 14:23:15 -0500; The type of coax depends a little on the distance from the shack to the top of the tower. Purists would probably say 9913 or 9914 or the equivalent. I have had excellent results using RG8X for distan; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-09/msg00734.html (10,929 bytes)
67. Re: [TowerTalk] Coax (score: 1): Author: "Jim Miller" <JimMiller@STL-OnLine.Net>; Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 14:01:38 -0500; I built a stand just for that. Works great 73, Jim to just cable code Lots _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list Tower; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-09/msg00736.html (8,996 bytes)
68. Re: [TowerTalk] Coax (score: 1): Author: "James C. Hall MD" <nwtcc@earthlink.net>; Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 13:31:15 -0500; Hi Rich: I agree with the comments made thus far. 9914 is sold by Davis RF and goes by the name of "Bury-Flex" and it is excellent cable. I have several runs exceeding 150 feet and have had no proble; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-09/msg00738.html (8,471 bytes)
69. Re: [TowerTalk] Coax (score: 1): Author: "Jim Miller" <JimMiller@STL-OnLine.Net>; Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 14:18:19 -0500; Many will advise AGAINST the use of coax with a mostly air dielectric for an exterior installation (most) because of moisture condensation inside of the coax air space, i.e.. 9913. Better velocity fa; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-09/msg00739.html (13,060 bytes)
70. Re: [TowerTalk] Coax (score: 1): Author: "mryan001" <mryan001@tampabay.rr.com>; Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 16:25:46 -0400; I agree on 9913... After a few lessons with it years ago, I will affirm that it makes great irrigation line when used outdoors. No matter what you do, condensation will build up in the cable and befo; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-09/msg00744.html (14,265 bytes)
71. Re: [TowerTalk] coax (score: 1): Author: "James C. Hall MD" <heartdoc@nwtcc.com>; Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 13:39:43 -0500; Hi Rich: I agree with the comments made thus far. 9914 is sold by Davis RF and goes by the name of "Bury-Flex" and it is excellent cable. I have several runs exceeding 150 feet and have had no proble; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-09/msg00745.html (8,111 bytes)
72. Re: [TowerTalk] Coax (score: 1): Author: "John Pelham" <john@radiophile.com>; Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 17:26:27 -0400; I have had three runs of 9913 (actually an off-brand cheaper equivalent; I can't recall the name at the moment) in place for 17 years. Each run is about 125 feet. There has been no noticeable change; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-09/msg00751.html (9,386 bytes)
73. [TowerTalk] coax (score: 1): Author: Craig Clark <jcclark@wildblue.net>; Date: Wed, 04 Oct 2006 10:50:53 -0400; Since you have pbly looked, are those ratings at the same frequency for the Andrews and Cscope cables? My Times book rates LMR600 at 5.5 KW @ 30 MHz 73, Craig Clark, K1QX RADIOWARE AND RADIO BOOKSTO; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-10/msg00074.html (7,089 bytes)
74. Re: [TowerTalk] coax (score: 1): Author: "Mike Clarson" <mclarson@rcc.com>; Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2006 12:25:56 -0400; Craig: You are correct, of course. The rating I quoted was the "Peak Power" rating, and it was an attempt to add some levity to an otherwise dry discussion. My refusal to use "emoticons" causes these; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-10/msg00078.html (8,903 bytes)
75. Re: [TowerTalk] coax (score: 1): Author: "Pat Barthelow" <aa6eg@hotmail.com>; Date: Wed, 04 Oct 2006 11:48:01 -0700; Interesting conversation, motivated me to to google coax peak power average power and got a lot of interesting stuff: http://www.psibroadcast.com/coax-engelec.asp http://www.astrolab.com/10.asp http:; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-10/msg00086.html (10,547 bytes)
76. [TowerTalk] Coax (score: 1): Author: Jack Barbera <barberaalderwood@yahoo.com>; Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2008 06:08:26 -0700 (PDT); Bend radiis for coax is best if kept at 40X times O.D.Using the filled braid for direct burial is the way to go. Coax heating can be caused by hi SWR.either by too tight a bend or BAD mfg practices.; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-07/msg00566.html (6,811 bytes)
77. Re: [TowerTalk] Coax (score: 1): Author: K7LXC@aol.com; Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2008 21:27:54 EDT; So for RG-8 the minimum bending radius is 20 inches?!? I don't think so. As I recall, the multiple is 6, giving you a 3" radius. It's higher for Andrew Heliax and other high grade coaxes but I don't; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-07/msg00597.html (7,251 bytes)
78. Re: [TowerTalk] Coax (score: 1): Author: "Roger (K8RI)" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>; Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2008 23:29:08 -0400; That's about the minimum bend radius for LMR-600. However that is different from the "repeatable" bend radius. If you bend it and the stuff takes a set. IOW it doesn't try to straighten out, it'll st; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-07/msg00601.html (7,814 bytes)
79. Re: [TowerTalk] Coax (score: 1): Author: Charles Gallo <Charlie@TheGallos.com>; Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2008 05:29:02 -0400; ...snip... Per NASA "Coaxial cables shall not be bent below the minimum recommended inside bend radius (6 diameters for flexible, 2 diameters for semi-rigid and rigid)." see: http://workmanship.nasa.; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-07/msg00603.html (7,790 bytes)
80. Re: [TowerTalk] Coax (score: 1): Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>; Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2008 07:29:58 -0400; Though it may be overkill for most of our purposes, this is a very enlightening resource - go back to the base site (workmanship.nasa.gov) and follow the pictorial reference link - http://workmanship; /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-07/msg00604.html (7,818 bytes)

Current List: 61 - 80
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]