Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Current\s+choke\s+beads\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TowerTalk] Current choke beads (score: 1)
Author: n7ka@comcast.net
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 22:15:24 +0000
WOW. At the risk of getting flamed to death, here goes. Actually, there is NO risk as I know it will happen. I asked for assistance from those who have gone before and could help to inform me if I wa
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-07/msg00984.html (9,763 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] Current choke beads (score: 1)
Author: K7LXC@aol.com
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 18:45:10 EDT
risk as I know it will happen. inform me if I was headed in the correct direction for a commom mode choke for a 6M antenna project. I have read I NEED to have one. FOR IDEAS AND 1 FOR THE THEORITICAL
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-07/msg00988.html (8,206 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] Current choke beads (score: 1)
Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 17:40:17 -0700
I think the take home message is that you don't need the equipment to build a choke, if it's from a design that someone else HAS measured. If you want to try something new, and it works, great. Howev
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-07/msg00991.html (11,219 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] Current choke beads (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Reisert, W1JR" <W1JR@arrl.net>
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 16:03:43 -0400
Hi Arnie, I guess there has been a discussion on baluns going on. Let me add a few comments on the subject. First off, there are alternatives or choices on transmission line types used in coax baluns
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-07/msg01030.html (18,274 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] Current choke beads (score: 1)
Author: gdaught6@stanford.edu
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 15:13:52 -0700
< snip > Hmmm. I was under the impression that "Teflon" IS "PTFE". I thought that Teflon was DuPont's trade name for PolyTetraFluoroEthylene. Am I wrong? 73, George T. Daughters, K6GT _______________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-07/msg01041.html (7,920 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] Current choke beads (score: 1)
Author: Ian White GM3SEK <gm3sek@ifwtech.co.uk>
Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2007 10:35:48 +0100
wrote: "Teflon" is a trade name, and can be used however its owners wish. When PTFE was first invented, both names meant the same thing. But DuPont have since developed a much wider range of related
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-07/msg01061.html (9,546 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] Current choke beads (score: 1)
Author: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2007 09:14:59 -0400
A good choice for toroidal baluns as well as VHF/UHF 1/2 wave baluns is expanded PTFE (ePTFE) since it is very flexible and does not exhibit the center conductor flow of solid dielectric. It also exh
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-07/msg01063.html (10,477 bytes)

8. Re: [TowerTalk] Current choke beads (score: 1)
Author: "Richard (Rick) Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>
Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2007 09:04:17 -0700
Thanks for explaining that Ian. I was never clear on what the difference was. AFAIK, FEP jackets are extruded while PTFE jackets are spiral wrapped. The spiral wrapped stuff is stiffer and undesirab
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-07/msg01075.html (8,198 bytes)

9. Re: [TowerTalk] Current choke beads (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Reisert, W1JR" <W1JR@arrl.net>
Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2007 17:33:41 -0400
Hi Ian, Great to hear from you. Was thinking of you and Nadine when we heard about all the flooding in Oxford. That was a great visit with both of you. I'll bet you're glad you're not there now! Than
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-07/msg01083.html (11,593 bytes)

10. Re: [TowerTalk] Current choke beads (score: 1)
Author: "Keith Dutson" <kdutson@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2007 09:13:20 -0500
Joe, Nice write-up. Thanks for taking the time to post your experience and thoughts. I do not understand this statement since PTFE is marketed by DuPont as Teflon. 73, Keith NM5G Hi Arnie, I guess th
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-07/msg01092.html (15,582 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu